Russian Reforms In The 19th Century

886 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Similarities between tsarist and soviet russia

In the 19th century, Tsarist Russia was in need of various significant reforms and changes. Westernizers and Slavophiles had varied points of view about how Russia should be governed and what to be done with the crumbling country. Slavophiles believed in conserving traditional Russian autocracy and Russian culture and tradition, while Westernizers sought to modernize and adopt western beliefs and systems. These two viewpoints can be generalized into two main categories; liberal and conservative. From the years 1855-1881, Alexander II led the autocracy. He was known to by many as the “great reformer”, because he emancipated the serfs and put in place many other radical reforms. After the assassination of Alexander II, his son, Alexander …show more content…

Although many policies were tweaked and changed, the extensive power of the autocracy was not affected by the reforms. The government reform that Alexander II established was made up of local governments that divided the country into provinces and districts, which each province and district was then put under the control of government systems referred to as zemstvas and dumas. This strengthened the autocracy by allowing Russia to have a more organized control over the country. Although this reform, and many others, improved not only public health, but literacy rates, and mortality rates as well. Nonetheless, because of the overwhelming power within the autocracy, the reforms do not change the simple fact that the tsar can overrule any decisions made anywhere within government. The Orthodox church during both the rule of Alexander II and Alexander III, had a special relationship with the autocracy, allowing it to use the church to manipulate and influence the public. The Orthodox church acted as a process used by the Tsar to influence loyalty to the tsar through preaching. Alexander II, in one way or another had to put in place some reforms, his reforms were ultimately to modernize the least he had to. Alexander II realized that some reform was necessary to enhance nationalism, and to keep all groups in the population in some way satisfied, all

Show More
Related

  • The Legacy of Russia and the Soviet Union - Authoritarian and Repressive Traditions that Refuse to

    1785 Words  | 4 Pages

    Historically, Russia has always been a country of perplexing dualities. The reality of Dual Russia, the separation of the official culture from that of the common people, persisted after the Revolution of 1917 and the Civil War. The Czarist Russia was at once modernized and backward: St. Petersburg and Moscow stood as the highly developed industrial centers of the country and two of the capitals of Europe, yet the overwhelming majority of the population were subsistent farms who lived on mir; French was the official language and the elites were highly literate, yet 82% of the populati...

    Read More

  • Tensions in Russia in the Early 1900

    448 Words  | 1 Pages

    In 1900, Russia was an autocracy led by a Tsar who had a total control over the country. The Tsar was Nicholas II. Along with his family and all other nobles, he was very wealthy and lived in luxury. Other wealthy groups of people were: Ÿ Upper class- Church leaders and lesser nobles. Ÿ Commercial class- Bankers, factory workers all known as capitalists.

    Read More

  • How Much Russia Changed from 1856-1894

    604 Words  | 2 Pages

    When recognised as being an ageing superpower by Alexander II it was inevitable that some sort of change would take place in Russia in the hope of modernisation. We can see that the changes were mostly political and economical. During Alexander III’s reign we can see that the changes were suppressive although it ultimately led to further change in the form of revolution in the future.

    Read More

  • Russia in the 1930s

    1648 Words  | 4 Pages

    Russia in the 1930s By 1928, Stalin had ousted Trotsky and the rest of the Left opposition. In four years, Stalin had single handedly taken major steps away from Lenin’s collective leadership and free inter-party debate and replaced them with his autocratic dictatorship. Stalin began to secure predominant power over the communist party and the state by destroying passive opposition from the peasantry and former Lenin supporters. He won growing support from the working class, who were impressed with the initial five-year plan. It promised increased industrialization, which would lead to socialism in one country within their lifetime.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Crane Brinton's The Anatomy Of Revolution

    1532 Words  | 4 Pages

    While most of Europe had develop strong central governments and weakened the power of the nobles, Russia had lagged behind the times and still had serfs as late as 1861. The economic development that followed the emancipation of peasants in the rest of Europe created strong industrial and tax bases in those nations. Russian monarchs had attempted some level of reforms to address this inequality for almost a century before, and were indeed on their way to “economic maturity” (32) on par with the rest of Europe. But they overextended themselves and the crushing defeats of the Russo-Japanese War in 1905 and the First World War in 1917 lost them the necessary support from their subjects and created “high prices and scarcity” which were by far “the most obvious factors in the general tension”

    Read More

  • The Effect of the Bolshevik Rule on Russian Culture

    443 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Effect of the Bolshevik Rule on Russian Culture Bolshevik cultural policy was based on spreading their values to the population. They attempted to promote equality to create a classless society. In addition to removing class differences they attempted to give equal status to women and to young people. In order to encourage women to work state funded crèches were established and laws passed to give women parity in terms of pay with men. The state tried to destroy the old concept of families by legalising abortion and enabling people to obtain divorces much more simply.

    Read More

  • The Civil War's Impact on Russian Political Transformation, 1855-1964

    331 Words  | 1 Pages

    The most important war in relation to political change of 1855 to 1964 would be the Civil War (1917 – 1922) because it directly led to the Bolsheviks taking power in Russia implanting new ideologies (communism) into the state as well as forming of the USSR and dismantling state religion. For example take this quote from the declaration of the rights of the people of Russia which was drafted by the first Bolshevik government in 1917 "resolve to establish as a basis for its activity in the question of nationalities the following principles will be applied: Equality and sovereignty of peoples of Russia, Right of peoples of Russia of a free self-determination, including secession and formation of a separate state and Abolition of all national and religious privileges and restrictions" This shows that there were political changes in Russian society that would never happen if not the Bolsheviks got in power. The dismantling of state religion shows that the new Bolshevik government were taking strides in replacing the old political structure of society which consisted of state religion and heavily autocratic state Duma with new Soviet administration's at every level of society including the military and at industrial level which ensured a secular Marxist state.

