Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Us history flashcards roots of the new conservatism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Us history flashcards roots of the new conservatism
The rise to power of the New Right was one of the most significant aspects in post-war America. This did not just appear out of nowhere though; it was a result of years of important shifts in American politics influenced by people like George Wallace, Barry Goldwater, Phyllis Schlafly, and Ronald Reagan. This turn towards the Right for American politics is attributed to the sudden changes in American society and culture that did not mix well with traditional, religious Southern Americans who were seen as victims of these changes. The sources that will be used to bring forth this argument are The Politics of Anger by Dan Carter, Piety and Property: Conservatism and Right-Wing Movements in the Twentieth Century by Lisa McGirr, and The Religious Right and the New Republican Party by E.J. Dionne, Jr.
In The Politics of Anger Dan Carter writes that George Wallace was successful in translating his bare-bones Alabama racism into a national issue because he reached out to white Americans or any other white community who were suffering from the Black civil rights movements. He also attempted, and succeeded at first, to turn his racist and segregationist speech into more of a State Rights vs. Federal Rights question. Then, with the existing Red Scare within common Americans, he was able to make a connection between those Blacks and liberals and Communists, fortifying his position among strong anti-communist Whites. He used “the cold war fears of international communism to discredit the civil rights movement” (346).
Moreover, there was one defining moment in Wallace’s career, Carter explains, that brought serious attention: his “Standing in the Schoolhouse Door” incident, where he blocked the entrance to the University of Alabama for tw...
... middle of paper ...
...ciety. Racism helped shape some of the early right-wing politicians such as George Wallace, and a new conservatism grew from there. To say that all Conservatives are racist now, or even then, is wrong; however, no one can deny that it is at the core of the New Right. Even now in the South of the United States there is widespread support of the Republican Party; the South where tradition takes over progress. While the Republican Party may have changed some views since the 60s, the early contributors laid the groundwork for what would follow with current politicians like John McCain, Sarah Palin, or even the sharp rise of this new Tea Party movement.
Works Cited
The Politics of Anger by Dan Carter, Piety and Property: Conservatism and Right-Wing Movements in the Twentieth Century by Lisa McGirr, and The Religious Right and the New Republican Party by E.J. Dionne, Jr.
The Antebellum Era between the years of 1825 to 1850 was abundant with many reform movements that signified great change within the people of the nation. Although many of these changes were good and lasting reforms, extremists’ stark views did the contrary and inhibited change. Luckily, reform movements such as the women’s rights movement, the abolition of slavery, and temperance all led the nation in the right direction towards the expansion of democratic ideals. These ideals encompass the belief that all citizens are equal and are entitled to certain unalienable rights.
Looking at the United States in 1965, it would seem that the future of the liberal consensus was well entrenched. The anti-war movement was in full swing, civil rights were moving forward, and Johnson's Great Society was working to alleviate the plight of the poor in America. Yet, by 1968 the liberal consensus had fallen apart, which led to the triumph of conservatism with the election of President Reagan in 1980. The question must be posed, how in the course of 15 years did liberal consensus fall apart and conservatism rise to the forefront? What were the decisive factors that caused the fracturing of what seemed to be such a powerful political force? In looking at the period from 1968 to the triumph of Reagan in 1980, America was shaken to the core by the Watergate scandal, the stalling of economic growth, gas shortages, and the Vietnam War. In an era that included the amount of turbulence that the 1970's did, it is not difficult to imagine that conservatism come to power. In this paper I will analyze how the liberal consensus went from one of its high points in 1965 to one of its lows in 1968. From there I will show how conservatism rose to power by the 1980 elections. In doing so, I will look at how factors within the American economy, civil rights issues, and political workings of the United States contributed to the fracturing of the liberal consensus and the rise of conservatism.
People attending schools before 1960’s were learning about certain “unscrupulous carpetbaggers”, “traitorous scalawags”, and the “Radical Republicans”(223). According to the historians before the event of 1960’s revision, these people are the reason that the “white community of South banded together to overthrow these “black” governments and restore home rule”(223). While this might have been true if it was not for the fact that the “carpetbaggers were former Union soldiers”, “Scalawags… emerged as “Old Line” Whig Unionists”(227). Eric Foner wrote the lines in his thesis “The New View of Reconstruction” to show us how completely of target the historians before the 1960’s revision were in their beliefs.
