Analysis of America Afire: The Presidental Election of 1800

654 Words2 Pages

America Afire is the story of the most important election in Americas history in the election of 1800. Former allies Jefferson and Adams, president and vice president. They were now a federalist and a republican. They both went against each other to win the 4th presidential election under the Constitution.
The Federalist were one of the political parties under the leadership of Alexander Hamilton. The Federalist wanted a strong central government. The Republicans was the other political parties under the leadership of Thomas Jefferson. The Republicans wanted a states rights party that could nullify federal laws if they conflicted with the state law. The Federalist were populated by businessmen and bankers who lived in the major cities. The Republicans were rural population owners and believed agriculture was the most productive way to have a strong economy by trading their products to foreign countries. The Federalist believed in a strong leadership and a loose constructionist interpretation of the Constitution. The Republicans believed in a strong constructionist interpretation of the Constitution, meaning that if an issue wasn’t written directly in the Constitution then the federal government had no authority to regulate the issue.
One difference between the Federalist and the Republicans was how they went about dealing with Britain and France. The Republicans wanted to build stronger ties with the French, they supported the government that had taken over France after the Revolution. While the Federalist believed that the American foreign policy should favor the British interest. The Republicans believed in protecting what was best for the working classes such as the merchants, farmers, and labors. They believed that an agri...

... middle of paper ...

...urban growth and didn’t like or trust the common man, and Jefferson feared industrial and urban growth and idealized the common man.
“Federalist leaders supported Britain in foreign policy and commercial interest at home, while Republicans rooted for liberty in France and worried about Monarchical Federalist at home”. (Roark p.241). When the Federalist passed the the Alien and Sedition Acts, the republicans opposed them. They said they were “in conflict with the Bill of Rights, but they did not have the votes to revoke them”. (Roark p.243)
The most fundamental difference to separate Federalists and Republicans was the question of which direction American was going to go in the future. Towards some sort of elitist oligarchy controlled by northern business and financial interests. Or towards a more democratic form in which the common man would play a large role.

More about Analysis of America Afire: The Presidental Election of 1800

Open Document