Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
marxist criticism introduction
marxism critical theory essay
marxism critical theory essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: marxist criticism introduction
Art can be interpreted in varying ways. One could take the Kantian approach by placing special importance on art’s autonomy, while proclaiming that art prescribes to its own set of self-created maxims. These maxims facilitate the creation of normative idea of art, where excellent is determined by how well it meets arts self-created maxims. Therefore the Mona Lisa is only a good painting because it greatly conforms to the maxims of the art normative. Another approach would be the Hegelian interpretation that states that art is the “highest human vocation.” In this way art shows humanity normative of human existence in a way that shows the worthiness of human society. However, there is a problem with both sets of interpretation—they associated with the Enlightenment. This problem proves to be a fatal flaw, and only with a mixture of both is it possible to fully ascertain art. It was using this method that Theodore Adorno’s philosophy was able to accomplish art in its fullest.
Theodore Adorno (1903-1969) was a German philosopher, literary critic, and social theorist. He was an influential member of the Frankfurt School, which developed the notion of critical theory. Critical Theory is a sociological based theory of interpretation. That held that attempts to comprehend “society as a dialectical entity.” It rejects the notion through empiricism a true interpretation of society can be found. Instead it suggests that any interpretation of society needs to be interdisciplinary, taking into account “economics, psychology, history and philosophy.” The Frankfurt school would employ Critical Theory within the scope of Marxist ideology. Seeing history as the story of changing modes of production, and society a place of class struggle bet...
... middle of paper ...
...rces:
Adorno, Theodor W. Aesthetic Theory. Reprint; 1970. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Universtiy of Minnesota Press, 1997.
Secondary Sources:
Bolaños, Paolo A. "The Critical Role of Art: Adorno Between Utopia and Dystopia ." KRITIKE 1, no. 1 (June 2007): 25-31.
Callaghan, Jennefer. Theodore Adorno . Spring 2000. http://english.emory.edu/Bahri/Adorno.html (accessed November 30, 2011).
Geuss, Raymond. "Art and Criticism in Adorno's Aesthetics ." European Journal of Philosophy (Black Well ) 6, no. 3 (1998 ): 297-317.
Surber, Jere Paul. Culture and Critique: An Introduction to the Critical Discourses of Cultureal Studies. Boulder , Colorado: Westview Press, 1998 .
The Metropolitan Museum of Art. The Unicorn Is Found (from the Unicorn Tapestries). 2000-2011. http://www.metmuseum.org/collections/search-the-collections/70007564 (accessed Novemeber 30, 2011).
-Greenberg, Clement, “Avant-Garde & Kitsch” (first published 1939) Art and Culture: Critical Essays (Boston: Beacon Press, 1939) pp.3-21
Eco, Umberto. Art and Beauty in the Middle Ages. Trans. Hugh Bradin. New Haven: Yale UP, 1986.
(1) See "Judgment, Aesthetic" in A Companion to Aesthetics edited by David Cooper (Basil Blackwell, Oxford: 1992).
Questioning Marxist aesthetics is essential to an understanding of the enlightenment movements. Art, in its nearly infinite forms, is the vehicle for knowledge of a subjective kind. Through visual, linguistic, audio, or dance any number of messages and ideas may be conveyed, and these ideas may then be interoperated. The aesthetic form is what constitutes good or great art. It puts forth a structure by which one can judge a piece beyond the mere technical skill that is presented in it, though that is an important issue. The aesthetic form puts forth the notion that art sublimates reality, creating another reality that brings into question this one. Creating this fictional reality is the responsibility of art. According to Marcuse “renunciation of the aesthetic form is abdication
Goldwater, Robert and Marco Treves (eds.). Artists on Art: from the XIV to the XX Century. New York: Pantheon Books, 1945.
Varnedoe, Kirk. A Fine Disregard: What Makes Modern Art Modern. New York: H.N. Abrams, 1990. 152. Print.
Gray, Ann, and Jim McGuigan. 1997. Studying Culture: An Introductory Reader. 2nd edn. London: Arnold, pp. 35-41.
In conclusion, Adorno views the sociological impact of the musical work as a crucial component of his critical writings. Through his analysis of Wagner, Adorno is able to ascertain the commodification of art as arising from aesthetic modernism itself. Adorno’s reception of Wagner has received critical attention from scholars in various disciplines and many musicologists disagree with Adorno’s combination of aesthetic and ideological criticisms – although ironically this method mirrors Adorno's argument that in the artwork aesthetics and ideology are inseparably intertwined.
Art is trapped in the cage of society, constantly being judged and interpreted regardless of the artist’s intent. There is no escaping it, however, there are ways to manage and manipulate the cage. Two such examples are Kandinsky 's Little Pleasures, and Marcel Duchamp’s Fountain. Both pieces were very controversial and judged for being so different in their time, but they also had very specific ways of handling the criticism and even used it to their advantage. We will be looking at the motivations for each artwork, what made the art so outrageous, and the public’s reaction to the pieces.
Janson, Harry W. History of Art. 5th Ed. New York: Harry N. Abrams, 1995. Print.
Barnett, Peter. “The French Revolution in Art”. ArtId, January 7th 2009. Web. 5th May 2013.
Stone, W. F. (1897). Questions on the philosophy of art;. London: Printed by William Clowes and Sons.
Solso, Robert L. The Psychology of Art and the Evolution of the Concious Brain. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT P. 13-21.
Goldblatt, and Brown. Aesthetics: A Reader in Philosophy of the Arts, Upper Saddle Ridge, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1997.