Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
International relations humanitarian intervention
The history of humanitarian intervention
The importance of foreign aid
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: International relations humanitarian intervention
It amazing that a country like The United States of America, who is so in tune with the world would not respond in more of a prompt manner to the atrocities committed in Bosnia. The U.S.A. is like no other country in the world, when there is a problem, like a natural disaster in another part of the world they are more than willing to swiftly help. For example, we were the first to respond to the 2010 earthquake in Haiti, and our efforts to help them rebuild lasted for what seemed like a lifetime. In addition, at that time our country was beginning to slip into an economic crisis but we were still able to send millions of dollars overseas? Helping a country rebuild is harmless, but if they had acknowledged the events in Bosnia and chose to intervene, it had the potential to start a war. It was almost as if they were waiting for the issue to subside. At times, our country selfishly picks and chooses the types of problems they want to help with, and more often than not they choose what is safe.
The United States of America is said to be one of the most powerful countries in the world, and I recognize that we have the capability to intervene and stop these malicious acts from occurring. When atrocities occur in other parts of the world it often goes unnoticed for some time, but once discovered it is typically brought to an end. It is the responsibility of our country and other countries around the world to come together to protect not only our own citizens, but also those living in other countries. It is remarkable that we can take a stand against violence of any sort and try to make it end, even when we have our own major instances of atrocities going on in our own country. It is my belief that it is the right thing to do to protect ...
... middle of paper ...
...ny human being no matter what the extent of the brutality. If human beings do not have the ability to protect themselves; I believe it would be very irresponsible to look the other way. We are all equal on this earth, no one person is any more important than the next. All innocent victims deserve the protection we can provide. Our country needs more people like Peter Maass in their face saying “Get out there and do something about it!” Why is it that our country finds it necessary to prioritize the severity of atrocities? These problems are not going away anytime soon; the sooner we acknowledge them, the sooner we can work on assembling a more pleasant world.
Works Cited
Maass, Peter. “The Wild Beast.” 1996. World Views: Classic and Contemporary Readings. 6th ed. Eds. Daren Felty, Ed Macy, Ann McDonald, Jack Trotter, Roger West and Susan Williams. 509-10. Print
The U.S. has been sending troops to over-sea countries to aid the needy, and take certain measures to try to keep our country safe. We want to help the innocent lives, care for the civilians, and want them to be free. We help other countries so that maybe one day they can stand on their own! Power is everything. Power is what controls the world, and without it, you become weak. When we help other countries, that shows how powerful we are, and how strong we are to stand on our on and help! The U.S is considered to be the superpower in the world. Therefore, it should use its power to help other countries in need. Yes, we have a lot of problems with our government,
Campbell, Patty. “Radical Monster.” The Horn Book Magazine. Boston: Nov/Dec 1999. Vol. 75, Iss. 6; pg. 769.
The United States continues to give around $550 billion in aid to other countries each year, making America the world's top donor by far (Richardson). While the United States government only supplies $252 billion to needy Americans each year. Former Assistant to the President for Communications, Patrick Buchanan said, "The idea that we should send endless streams of tax dollars all over the world, while our own country sinks slowly in an ocean of debt is, well, ludicrous" (Foreign Aid). The United States need to give money to support the domestic impoverished rather than supporting developing foreign countries because the poverty and homelessness in America is increasing faster than the aid necessary to reduce this trend. Part of the reason that the United States should aid the domestic impoverished is that some foreign countries cannot be trusted with the money given to them and in certain cases, the money intended to aid countries are harmful for that country’s well-being.
Unfortunately this upset the native Bosnian people. So, although the United States feels obligated to help the Bosnian Cause, they may be worsening the situation with their involvement, both there and in the U.S There are two sides to this story. The first is the opinion that the United States should completely withdraw from Bosnia. The other opinion is that the United States should go headlong and give Bosnia their full support, and commit more troops and more supplies to the Bosnian Cause. There are some positive things done by the United States in Bosnia. The presence of U.S troops did bring temporary peace to the area. Although the peace is purely an act, it does give leaders time to talk and plan without worrying about their people dying. Also, the United States presence in Bosnia helped to eradicate the most horrific problem in Bosnia, large Serbian concentration camps and mass Albanian genocide.
The Species of the World. A people's history of the United States. (2003 ed.) In: The Journal of Science.
