My definition of euthanasia, which will count for every time that I use the term throughout the paper, is the taking of a human life that benefits the victim in one way or the other. For the sake of clarity, I will go into a short definition of what is meant by “benefit” in regard to the victim. I will look over the consequences of taking a life and who that action affects, either directly or indirectly. And finally I will use the works of great philosophers before me to strengthen my argument through examples that both agree with me as well as those that go against what I have to say.
Before I go into my argument, I will explain how the layout of the essay will support my thesis. I will begin by using the definition of euthanasia as a basis for the permissibility of the act. I will follow this small intro with a short discussion about the moral standing of comatose individuals and what role that plays in active euthanasia. At this point I will introduce the opinion of Pope John Paul II who does not agree with my position and I will counter his argument and through this strengthen my own. After my refutation I will use the works of James Rachels and Frances M. Kamm to ...
... middle of paper ...
...conclusion. In the case of a patient in severe pain, and with the patients consent, it is sometimes permissible to administer a drug with the intent of causing death. This is permissible because causing death is a lesser evil stopping the suffering of the patient is a greater good. I almost had to face the decision of ending my own father’s life when he was in a coma, and even though I would be unable to do it, it is permissible for someone to end his life if the coma resulted in him being in a vegetative state with no higher brain function. Active euthanasia should be permissible in the cases that I have presented and after experiencing the shock of seeing my own father in such a condition, I have come to defend active euthanasia.
Morris, Christopher W. Questions of Life and Death: Readings in Practical Ethics. New York: Oxford UP, 2012. Print.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The Moral Permissibility of Legalizing Active Euthanasia To date, in the united States of America, active euthanasia has been seen as unacceptable in legal terms. However, the issue is not so clear in moral terms among the public, and especially among the medical community. In fact, nearly half of the doctors in the United States say that they would prescribe active euthanasia under certain circumstances. The law that prohibits active euthanasia restricts many people from doing what they feel morally justified to do.... [tags: Papers]
1436 words (4.1 pages)
- Euthanasia is Moral and Ethical There has been much debate in recent American society over the legality and morality of a patients right-to-die. Current legal statue prohibits any form of euthanasia, however, there are many moral and ethical dilemmas concerning the controversy. For the purposes of this essay, I will define euthanasia as the implementation of a decision that a person's life will come to an end before it need stop. In other words, it is a life ending when it would otherwise be prolonged. There is an important distinction between voluntary euthanasia where the decision to terminate life coincides with the individuals wishes and involuntary... [tags: Euthanasia Physician Assisted Suicide]
1608 words (4.6 pages)
- It is the authorsâ€™ intention to argue that some forms of euthanasia, to be exact, passive nonvoluntary and in exceptionally rare cases indirect euthanasia are morally permissible. However it must be noted that due to the limit of words and more importantly the authorsâ€™ lack of experience surrounding euthanasia, the claim of permissibility reflects that of the authorsâ€™ recent course readings and my emergent experience thereof. In addition to this it must also be noted that euthanasia cannot be evaluated exclusively.... [tags: essays research papers fc]
1633 words (4.7 pages)
- Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are actions that hit at the core of what it means to be human - the moral and ethical actions that make us who we are, or who we ought to be. Euthanasia, a subject that is so well known in the twenty-first century, is subject to many discussions about ethical permissibility which date back to as far as ancient Greece and Rome , where euthanasia was practiced rather frequently. It was not until the Hippocratic School removed it from medical practice. Euthanasia in itself raises many ethical dilemmas – such as, is it ethical for a doctor to assist a terminally ill patient in ending his life.... [tags: ethical issues, physician assited suicide]
1763 words (5 pages)
- The applied ethical issue of euthanasia, or mercy killing, concerns whether it is morally permissible for a third party, such as a physician, to end the life of a terminally ill patient who is in intense pain. The word euthanasia comes from the Greek words eu (‘well’) and thanatos (‘death’). It means a painless and gentle death. But in modern usage, it has come to imply that someone’s life is ended for compassionate reasons by some passive or active steps taken by another person. The euthanasia controversy is part of a larger issue concerning the right to die.... [tags: essays research papers]
1577 words (4.5 pages)
- Abstract Euthanasia is a long debated topic, going back for decades in our country alone. Both sides of the topic have valid points morally and ethically. The Netherlands have had euthanasia laws in effect since 1973. America has very few states with legislation on the books: Oregon enacted in 1997, Washington 2008. Germany experimented with Active Euthanasia in the 1930’s, resulting in one of the most horrendous genocides in the past millennium. No where else do we have a cohort more at risk than the elderly, as they fall prey to the pressures of getting out of the way, and with a burgeoning population of baby boomers now becoming the elderly our system already strained now faces even mor... [tags: Euthanasia Essays]
1625 words (4.6 pages)
- In Sullivan versus Rachel’s on euthanasia I will show that James Rachel’s argument is logically stronger than Sullivan’s argument. I will present examples given by both authors regarding their arguments and also on their conclusions about it. I will explain both of the author’s logical strengths and weaknesses in their arguments. I will give the examples given by both authors on how they prove their arguments to be true and later I will decide whose argument is stronger based on their strengths and weaknesses.... [tags: death, active euthanasia]
1424 words (4.1 pages)
- Classical American Pragmatism and Assisted Suicide ABSTRACT: Helping people to die may involve killing and/or alleviation of pain in a dying person. A dual commitment to the avoidance of killing and the alleviation of pain raises the question of whether these two ways of helping people are always compatible. This paper addresses the question through use of sources in classical American pragmatism and contemporary bioethics. First, I apply Charles Peirce’s notion of pragmatism to the concept of killing through consideration of the empirical consequences of alternative interpretations.... [tags: Euthanasia Suicide Death Essays]
3589 words (10.3 pages)
- Active Euthanasia, Free Will and Autonomy "Medicine in the hands of a fool has always been poison and death." -C. J. Jung Euthanasia, from the Greek, quite literally means "the good death." Advocates of euthanasia, offer it as a solution for the emotional, psychological and physiologic suffering of terminally ill patients. The type of euthanasia, which is presently under debate, is called "active euthanasia" and is defined as an act performed by an individual to bring about the death of another person.... [tags: Euthanasia Physician Assisted Suicide]
1933 words (5.5 pages)
- Active Euthanasia Active euthanasia is the act of killing of a living person in attempts to stop the suffering on someone's behalf. Active euthanasia should remain illegal because of the immorality of the acts. In looking at the definition, that will be enough to prove that active euthanasia should not be accepted in our society. In the first part of the definition, active euthanasia is the killing of a living person. Despite any circumstances, a living person has the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.... [tags: Free Euthanasia Essay]
469 words (1.3 pages)