The Desire For Revenge In Montunato: The Character Of Montressor

807 Words2 Pages

As an unreliable narrator, the way Montressor portrays the events of the story are questionable. The reasons behind his actions are not exactly justified. For example, the logic behind Montressor’s desire for revenge is not clearly stated. In the beginning, he mentions how Fortunato insulted him, but does not give any further detail. His sly and cunning actions are described in detail throughout the story, but the reasoning for these events is not given. It is unclear as to exactly what Fortunato did to Montressor to make him seek such brutal revenge. The unreliable narrator gives vague justification for his actions, making the reader interpret and question the events altogether. Montressor’s unstable mental state adds to the unreliability of his narration. This affects the reader 's’ understanding of the story because they end up wondering if the events, according to Montressor, even happened …show more content…

Like both, he is impulsive. While he did seem to have meticulously planned out his revenge plot, his decision to murder Fortunato was an act of impulse. Since Fortunato appears to have been Montressor’s friend, it is a bit surprising that he would want to murder him. Much like a psychopath, Montressor lacks emotion. Among his missing emotions is empathy. He shows no feelings when he kills Fortunato. After he tosses in the torch, he simply walks away without a care. Montressor’s heart grew sick, but it had nothing to do with the murder he’d just committed. Also, both psychopaths and sociopaths feel no remorse or guilt, much like Montressor. Like many sociopaths, Montressor appears (superficially) to be normal in social relationships. He had little to no issues with this friendship with Fortunato. He tolerated his “thousand injuries” and carried on. Montressor acted normal and appeared ordinary in his relationships with other people. But like many, Montressor’s appearances were

Open Document