Analysis of Anthony in William Sheakespeare´s Julius Caesar

Analysis of Anthony in William Sheakespeare´s Julius Caesar

Length: 523 words (1.5 double-spaced pages)

Rating: Excellent

Open Document

Essay Preview

More ↓
In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony is a friend and was the right hand man of Julius Caesar. When time came for the death of Caesar, Antony swore allegiance to Brutus and the conspirators, but in truth had deceived them. Brutus had given Antony the right to speak at the funeral of Caesar, but Gaius Cassius had warned against this and Cassius was right to. At the funeral Antony would be the undoing of the conspirators in his funeral oration.
After Brutus had given a reasonable speech convincing the people Caesar had to die for he was an ambitious man, but being naïve he left to many holes in his explanation. This speech temporarily would give protection to him and the conspirators. Antony then enters with the body of Caesar and Brutus leaves the Forum. Antony then begins to give his well-constructed speech, which is a work of rhetorical irony itself. Progressively throughout the speech, Antony repetition of the words honorable and ambitious prosing questions into the mind of the Roman citizens. The use of the word ambitious throughout the speech starts to lose its credibility and force. Antony spoke of a man who thrice was presented a crown, “which he did thrice refuse” (Act III, Scene 2, line 99).
This Caesar wept, when the poor cried, “Did this Caesar seem ambitious?” (Act III, Scene 2, line 93). Antony had told the citizens of Caesar’s will and said he could not read it, but manipulated them into wanting him to read it. When Antony read the will, this further riled the citizens at their already state of mutiny for Caesar an “ambitious’ man had left them land and parks for recreation. As Antony said, “Did this Caesar seem ambitious?” (Act III, Scene 2, line 93). The dignity of the conspirators represented in the word honorable had gone with each use and these men were now hated for back stabbing such a truly honorable man. The “honorable” Brutus was “Caesar’s angel” and “For when the noble Caesar saw him stab, Ingratitude, more strong than traitors’ arms, Quite vanquished him” (Act III, Scene 2, line 183-188). These men were now painted as crooked by the noble Mark Antony.
Antony shows his skills as a great flexible politician and rhetoric when deceiving the conspirators and giving this speech, but best is how he painted himself a heartbroken man. “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar,” (Act III, Scene 2, line 108).

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Analysis of Anthony in William Sheakespeare´s Julius Caesar." 123HelpMe.com. 02 Apr 2020
    <https://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=383421>.

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

Analysis of Marcus Brutus in Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare Essay

- In William Shakespeare’s tragic play Julius Caesar, the protagonist, Brutus, conspires against and successfully kills Caesar; to only find the city he loves in chaos and mutiny from his actions. Brutus in the eyes of many people was a noble and honorable man who loved and adored the city of Rome, and no person thought more of this than Caesar. To Caesar, Brutus was the son he never had, and his love of Brutus was known, therefore the thought of Brutus betraying him was absurd. However, imagine if not only Brutus did not love Caesar, but he hated him....   [tags: Julius Caesar Essays]

Research Papers
811 words (2.3 pages)

Essay about Analysis of Anthony in William Sheakespeare´s Julius Caesar

- In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony is a friend and was the right hand man of Julius Caesar. When time came for the death of Caesar, Antony swore allegiance to Brutus and the conspirators, but in truth had deceived them. Brutus had given Antony the right to speak at the funeral of Caesar, but Gaius Cassius had warned against this and Cassius was right to. At the funeral Antony would be the undoing of the conspirators in his funeral oration. After Brutus had given a reasonable speech convincing the people Caesar had to die for he was an ambitious man, but being naïve he left to many holes in his explanation....   [tags: Friends, Politics, Rome]

Free Essays
523 words (1.5 pages)

Essay on Analysis of Cassius in Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare

- Gaius Cassius Longinus, known as Cassius, is a very rational and manipulative person. He is controlling, greedy, and puts forth a lot of effort in the military. Cassius is a senator of Rome. He is a rebel at heart and also wants everything done his way. Cassius is known for "hears no music," which means that he is not evil, but could never be satisfied. Cassius is a different man to different people, depending on who it is he can be loving or ruthless, gentle or rough, passionate or mean. Caesar's opinion on Cassius is "Yond Cassius has a lean and hungry look; He thinks too much: such men are dangerous." ( l.ii.194)....   [tags: Manipulative, Assassination]

Research Papers
835 words (2.4 pages)

Essay about Analysis of William Shakespeare's The Tragedy of Julius Caesar

- From the absolute power of ancient kings and medieval monarchs to the tyrannical dictators of today, political corruption has been a persistent aspect of governed societies since their emergence early in human existence. In the quest for power, individuals create furtive conspiracies to overthrow governments and destroy policies. The presence of political corruption and conspiracy in Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is prominent, as Brutus and Mark Antony conduct opposing conspiracies in relation to corruption in the Roman government....   [tags: Political Corruption, English Literature]

