Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Perspectives on graffiti
Graffiti art essay -300 words
Perspectives on graffiti
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Perspectives on graffiti
Although many people believe that Graffiti is vandalism, it is infact art because many museums display graffiti, people are interested in it, and it displays beauty and emotional power. Many people have learned to appreciate graffiti as an art form and have opened their eyes to the beauty and emotional power it holds. From the video on CBS News, “Is Graffiti Art or Vandalism,” Laura Fanning (museum visitor) explains at 1:42 “… now I see it as more of a commentary and a statement of ‘I’m leaving my mark’…” This quote exhibits a museum visitor whose perception of graffiti changed when she went to a museum that displayed Graffiti. The same message is delivered in the article, “Graffiti Art at the Museum of the City of New York: Writing Was on the Wall, and Some Still Remains” by Ken Johnson. Page one of the article reads, “In 1989, Mr. Wong founded his Museum of American Graffiti on the top floor of a townhouse in the East Village, but real estate complications ended that venture after only six months. In 1994, suffering from AIDS, Mr. Wong donated his collection to the Museum of the City of New York and returned to his hometown, San Francisco, where he died in 1999.” The quote from this article informs the reader that museums will accept people’s collections of graffiti to use in their museum. Museums are usually interested in art and when a museum accepts someone’s personal collection that they have donated it must mean that it is truly art. Not only are museums interested in graffiti as an art form, but many people have come to accept graffiti as an art and take interest in it too.
As stated above, graffiti can be viewed in museums, but they can also be seen in public galleries and peoples homes. From the article by Robin Newton, ...
... middle of paper ...
...r signatures on 18 of the statues.” Although many people will look at this and see it as vandalization, if one looks past that and thinks maybe someone was trying to leave their mark on what they feel about the sculptures then it has a whole new meaning. In the article, “Graffiti and Street Art: 3” by Robin Newton, it reads “… in many countries, writing or painting on public or private property is considered vandalism.” The “vandalism” is displayed in museums all around the world, many people have recognized graffiti and become more interested, and lastly, many people appreciate it for the beauty and emotions tied into the artwork. Even though many people think that Graffiti is vandalism, it is infact ast because it is displayed in museums/ galleries all around the world, people give are interested and give it recognition and it displays beauty and emotional power.
Art is defined by Oxford’s Dictionary as works produced by human creative skill and imagination. The argument of whether or not graffiti is art has been around for an indeterminable amount of time. Because of many different and valid reasons, graffiti should be considered as art.
Graffitists intend their work to be apprehended as art that can communicate feelings and ideas to the audience. For them graffiti is being able to express their self via their painting.
Graffiti has always been, since the 1960s, a controversial yet unobtrusive topic. The major debate of whether or not graffiti is a form of art or if it is simply just a crime has been around ever since the first graffiti artists spread their graffiti all throughout urban areas. In the article, “Art and Crime: Conceptualising Graffiti in the City”, Cameron McAuliffe and Kurt Iveson discuss all the different perspectives and arguments people have involving the criminalization of graffiti, graffiti as art, and protecting graffiti’s authenticity. Many political figures mentioned in the article have tried to heavily criminalize the act of graffiti for various reasons. However, another question arises surrounding the
Within the debate of whether graffiti and tagging contributes to the art of the scape of a city, or if it merely adds to the pollution, both perspectives have merit. Ultimately, there will be a prevalent set of groups that believe strongly that graffiti or tagging constitutes vandalism, even though graffiti can be regulated such that it actually becomes its own art form that contributes to a city’s identity. However, this debate as a whole, as Alain Milon asserts, is the result of media’s dilution of the issue, and lacks the attention to detail to “determin[e] esthetic classifications” of graffiti and tagging as art or as vandalism (Durand 90).
The rise of vandalistic art produced by Banksy and others, has altered the way in which the public views graffiti culture. Where spray paint once represented gangs and violence, it now suggests an exciting and cutting edge artform that could potentially be a lucrative investment. In fact, Banksy’s work is so sought after that people are willing to take bricks out of buildings in order to steal it. In 2013, one of Banksy’s most famous pieces of artwork was stolen from the side of a store in the UK. It was later discovered at a US auction (Banksy Artwork Taken). “Street art has entered the art world’s mainstream, with Banksy pieces regularly selling for more than $1 million” (Salib
What is art? Many people agree that art is an external representation of emotions on the inside and mostly anything can be considered art. But why is graffiti not considered art when the pieces could be better than the “classics” that are placed in museums? People should expand their ideas on graffiti and stop looking at it as an act of rebellion and more of an act of self-expression. Graffiti should be considered an art form because there are no boundaries as to what art is, also graffiti can convey statements that can benefit society whether they’re political messages or a depiction of a controversial topic, graffiti makes people think. Lastly graffiti should be considered a form of art because artists are creating new forms and styles of art rather than traditional paint on canvas.