Black, E. & Black, M. (2003). The rise of southern republicans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dye, Thomas R., L. Tucker Gibson, Jr., and Clay Robison. Politics in America. Ninth ed. Vol. 2. New York, NY: Longman, 2011. 337. Print.
The Montgomery Bus Boycott can be viewed as a symbol of the Civil Rights Movement as a whole, as neither one’s success was due solely to the work of the political system; a transformation in the consciousness of America was the most impactful success of both. Passionate racism ran in the veins of 1950s America, primarily in the south, and no integration law would influence the widespread belief that African Americans were the same level of human as Caucasians. The abolition of racism as a political norm had to start with a unanimous belief among blacks that they had power as American citizens; once they believed that to be true, there was no limit to the successes they could see.
Abortion, school prayer, gay rights, gun politics and many more are all a part of the list of controversies that divide our country. A culture war is a conflict between groups with different ideals, beliefs, and issues. James Davison Hunter’s book, Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America, shows that these issues “are not isolated from one another but are part of a fabric of conflict which constitutes nothing short of a struggle over the meaning of America. Unlike the religious and cultural conflict that historically divided the nation, the contemporary culture war is fought along new and, in many ways, unfamiliar lines” (Hunter). Hunter argued that two definable polarities existed in the major issues of the war. The new shift in cultural acceptance of the times has changed the culture war. Many Americans argue that “there is a religious war going on in this country, a cultural war as critical to the kind of nation we shall be as the Cold War itself, for this war is for the soul of America” (Fiorina). However, some argue that the culture war is only based on small differences between the Democrats and Republicans. The issue at hand is how divided the American public is today and how much time is focused on this polarization. This division is not just a small difference in parties, but more a difference in moral and religious issues.
Starting during the 1970s, factions of American conservatives slowly came together to form a new and more radical dissenting conservative movement, the New Right. The New Right was just as radical as its liberal opposite, with agendas to increase government involvement beyond the established conservative view of government’s role. Although New Right politicians made admirable advances to dissemble New Deal economic policies, the movement as a whole counters conservativism and the ideologies that America was founded on. Although the New Right adopts conservative economic ideologies, its social agenda weakened the conservative movement by focusing public attention to social and cultural issues that have no place within the established Old Right platform.
Dye, Thomas R. , L. Tucker Gibson Jr., and Clay Robinson. Politics In America. Brief Texas Edition ed. New Jersey: Pearson, 2005.
belief that the sanctity of the home and Christian right found its way into the
Hicks Laurel, Thompson George T., Lowman Michael R., Cochran George C.. American Government and Politics in the Christian Perspective. Florida: Beka Book Publications, 1984.
The political crisis of the 1850’s is one of the most underrated influential decades in US history. Many people talk about the 1920’s and the 1940’s and 50’s; however, much of that history ─ especially of that between the late 1940’s and the late 1960’s ─ was predicated upon by the crisis of the 1850’s. To understand its importance, one must understand its composition, its origin, and its effect. The crisis of the 1850’s, predicated upon the furious debates of slavery in new western territories and consisting over debates of states’ rights versus federal power, had lasting effects directly concerning the Civil War and on the nation especially in relation to the century long ideological battle over race in America.
The prime example of their success is Ronald Reagan with his mix of conservatism and populism. Rhetoric about morality, freedom and responsibility now resonated in new ways with increasing numbers of white middle-class Americans who were concerned with social changes and the threat to their privileges. Even during the Watts Riots, Reagan landed the 1966 campaign for California Governor. But, conservatives did not ease up on their utter disdain for communism. And it highlights a core aspect of McGirr’s argument: she observes how conservatism pits a white-collar middle class against communism and its sinister plots of
Recently you have received a letter from Martin Luther King Jr. entitled “Letter from Birmingham Jail.” In Dr. King’s letter he illustrates the motives and reasoning for the extremist action of the Civil Rights movement throughout the 1960’s. In the course of Dr. King’s letter to you, he uses rhetorical questioning and logistical reasoning, imagery and metaphors, and many other rhetorical devices to broaden your perspectives. I am writing this analysis in hopes you might reconsider the current stance you have taken up regarding the issues at hand.
The New Christian Right was a conservative force that had grew and spread rapidly in the United States in recent thirty or forty years. It had a feature which was having the strong support for the conservative society and political values. The New Christian Right was grouped by thousands of Americans of integrity, various Right wing institutions, organizations and media, all kinds of Christian Right leaders and politicians, and its Infrastructure of the Right-wing ideology.