We all can relate to technologies in ways past generation could not. Today our behaviors are constantly being watch by something or someone whether we like it or not. Back in history, the only surveillance people had were their eyes. They did not have advance technologies like we do in our generation. In, “Discipline and Punish: the Birth of the Prison” a book by Michel Foucault talks about disciplinary power and the structure of control it had on prison. People were constantly being inspected on every action they made. Not only were they being inspected but punishment were given to them if they did not do as they were told. Like the seventeen century when the plague came into society. The plague was the power structure, much so like a colony. Its states, “the plague is met by order; it function is to sort out every possible confusion” (197). Prisoners were constantly being checked and people were locked in their house so that they could not contaminate those who were not already contaminated. Today, surveillance is not only located in prisons, schools, and military barracks. It's practically everywhere you go. In undeveloped countries, like my own, Guyana, the middle school “Tain” did not have advance technologies but behavior were always being looked at by teachers and the headmaster. Undeveloped school do not need to rely on technologies when it have other sources to bring in information. The school itself it a panoptican. Foucault help me see the school differently because power does not revolve around surveillance, surveillance in this case is not modern technologies. But the eyes of other watching.
In “Discipline and punish: The Birth Order of prison”, Foucault talks about the modern use of technologies and the power it ...
... middle of paper ...
... notion of the panoptican, have the power to cause other to be careful of their action. As Foucault states, “an annular building; at the center, a tower; this tower is pierced with wide windows that open onto the inner side of the ring; the periphery building is divided into cells, each of which extends the whole widths of the building; they have two windows, one on the side, corresponding to the windows of the tower; the other, on the outside, allows the light to cross the cell from one end to the other"
Works Cited
Piro, Joseph M. "Foucault And The Architecture Of Surveillance: Creating Regimes Of Power In Schools, Shrines, And Society." Educational Studies 44.1 (2008): 30-46. Academic Search Premier. Web. 21 Nov. 2013.
Provenzo, Eugene F. "Classroom Doors And Panoptic Control." Educational Studies 44.1 (2008): 91-92. Academic Search Premier. Web. 21 Nov. 2013.
In “Panopticism” Foucault states, “the major effect of the Panopticon: to induce in the inmate a state of conscious and permanent visibility that assures the automatic functioning of power” (Foucault, pg. 201). The function of the Panopticon is to keep the prisoners orderly by instilling fear inside of them, this fear forces them to stay in their cells, and to remain compliant. The Panopticon is a building designed for surveillance.
Perhaps no other event in modern history has left us so perplexed and dumbfounded than the atrocities committed by Nazi Germany, an entire population was simply robbed of their existence. In “Our Secret,” Susan Griffin tries to explain what could possibly lead an individual to execute such inhumane acts to a large group of people. She delves into Heinrich Himmler’s life and investigates all the events leading up to him joining the Nazi party. In“Panopticism,” Michel Foucault argues that modern society has been shaped by disciplinary mechanisms deriving from the plague as well as Jeremy Bentham’s Panopticon, a structure with a tower in the middle meant for surveillance. Susan Griffin tries to explain what happened in Germany through Himmler’s childhood while Foucault better explains these events by describing how society as a whole operates.
