Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of community participation
Importance of community participation
social inequality based on economic factors
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of community participation
The aim of economic growth is to deliver prosperities. However, in Sustainable Development Commission Report, Professor Tim Jackson argues that, continuous and infinite growth in a physically finite word is impossible and the pursuit of it comes with great environmental and social costs. He then proposed redefining prosperity and alternative routs to achieve prosperity for all without the conventional rout of continuous economic growth. Economic growth has delivered prosperities and the world population has unmistakably benefited from it. But it had delivered prosperities unequally. In the last few decades, inequality has become much higher in OECD nations. In the meanwhile, one fifth of the world live is earning just 2% of global income, while the rich are getting increasingly richer and middle class income has fallen flat. The global economy …show more content…
Prosperity should not be just increasing material wealth, it should also be about giving and receiving love, enjoying life by doing meaningful work and enjoying the respecting of peers and having the connection to the community. For humans to flourish while reducing consumption won’t be an easy task, however it offers the best alternative prospect that we have for a lasting prosperity. Jackson also counter argued against the concept of decoupling. There are two types of decoupling; relative and absolute. Because capitalists economic are supposed to increase efficiency, as economy grows the impacts that economy make on the environment will decrease relative to GDP growth. The energy required to produced has declined by one third in the last decade. During the same time, energy use has increased by 40%. Relatively speaking global carbon intensity has fallen compare to the growth in GDP however, in absolute term resource impacts have increased
Kim, Jim Yong et al. (2000). Dying for Growth: Global Inequality and the Health of the Poor. Cambridge: Common Courage Press.
“The world holds enough to satisfy everyone’s need but not everyone’s greed,” Mahatma Gandhi once astutely observed. In a few carefully chosen words, Gandhi pointed out the reason behind economic tension. For example, “Poverty, hunger, homelessness, illiteracy, preventable disease, polluted air and water, and most of the other ills that beset humanity have the same root cause: the inequitable distribution of the planet's wealth and resources” (Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, All social and economic problems caused by an unfair distribution of wealth). Additionally, our economic system—unregulated capitalism—advocates and defends a wantonly unequal distribution of wealth. For instance in 2010, “The top 400 people (.0000013% of the population) held more wealth than the bottom 60% combined” (Brian Rogel, Unequal Distribution of Wealth). The top 1 percent has grown richer while inversely affecting the general population. “From 1983-2009 the bottom 60% have had a decrease in both their perce...
Although globalization induces worldwide inequality in many aspects such as educational inequality and income inequality, the most serious one is income inequality since it exacerbates the wealth gap and consequently causes severe social problems. The world GDP has risen from 36 percent to 55 percent since 1980 as a result of the expanding world trade caused by globalization (Lall, Jaumotte, Papageorgiou & Topalova, 2007). Global Domestic income has increased, but the income distribution across the continents appears to be unequal. For instance, in the United States (U.S.), among the income distribution, the bottom 20 percent have an income boost of only 3.7 percent while the top 5 percent enjoy an income boost of 57 percent (Kearney, 2014). Furthermore, this widened wealth gap makes the people in poverty become poorer and has resulted in many serious social problems. According to Thorbecke and Charumilind (2002), the crime rate may become higher since “legal wages represent the opportunity cost to crime”. Also, because the level of income has a positive and explicit correlation with the health condition, the poor’s average life expectancy may become shorter. Therefore, the income inequality is severe since it increases the wealth gap and gen...
Inequality matters because the degree of inequality coupled with national income determines the extent of poverty (Perkins). The 1990s showed the first signs of narrowing inequality since the Industrial Revolution. Despite recent progress in inequality reduction, the average inequality within countries is greater now than it was 25 years ago. Latin America, the Caribbean, and sub-Saharan Africa stand out as regions with exceptionally high inequality. For example, the global poverty gap is about 3%, while the gap in sub-Saharan Africa is around 16% (WB REPORT). Moreover, by 2001, the poverty gap had fallen to single digits in every region but sub-Saharan Africa, where it actually increased (Perkins). Typically, this increase in inequality occurs because the income share of the top income groups expanding rapidly (WB REPORT). Other causes of inequality involve a legacy of racist policies (e.g., apartheid in South Africa) and mineral wealth (Perkins). A significant amount of falling global inequality has resulted from the rapid growth of China and India, two populous countries that achieved remarkable economic growth in recent history (WB
Historically inequality has helped the United States greatly in respect to economic growth, recently however it has gotten to a point where it is becoming dangerously counterproductive. Although, upward capital mobility continues to occur, most of this mobility is reaped by those who are already flourishing at the top. An unequal spread of wealth can create mixed emotions for citizens. With only a small percentage truly benefiting from inequality growth in America these emotions are not always positive. As shown in Professor
Globalization is another cause for the gap between the upper and lower class. By design, it is and will always be a guise for influencing developing countries into selling their resources. Unfortunately, this causes developing countries to experience economic growth stunts that affect anyone that does not benefit from the exchange of resources. The dilemma becomes and are focusing strategizes to ...