    Read More

  • How successful was Alexander II’s Edict on Emancipation of the Serfs in modernizing Russia in the years 1861-1881?

    3275 Words  | 7 Pages

    The main challenge Alexander II faced in his projects towards modernization of Russia was a compromise between advancing his state thorough improving the lives of his subjects, without falling prey to the demand for further reforms he would be unable to satisfy. Westwood, revisiting Russian History in 1981 phrased the problem as follows: “how to advance the education of the state by educating the people, without educating the people to questions the state? ”.

    Read More

  • The Westernizer and Slavophile Disparity

    1219 Words  | 3 Pages

    The 19th century was a highly turbulent time in Russia’s history. Following the defeat of Napoleonic France, Western ideas and philosophy crept into Russian culture. As a result, Russian nobles split into two schools of thought. Slavophiles valued Russia’s traditional Orthodox Church, and did not want to Westernize and secede to the supposed superiority of Western culture. Conversely, Westernizers were a group of nobles who were against the traditional Russian values, and believed that the only way forward was to look to Europe. The Westernizers and the Slavophiles disagreed on a deep level about the direction Russia needed to take in the future. Russian thinkers were split between the Westernizer and the Slavophile point of view; both sides disagreed about the true nature of the country as well as its relation with the West.

    Read More

  • Essay On The 1905 Revolution

    1429 Words  | 3 Pages

    future leader of the Soviet Union as a “dress rehearsal” for the 1917 revolution. The most important difference is that the 1905 revolution failed to destroy the autocracy in Imperial Russia. A combination of reasons can explain why this revolution failed at overthrowing the Tsar Nikolas the Second. The revolutions participants were not revolutionaries that wanted to overthrow the Tsar, it was not started by revolutionary groups. The military and military context played an important role to the revolution’s failure, and the autocracy’s reforms gave compromise to the protestors who could be satisfied with the changes. These factors show why the 1905 revolution failed to destroy the autocracy.

    Read More

  • The Similarities of Tsarist and Communist Rule in Russia

    1871 Words  | 4 Pages

    Alexander II used very little. He had emancipated the serfs, created the zemstva and allowed freedom of religion. Alexander III most resembled Stalin by using the most central controls. He also increased the power of his Predecessors secret police, renaming them the Okrana. The Okrana were similar to Stalin’s secret police (NKVD.) Both were violent against minority groups and Russian’s opposing the state.

    Read More

  • Peter the Great Reformer

    820 Words  | 2 Pages

    Peter the Great was the czar of Russia between 1682 and 1725. He began to influence Russia’s development almost immediately after becoming czar and transformed Russia from an isolated agricultural society into an Empire on a par with European powers. Under his reign, existed a period of significant reforms, because of their major effects, which were constructive, useful and beneficial to his country. Peter’s reforms, especially, in the area of education, revealed his actions as pertaining to the characteristics of a reformer. The modernization of Russia was mostly based on Europeanization, which brought elements from Europe into Russia. After being defeated by both Sweden and the Ottomans, it became clear to Peter that creating a navy and modernizing the military would be important, if Russia was to become a more dominant and influential country. Shortly after becoming Czar, Peter began to visit European countries to observe their culture. He was impressed by it’s modernness and, as a result, brought these influences back to Russia in an attempt to make Russia reach the same heights. His reforms ranged from Educational and militaristic to simple things, like having Russian men shave their beards to look more European. He knew that major changes needed to transpire in Russia, if it was to become a dominant European power. Many scholars from Peter’s day, described him as either a reformer or revolutionary because of his goal to modernize and transform Russia for the better. Some of the reforms that he passed include a church reform, economic reform and government reforms. A reformer is someone who is devoted to bringing about political, social, and other reforms. A revolutionary, however, is someone who is engaged in promoting a...

    Read More

  • The Tsarist System of Government of Russia

    955 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Tsarist System of Government of Russia I believe that throughout history, the Tsars felt threatened. They then reformed in order to stay in power, and to stay in for power alone. However, this mindset only had an effect when the Tsar's power was threatened. Nevertheless, I believe that to find the factors that had an effect on the Russian system of government, one must look for the reason why felt threatened. Here war was an important factor, however it was not the only factor.

    Read More

  • 1917 Russian Revolution Essay

    1101 Words  | 3 Pages

    Russia had been defeated in all except the war with Turkey and its government and economy had the scars to prove it. A severe lack of food and poor living conditions amongst the peasant population led firstly to strikes and quickly escalated to violent riots. Tsar Nicholas II ruled Russia with an iron hand while much of Europe was moving away from the monarchical system of rule. All lands were owned by the Tsar’s family and Nobel land lords, while the factories and industrial complexes were owned by the capitalists’. There were no unions or labour laws and the justice system had made almost all other laws in favour of the ruling elite.

    Read More

  • Emancipation: Unsuccessful Or Successful?

    2021 Words  | 5 Pages

    Some may argue that Emancipation was an ultimately successful endeavour as it brought about both fundamental and necessary change, and whilst it is true that there were various factors that ensured the development of Russia from a backward thinking and archaic nation that relied very much on what was -in flourishing western countries – a repressive and outdated feudal system, the ill-considered and very evidently selfish way in which this much needed reform was executed meant that despite some factors, from which the development and modernisation of Russia’s class system itself were enabled, for Alexander II were exactly the opposite of what he had been – perhaps covertly – attempting to achieve. For this reason it is difficult to claim Emancipation

    Read More

More about Russian Reforms In The 19th Century

Open Document