However, there are other critiques that take a different approach on the oppression that exists in the novel. In "Urban Panopticism And Heterotopic Space In Kafka 's Der Process And Orwell 's Nineteen Eighty-Four,” Raj Shah argues that the way in which society in novel is oppressed is not an obvious oppression but one that focuses on constant surveillance. He uses Foucault’s arguments on panopticism to describe this. Shah states, “Foucault neologizes panopticism to describe a form of power relying not on overt repression, but rather upon the continuous surveillance of a population and the consequent strict regulation of the body” (703). He explains it is the constant surveillance that strips individuals of their rights and places them under oppression. He goes on to
Parents begin to fear even their children, who are capable of landing them in jail. This establishes relationships built on distrust, further distancing people and disabling the ability to form social bonds. This is best portrayed in the scene where Winston visits his neighbors, the Parsons. Mrs. Parsons is visibly shaken the whole time, as her children keep a watchful eye over their conversation. It seems ridiculous to fear children, especially your own children, but as the kids had their own father thrown into jail, it makes sense for Mrs. Parsons to feel afraid and distanced from her children. As each person feels alone and alienated under big brother’s watchful eye, they have no choice but to build the only relationship and bond they can, with that of their oppressor. The knowledge that the thought police watches the citizen’s every move influences the masses towards a “norm” of a constant state of fear and discipline resulting in utmost loyalty to Big Brother. Also, because people have no idea when they’re being watched, they learn to behave as if always under scrutiny. This transforms people into their own forms of a panoptic gaze, policing their own thoughts and actions from the fear of possible surveillance. Foucault refers to it as “ becoming the bearers of our own oppression”. Aside from establishing a norm for behavior, the panoptic gaze and thought police also exhibit deadly force on those who display what they consider abnormal behavior. When Winston and a woman named Julia from his workplace commit the crime of falling in love and starting a relationship as an act of rebellion, the thought police capture them and take them to the Ministry of Love. Ironically here , they are tortured until no feelings of love or treason remain.
In Foucault’s analysis, the concept of Panopticon is developed based on the manipulation of knowledge and power as two coexisting events. He believes that knowledge is obtained through the process of observation and examination in a system of panopticon. This knowledge is then used to regulate the behaviors and conduct of others, creating an imbalance in power and authority. Not only can knowledge create power, power can also be used to define knowledge where the authority can create “truth”. This unbalance of knowledge and power then marks a loss of power for the ends being watched, resulting in an unconditional acceptance of regulations and normalization.
The theory begins with a vivid description of the public torture of Robert- François Damiens who was convicted of attempted regicide in the mid-18th century. Damiens was subject to execution via drawing and quartering, an English form of torture that involved strapping the victim to a wooden panel while ripping their body apart limb from limb. By the earth 19th century inmates were no longer publically tortured but instead forced to undergo a rigorous daily schedule. Foucault brings these ideas into question as a way to show the profoundly rapid changes in the western penal system. To Foucault, these changes occurred not as a way of humanizing inmates but as another form of subjection. He attempts to tie humans growing scientific knowledge with that of the technological development and growing prison development at the time. He argues that knowledge and power feed on one another, which is a rejection of the notion that the two are merely separate entities. For Foucault, one of the greatest punishments inflicted upon humans is the notion of identity and the way it can be used to control, regulate, and watch citizens. He argues that public torture was a theatrical production but was stopped after producing unwanted consequences. Torture must be carried out in a way that does not produce unwanted consequences, but achieves very specific purposes. Torture was
Foucault once stated, “Our society is one not of spectacle, but of surveillance; under the surface of images, one invests” (301). By this, he means that our society is full of constant supervision that is not easily seen nor displayed. In his essay, Panopticism, Foucault goes into detail about the different disciplinary societies and how surveillance has become a big part of our lives today. He explains how the disciplinary mechanisms have dramatically changed in comparison to the middle ages. Foucault analyzes in particular the Panopticon, which was a blueprint of a disciplinary institution. The idea of this institution was for inmates to be seen but not to see. As Foucault put it, “he is the object of information, never a subject in communication”(287). The Panopticon became an evolutionary method for enforcing discipline. Today there are different ways of watching people with constant surveillance and complete control without anyone knowing similar to the idea of the Panopticon.
