Natural attitude encompasses everything that you already know. It is that knowledge we take for granted in our day to day lives. The basic knowledge that the life world exists around you and how it functions on a daily basis. In the domain of natural attitude, we do not raise scientific questions or question the existence of something; we just consider them as facts. Consider switching on a fan. Here, every time you switch on a fan, you don’t investigate the functioning of the fan or look into how the fan starts spinning when you put on a switch. You just know that pressing the particular switch will result in the starting of the fan. This is exactly what natural attitude represents and has shaped our perspective of the world. Natural attitude exists not only in case of physical objects, but also in how we perceive other people and ideas. Natural attitude is also relevant in scientific studies, where certain fundamental axioms, ideas or assumptions are often taken for granted.
To understand what natural attitude and preconceptions are, consider yourself as somebody who has never been influenced by any external conception – no knowledge and no experience. You have never been shown the correct way to perceive something or do anything. Imagine what your world would be like. For this, consider an example: Consider a person who has no concept of a particular object, say a book. The person has no idea about what the object ‘book’ is used for, as nobody has ever explained to him the purpose or functionality of a book. Now, to this person, a book is whatever his mind wants it to be. Anytime he encounters a book, his consciousness perceives the book as anything it prefers. Depending on the situation he would use the book as a paperweight,...
... middle of paper ...
...ciated with consciousness or perceptions in phenomenology. Our experiences are always directed towards external objects. There is always a fundamental aboutness that is associated with our consciousness perceiving the outside world. Husserl borrowed or rather developed this idea from his teacher Franz Brentano, who professed the concept of ‘Intentional Inexistence’. But empiricism doesn’t relate to this concept of intentionality. Empiricists subscribe to the concept of ‘indirect realism’.
Through phenomenology, Husserl tried to overcome all shortcomings of empiricism and provide a comprehensive understanding of mind and experience. Phenomenologists advocate that attaining knowledge about structures of mind and experience through phenomenology helps an observer understand that his essential perception of this world is not comprised of empirical scientific knowledge.
A phenomenologist, David Abram, in his book The Spell of the Sensuous, discusses that human is “inter-subjective.” (Abram, 36) Phenomenology is a method of getting to truth through observing how phenomena present themselves to the senses and to the mind, as Abram defines, “phenomenology would seek not to explain the world, but to describe as closely as possible the way the world makes itself evident to awareness, the way things first arise in our direct, sensorial experience.” (Abram, 35) Phenomenology poses the terms inter-subjectivity to describe what is real. Subjectivity refers to the essence of the “I”—first-person perspective. Inter-subjectivity is the perspective developed between, called a kind of “We-ness”. In phenomenology, reality is a collective construction—it is not subjective to the individual or is objectively determined by things, but rather it is inter-subjective.
Genetic phenomenology is Husserl's philosophical successor to his earlier eidetic phenomenology; it represents the highest development in Husserl's project. Husserl's eidetic phenomenology holds that both the structure of intentional acts and the intentional object are given (Detmer 165). Husserl later comes to doubt the givenness in eidetic phenomenology; these structures and objects of consciousness must have developed throughout history (Detmer 166). This is the process of sedimentation: patterns of understanding and expectations gradually influence later experiences (Zahavi 94). Intentional acts themselves have eidetic structures that are not immediately given; they must be analyzed if the phenomenological project is to continue. A close
Morreall, J. (1982) ‘Philosophy and Phenomenological Research’, International Phenomenological Society, Vol. 42, No.3, pp. 407-415
Accepting that we cannot establish the "objectivity" of our experiences' content, Kant nevertheless attempts to resist a slide into relativism by insisting that they are mediated by rationally delineated categories which supposedly insure the transcendental or universal nature of their form, thereby providing an absolute standard against which we might check the veridicality of our descriptions of, and communications concerning, them. However as a priori preconditions of the possibility of experience such categories are obviously inexperienceable in themselves, and consequently must also fall to the phenomenological reduction. (3) Nevertheless, a moments reflection will confirm that our experiences do indeed exhibit structure or form, and that we are able, even from within, or wholly upon the basis of, the (phenomenologically reduced) realm of, our experiences per se, to distinguish between the flux of constantly changing and interrupted subjective appearances, and the relatively unchanging and continuously existing objects constituted therein. Husserl confirms:
In beginning his lengthy phenomenology for identifying the pathway in which Geist will realize itself as Absolute Knowledge, Hegel begins at what many considered the most basic source of all epistemological claims: sensual apprehension or Sense-Certainty. Though the skeptical tradition took this realm as a jumping-off point for making defensible epistemological claims, Hegel sees in the sensual a type of knowledge so general and abstract as to be entirely vacuous. Focusing on the principle that anything known in the Scientific sense must be communicable, through language or its approximations, Hegel shows that whatever the sensual purports to know is inherently incommunicable and therefore cannot represent true knowledge.
