All People are Evil in Lord of the Flies by William Golding

722 Words2 Pages

The Lord of the Flies is a standard read in American high schools, because of the deep philosophical meaning that William Golding, the author, crafted it with. Golding was a philosopher who believed that all humans are evil and only civilization is keeping mankind from descending into savagery. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, however, said that humans had an innate sense of compassion, and goodness. Golding’s novel, The Lord of the Flies, expertly shows Golding’s view of the world and human nature. I, personally, think that Golding’s thoughts on humankind are more correct than Rousseau’s, though I don’t agree with everything that he wrote. Rousseau and Golding have different views of mankind, but both philosophies influenced The Lord of the Flies, and that is why it is a classic novel that is still read today.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau was a philosopher and composer who lived in 18th century Geneva, and was famous for his belief in the goodness of human nature. Rousseau proposed that humans are innately good, and that all corruption is a result of human society. Without rules, he believed, the “savage man” would still have compassion, and not wish to kill anything unless entirely necessary. (Jones, voices.yahoo.com) Rousseau’s positive outlook on human nature is believed to have stemmed from the cultural explosion that happened during the Enlightenment, which occurred during his lifetime.
William Golding was born in 1911 in England, and grew up to be a prolific writer, philosopher, and poet. (Nobel Media, nobelprize.org) His most well-known novel, The Lord of the Flies, accurately depicts his philosophy on the evilness of man. Golding believed very different things from Rousseau, but was heavily influenced by him, though the Frenchman lived ...

... middle of paper ...

...9 days, and all of them were able to make it out safely, but only because they had strict rules, and a leader. (Kluger, content.time.com) I think that this real life scenario demonstrates that with rules, humans remain civilized beings, and society doesn’t cause evil in mankind as Rousseau stated.

Man has always been in search of answers to deep questions, and the nature of mankind is one of those. Golding and Rousseau developed two very different answers to that age old question. Golding’s views are represented in his novel by the title character, “The Lord of the Flies.” Even though the two men have very different views of society and its effects on man, I think that neither Golding nor Rousseau is wrong in their beliefs. I personally agree more with Golding, but it is obvious that these two men’s philosophies are as timeless as the book that they inspired.

Open Document