Graffiti should be considered art because it takes a lot of time and effort, and art comes alive through people's dispute.
It is a ridiculous belief that just because graffiti is done somewhere without consent, it throws out the notion that it is still art. Sure, the piece of work was done illegally but why can’t the work still be appreciated and enjoyed. Art is art wherever it is found. The location of the piece does not change that. In fact, graffiti can kill two birds with one stone. First, at the foundation it is a form of art. Second, on top of that foundation a message can be erected and directed. But as the saying goes, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Graffiti should be aloud to be a legal thing as long as the artist has gotten permission from the owner.“Legal or not, as graffiti seeps into the fabric of neighborhoods, it becomes a natural fact of everyday life in the city.”(The Guardian)Graffiti
Everyone should see graffiti as an art because it contributes to the public good in one way or another, even if we are not aware of it. Graffiti can make a neighborhood more colorful, therefore making it more enjoyable. Graffiti is undeniably art, it just might not be the type of art people are used to. Graffiti has been seen as Vandalism for too long, it is time for the public to accept it as a part of our culture, that adds color, creativity, and artistic
Graffiti is a form of art that people use to express themselves and to convey various messages to people in a particular community. In the movie "Graffiti Verite':. One of the graffiti artist explained that his purpose in doing graffiti is that it allows him to "express his anger' on the wall. Another kid by the name of "Jipsie" said that graffiti is a "form of growth". There were several different explanations that artists shared as well as several different reasons why they like graffiti. The common theme among the graffiti artist and taggers was that graffiti is simply a form of self-expression (Bryan). At the end of the film one tagger made a comment and said, "graffiti is not vandalism, but it is a beautiful crime". This comment did not make sense to me. Committing a crime, a hideous act, is not a beautiful thing to do by any means. Graffiti does not mean people can go around and draw and spray paint on other peoples property. Regardless of what types of graffiti are being expressed by the tagger, this type of self expression is considered vandalism when people decide to draw, destroy, or violate any persons property without consent. As a result of taggers committing the crime of vandalism, property owners, concerned citizens, and law enforcement officers spend too much time, money, and energy trying to put an end to the unlawful act of vandalism.
Can graffiti be considered as an art or it should be considered as an illegal activity? When graffiti began to appear in art galleries in New York City since late 1950s, there has been debate over whether it is an acceptable art practice or not. Graffiti combines features of art with self-expression but media often encourage a negative understanding of graffiti by relating it to crime. Moreover, municipalities and government spend a huge amount of money removing graffiti in order to create a clean and safe environment.
Graffiti artists are being punished way too hard for their incredibly spectacular work. Graffiti is an incredibly popular form of art and people have been debating for a long time whether it is a positive or negative force. Graffiti is most commonly found in the most populated cities like London and New York. Graffiti is a very alluring force of good, because it gives people the opportunity to express their imagination, their ideas, and sometimes, political views.
I’m sure there has been a time in your life where you’ve driven on the I-95 and saw that “Joe loves Lucy” or other professions of love this and hate that. Things like this are written on bridges, trains, and road signs to advertise the artist’s message to the general public, while drivers are left to think why should they care who loves who and who hates what. Graffiti is one of the most controversial issues existing in our society today. Some people may agree that graffiti is art while others may disagree and saying it’s vandalism. This leads to the question of what is vandalism? Oxford English dictionary defines vandalism as an “action involving deliberate destruction of or damage to public or private property”. This definition of
When you're in the city and see spray paint on the wall you're looking at someone's personality. Most likely it’s not painted on a canvas, but for the artist the world is their canvas. Graffiti is all over and ¨Graffiti-hunting has become a sort of tourism” according to Co.Design. Though governments are trying to stop people’s creative flow. Graffiti is extraordinary art that can be a force of good because it is inspiring art that's not worth being punished for.