John Locke wrote An Essay Concerning Human Understanding in 1689. He strongly defends empiricism in this essay and states his views on human knowledge and true understanding. In Book II, Locke offers his theory of personal identity; namely the mind theory, also known as ‘the psychological criterion’, in the middle of his accounts of general identity where he draws lines between inert objects, living things and persons.
Epiphenomenalism is the idea that mental states are merely byproducts of physical states, and begs the question of how mental states could cause a physical state and have an effect on the physical world. According to this view, John Searle likens consciousness with the froth in ...
Heidegger makes a point of making sure there is an understanding of phenomenology. Studying the method, or a way of doing philosophy, seems important because it gives a descriptive technique of how things look through every individual’s own eyes and mind. Heidegger states that “what we are seeking is Being. And we have formally defined ‘phenomenon’ in the phenomenological sense as that which shows itself as Being and as a structure of Being” (91). Furthermore, “Worldhood is an ontological concept,” and stands for the structure of one of the “constitutive items of Being-in-the-world. But we know Being-in-the-world as a way in which Dasein’s character is defined existenti...
Cognitively - based attitudes simply can be defined as the people’s belief on the quality or the characteristics of any attitude object. It is also an acknowledge belief on someone’s perspective view either from hearing or seeing on an object via means of communication or verbally. Cognitively based attitudes are logical and also it is closely connected with the fact. According to the book,”cognitively Based attitude is an attitude based primarily on people’s beliefs about the properties of an attitude object.”
An example of an attitude could be the feeling towards abortion. A person could repudiate abortion as a birth control measure, while could favor it in cases of rape. An example of a trait could be honesty; a person who is honest that believes that taking $5 left unattended at work is wrong, and that would not lie in their taxes to obtain a refund to obtain a higher refund. In the first case the attitude, feelings and thoughts, toward an action are variable and contingent to the situation. In the second case, the tendency is the same regardless of the
Psychologist’s definitions of attitudes include assessing problems, persons, or actions. These assessments are regularly affirmative or adverse, and unclear. Humans have established attitudes about such issues, and these attitudes influence his or her beliefs as well as behavior. Because people are largely unaware of his or her implicit attitudes, they can have difficulty changing these attitudes.
Those being personal and social. Personal being the ideal version of yourself and social as how society should be. Your system of values is what contributes to the person you are. Your values have attachments to them. The emotional and behavioral factors that give the value and attitude meaning. Attitudes, on the other hand are in conjunction with behavior, a response. There are three components that make up an attitude. They are cognition, emotion and behavior. Of course this is why everyone is entitled to their own opinion. Although attitudes and values do differ such as, a value would consist of a specific belief. Where as an attitude is made up of several beliefs surrounding that
According to Meheaut (2012), preconceptions are defined as “opinions or conceptions formed in advance of “true” knowledge or experience. Thus, preconceptions can be considered also as prejudices or biases in forming scientific concepts. From the perspective of cognitive psychology, preconceptions can be defined as learner’s biased schemas of objects and phenomena” (Meheaut, 2012, para. 10). Preconceptions are often ideas and/or thoughts students’ have in regards to a particular topic or subject area. The “pre-instructional knowledge” (preconceptions) that students’ bring into the classroom can be based on things such as intuition, everyday life experiences, and information learned in other settings (Lucariello & Naff, 2017).
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Arnold V. Miller, and J. N. Findlay. Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford [England: Clarendon, 1977. Print.
An organization is facing a problem of higher attrition rate; which is a serious issue for the organization. The major area of concern here was the attitude and the motivation of the employees.so here we are going to throw some light on the motivation theories and attitude concept which when applied may solve the problems of the organization. Through these theories we can come to know the root of the problem and take a corrective measures.