Research Papers
1357 words (3.9 pages)

Rhetorical Analysis of Mark Antony in Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare

- “Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare is the story of the assassination of Julius Caesar. Two speeches were made after his death, one being by Mark Antony. He uses many rhetorical devices in this speech to counter the previous speech and persuade the crowd that the conspirators who killed Caesar were wrong. Rhetoric is the art of persuasion and these many devices strengthen this by making points and highlighting flaws. Antony uses many rhetorical devices, all of which are used to persuade the crowd that the conspirators are wrong and Caesar did not need to be killed....   [tags: persuasion, personable, irony]

Research Papers
816 words (2.3 pages)

The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare Essay

- In today’s society, people’s wills are corrupt by the power and politics of the government. This is also evident in William Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Shakespeare was born in 1564, about one hundred miles from London, in a market town called Stratford-Upon-Avon. By 1585, Shakespeare had begun his career as an actor and playwright, in London. Shakespeare joined a play company, Lord Chamberlain’s Men, in 1594. Because Shakespeare had a share in the theater company and the theaters where they preformed, he became a wealthy man and bought a house in Stratford for his family....   [tags: Character Analysis, Themes]

Research Papers
1308 words (3.7 pages)

Essay about William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar

- Julius Caesar is a great tragedy written by one of, if not the greatest, writer from the 15th century, William Shakespeare. To write the play Shakespeare based the events in the play on historical events that happened to Julius Caesar in reality. The only source for the play in that time would most likely to have been The Life Of Julius Ceasar by Plutarch. The main point of the play is the conspiracy against and the assassination of Caesar. The main part I can relate to today’s world is that the government of the time betrayed everyone and did all they could do to cover their mistakes instead of fixing the problem....   [tags: Shakesperian Tragedy, Play Analysis]

Research Papers
1593 words (4.6 pages)

Analysis Of Julius Caesar Essay

- In the play ‘Julius Caesar’ by William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar, the Emperor of Rome, is murdered during the third Act. It has been suggested that power and the quest for power are the reasons behind his murder. Power is defined as a position of authority or control with the ability to do or act upon you will. The issue to be investigated is whether Brutus, Octavius and Antony became so corrupted in their quest for power that they killed Julius Caesar, so as to gain his power. It has also been suggested that ‘power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely’....   [tags: William Shakespeare]

Free Essays
1468 words (4.2 pages)

The Structure of Shakespeare's Julius Caesar Essay

- The Structure of Shakespeare's Julius Caesar The structure of the tragedy is chronological, in the sense that the different situations that take place are in order, despite the fact that Shakespeare, in some cases, cuts the time between an event and the other so as to be able to cover from the time the conspiracy is planned until the death of Brutus. However, the different themes of the play contribute to its structuring, in various ways. According to Marvin Speavock and other critics on Shakespeare, the play presents a “two-peak action”, meaning that the play is divided in two different parts: the first three acts on one side, and the last two on the others....   [tags: William Shakespeare Play Analysis]

Free Essays
915 words (2.6 pages)

Analysis Of The Book ' Persepolis ' And ' Julius Caesar ' Essay

- Mobile Desires Desires are strong feelings of wanting or wishing for something to happen. When a person desires something or someone, their sense of yearning is excited by the satisfaction or the thought of the item or person. If Freud is correct when he argues that, “desire is essentially mobile” then we should be able to see how the desires of both characters Marji in Persepolis by Marjane Satrapi, and Brutus in Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare change as a result of those around them (Bennett 207)....   [tags: Roman Republic, Julius Caesar, Julius Caesar]

Research Papers
1066 words (3 pages)

The emotion set into the people and his charisma helped set in motion his revenge. Antony shows his charisma when he descends into the crowd and becoming one without losing his rhetorical influence on the citizens. “Shall I descend? And will you give me leave?” (Act III, Scene 2, line 162). Antony used syntax to make a clear point that he is a noble and plain, while the wrong men and wrong deeds have been done by the conspirators, “To wrong the dead, to wrong myself and you, Than I will wrong such honorable men” (Act III, Scene 2, line 128-129). Though Antony does not speak wrong of the men, he speaks the truth.
Persuasion is but a craft of manipulation that Antony had used throughout the speech. Antony’s duplicity gave way to his ironic speech in which his use of repetition, syntax, tone, and diction stuck the hearts of the Roman citizens. Antony brought questions to the honor of the conspirators and about Caesar’s ambitions. His masterpiece inspired mutiny and created “Mob Rule”. Antony became the protagonist when he did mark his enemies in Caesar’s blood and his hand for vengeance; it was then that Brutus was no longer the protagonist. The most powerful authority shown in Julius Caesar is through words alone and this had been demonstrated by Antony.


Return to 123HelpMe.com