Michel Foucault may be regarded as the most influential twentieth-century philosopher on the history of systems of thought. His theories focus on the relationship between power and knowledge, and how such may be used as a form of social control through institutions in society. In “Truth and Juridical Forms,” Foucault addresses the development of the nineteenth-century penal regime, which completely transformed the operation of the traditional penal justice system. In doing so, Foucault famously compares contemporary society to a prison- “prison is not so unlike what happens every day.” Ultimately, Foucault attempts to exemplify the way in which disciplinary power has become exercised in everyday institutions according to normalization under the authority network of individuals such that all relationships may be considered power relations. Thus, all aspects of society follow the model of a prison based on domination. While all aspects of society take the shape of prison, most individuals may remainignorant of such- perhaps just as they are supposed to. As a result, members of society unconsciously participate in the disciplinary power that aims to “normalize,” thus contributing to and perpetuating the contemporary form of social control. Accordingly, the modern penal regime may be regarded as the most effective system of societal discipline. [OK – SOLID INTRO]
Foucault wrote a book called Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison explaining his thoughts on how he discipline should be taught. Discipline and Punish is a book about the emergence of the prison system. The conclusion of the book in relation to this subject matter is that the prison is an institution, the objective purpose of which is to produce criminality and recidivism. The system encompasses the movement that calls for reform of the prisons as an integral and permanent part. Foucault states that The more important general theme of the book is that of “discipline” in the penal sense, a specific historical form of power that was taken up by the state with professional soldiering in the 17th century, and spread widely across society, first via the panoptic prison, then via the division of labor in the factory and universal education. The purpose of discipline is to produce “docile bodies,” the individual movements of which can be controlled, and which in its turn involves the psychological monitoring and control of individuals, indeed which for Foucault produces individuals as
Drawing on the work of Foucault, discuss the claim that ‘we live in a surveillance society’.
Big Brother, always watching, loss of privacy: all of these are ideas associated with surveillance and the consequences surrounding it. Often in today’s society, people have experienced the always watching eye of the camera while in school and feel an immediate sense of outrage at their loss of privacy in situations like this. The balancing act of safety in a community with the concern regarding loss of privacy is a difficult one. Though many students view the loss of privacy as a terrible and uncomfortable thing, the benefits this surveillance can provide are too vital to the safety of the community to give up from this fear.
Foucault, M. (1995) Discipline and Punishment The Birth of the Prison [online]. 2nd ed. USA: Penguin Books, Ltd. [Accessed 01 January 2014].
In Michel Foucault’s Discipline and Punish, he examines the role of the panopticon in the prison system in the eighteenth century. The panopticon was a method to maintain power and to ensure good conduct amongst prisoners. The panopticon is described as a central tower where one in power can oversee the surrounding area. Surrounding the center tower are cells containing prisoners. The inmates aren’t able to communicate with one another. Also, the prisoners are unable to distinguish whether it is a guard on duty watching their every move. The architectural design of the panopticon gives guards or those in power the upper hand. As a result of the prisoners being unable to determine whether someone ...
In his book titled Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Michel Foucault explores the beginning of the modern-day prison system and the culture of surveillance that it has created. Foucault argues that the modern penal system is one that executes mental and psychological punishment w...
Michel Foucault’s essay, “Panopticism”, links to the idea of “policing yourself” or many call it panopticon. The panopticon is a prison which is shaped like a circle with a watchtower in the middle. The main purpose of the panopticon was to monitor a large group of prisoners with only few guards in the key spot. From that key spot, whatever the prisoners do they can be monitored, and they would be constantly watched from the key spot inside the tower. The arrangement of panopticon is done in excellent manner that the tower’s wide windows, which opened to the outside and kept every cell in 360-degree view. The cells were designed so it makes impossible for the prisoners to glances towards the center. In short, none of the prisoners were able to see into the tower. The arrangement of cells guaranteed that the prisoner would be under constant surveillance. This is the beauty of the panopticon that anyone can glance at the cells from the tower but no prisoners can see the tower. The prisoners may feel like someone is watching, and know the he or she is powerless to escape its watch, but the same time, the guard in the tower may not be looking at the prisoners. Just because the prisoners think that someone is watching them, they will behave properly.