Intervening in countries facing genocide costs hundreds of millions of dollars. History clearly shows the cost to intervene, take WWII for example or the Rwanda genocide, or the Somali genocide. All of these genocides costs interventionists $400 million or more, “ Each of the more than 220 Tomahawk missiles fired by the U.S. military into Libya, for example, cost around $1.4 million… Spent between $280,000 and $700,000 for each Somali saved” (Valentino). $280,000 is a ton of money to save one person, and given these high costs, it could cost up to $7 million dollars to save ten people. They are not saving that many lives by deciding to intervene either, “Scholars have estimated that the military mission there probably saved between 10,000 and 25,000 lives,”(Valentino). 10,000-25,000 lives and the U.S. spent $7 billion to intervene
It has been said that the wolf is one of the most voracious and horrifying animals that exist in nature today. But, in all reality, is that actually true? One is unable to make an assumption such as this without a firsthand experience, or so that is expressed in In The Shadow of a Rainbow and Never Cry Wolf. Authors Robert Franklin Leslie and Farley Mowat make every attempt to convey the true nature of the wolf throughout their journeys, as they prove claims falsely accusing wolves, with documented evidence of complete vigilance. These works of literary nonfiction effectively refute anti-wolf claims made within them through being dangerous to the wildlife, dangerous to humans, and viciousness.
The responsibility to protect is a states responsibly to protect their own citizens, but when they become unwilling to do so, the responsibility is transferred to the society of states (Baylis, Smith, Owens 480). In the article Samantha Power, the current U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, urged Obama to endorse in the doctrine responsibility to protect. She believed power to be a partisan of the doctrine responsibility to protect (Goldberg 3). Obama announced that we recognize the killing of one thousand people which included innocent children through the use of a weapon. His statement mentioned the killings were through the use of a weapon that shouldn’t be used in war in which 98 or 99 percent of humanity says so also. If no action is taken, he stated that we would only be sending a signal that international norm doesn’t mean much and acknowledged this as a danger to our national society (Goldberg 9). Related to the doctrine responsibility to protect are human right norms in which president Obama pointed out were
America has proven they can help restore a country’s government when times are tough. After their bombs destroy a country, American planes drop off food for the starving civilians. Indeed, America has shown great leadership, yet they haven’t put as much focus on the problems that is in their own homeland. We are living in a country where the cost of living and minimum wage does not help feed a family, a government that spends billions of dollars to help rebuild other countries, also a man and women having the same college degree but struggles with a gender pay gap.
What Foreign Aid Is There are two words that many politicians like to shy away from, and those are the ones that aren’t two words are "foreign aid. " Taking a firm stand on either side of this topic. is usually side-stepped by decision makers. Their opinions are usually based on a case-by-case analysis. This extremely controversial topic involves whether or not to support the policy of foreign aid to needy or sometimes not so needy countries.
...ple would be a bystander, it is so scary when it’s a life or death decision of you or your family, but if we don’t step in and stand up for our neighbors, friends, colleagues, they could be taken and killed in seconds and we will have to live with the fact that we didn’t do anything. Like in Rwanda when a war broke out between the two different tribes, Hutu or Tutsi, and the Hutu gained control and killed 1,000,000 Tutsi’s in 100 days with Machetes, and that could have all been stopped if people wouldn’t have helped the Hutu gain control and help with the Mass killings. We never know what people are capable of, anything could happen at any time, if we just prevent the steps and do what we can as individuals to help others we can prevent Genocides for ever happening again.
Hoggart, Simon. “Beauty and the beasts.” The Spectator. ProQuest, 31 July 2010. Web. 28 Feb. 2014.
Many times we ask why nobody did anything to stop such horrific events from happening. Actually, many people said that this would never happen again but this is not the case. Since the Holocaust we have seen several examples of how the general public sometimes refuses to acknowledge the occurrence of events and how the government often has little political will to stop mass murders until it is too late. One example of this that occurred not too long ago is the Rwandan Genocide. In 1994, between half a million to a million Rwandan Tutsi as well as thousands of moderate Hutu, were exterminated in the clearest mass murder case since the Holocaust. The world stood back and observed as the murders took place. Samantha Power, in the book she wrote, A Problem From Hell: America and the Age of Genocide1,and her article The Atlantic Monthly, “Bystanders to Genocide: Why the United States Let the Rwandan Tragedy Happen,” Power writes “The story of U.S. policy during the genocide in Rwanda is not a story of willful complicity with evil. U.S. officials did not sit around and conspire to allow genocide to happen. But whatever their convictions about ‘never again,’ many of them did sit around, and they most certainly did allow genocide to happen.”2 Samantha Power's writing shows that the U.S. government knew enough about the genocide through early warnings but nevertheless because they lacked political will to do anything about it they passed up many opportunities to end the rain of terror.3
Krakauer, Jon. Into the wild. New York: Anchor Books , a division of Random House Inc.,, 1997. Print.
The Responsibility to Protect doctrine is a United Nations (UN) initiative which was created to prevent the act of genocide (United Nations, 2014. pg. 1). According to the guidelines, states must maintain the utmost duty to halt and pre...