“Why the Rich are getting Richer and the Poor, Poorer” written by Robert Reich, describes as the title says, why the rich are getting richer and the poor, poorer. In Reich’s essay he delves into numerous reasons and gives examples of each. It makes one wonder if the world will continue on the path of complete economic separation between the rich and the poor.
If economic growth is strong enough—enlarging the pie by a sufficient amount—then even though the slices going to the poor and the middle class are comparatively skinnier, they still end up with more pie. The mistake that decriers of inequality make is to assume that the economic pie is fixed, so that a bigger slice for the top must necessarily result in less pie for everyone else. In fact, the evidence from economic research over the past 15 years is that in developed countries, more inequality tends to go hand in hand with stronger economic growth.
What do people in other countries need to do to be treated fairly by outsourcing companies? Have you ever thought about the effects large companies such as Marine Atlantic have on labourers on the ship breaking profession? These “transnational” monopoly companies are the only ones benefiting from this, what sustainable prosperity is there when you can’t even afford the food on your table?
The article explains that income disparity is among the current challenges affecting most developed and developing nations. The article explains the importance of the legislators and economists to concentrate on improving incomes of the lower class and middle class social classes. Research conducted in by these authors reveals that income disparities affect economic growth and sustainability. Increase in income for the bottom category of income distribution has a positive influence on the GDP of America. However a similar increase to the 20% of the highest earners results to drop in GDP if the 80% low earners” income drops. This therefore means that income disparity has severe consequences in economic growth. The research therefore concludes that income disparity is an evil that must be tackled appropriately.
The last one is represented as the poorest in economic terms; it is therefore characterized by a high-income inequality between the two opposite classes. However, since the early 2000s, Developing countries like Asia, Latin America and Eastern Europe developed their economic resources by a me-dian of 14% every year. In comparison, developed countries including America and Eastern Europe made benefits of only 3% per year (Neiger, 2010). Nonetheless, the gap between the rich and the poor is still considerable and according to Amina Mohammed, evidence was given that the region which will be the most disturbed by the growing income inequality is Asia with 25% (Mohammed, 2014).
national election. On one level, income inequality is a non-issue in a market economy where there will always be winners and losers. In a market where individuals are free to make choices and reap the rewards of the choices they make, it is a given that some will wind up with more than others. We cannot all be equal because we don’t all have the same natural endowments. Those with certain skills and abilities will often wind up with more than those without. And those who went to school to train for specific occupations that pay well will earn more than those who did not. In short, skilled workers will earn more than non-skilled workers. Consequently, in an increasingly global economy where there will be two classes — skilled and educated workers at the top earning high wages and unskilled and poorly educated workers at the bottom earning low wages — there is bound to be inequality. Moreover, as these trends continue, the gap between the top and the bottom is only bound to grow. On another level, however, income inequality is a seminal issue because of what it really speaks to: the disappearance of the middle class. Inequality per se may not be the problem; rather it is the rate of increase in
Rostow's five stages of economic growth begin with the traditional society. As described by Rostow, the underdevelopment is naturalised in this structure with the evidence of constrained production means such as technology. In this part, the society applies subsistence economy that technically results in small margins of productivity such as hunter-gatherer society (Sahlins 1972:1) Undesired to do nature exploitation, Rostow viewed society at this stage as restrained from progress. The second phase following the previous stage is preconditions of take-off. Economic growth starting to take place and is essential to justify the means within good definition. The society begins to implement the manufacturing of products while at the same time foreign intervention by advanced societies such as through colonialism is needed to bring about change in one's society. The next step towards moder...
There are at least four different research perspectives about the relationship between development and economic growth. Firstly, economic growth is the basis for social development. Secondly, economic growth and social development are not necessarily linked. Thirdly, both economic growth and social development are not basic causes by each other, but they depend on interaction. Fourthly, social development is the prerequisite for economic growth (Mazumdar. 1...
The Relationship between Globalization, Economic Growth and Income Inequality. (2010, January). TEMEP Discussion Paper. Retrieved from ftp://147.46.237.98/DP-51.pdf