Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of standardized tests
Standardized testing and its effects
What do experts say on getting rid of standardized tests
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of standardized tests
Standardized Tests Are Insufficient
*No Works Cited
"Anyone involved in education should be concerned about how overemphasis on the SAT is distorting educational priorities and practices, how the test is perceived by many as unfair, and how it can have a devastating impact on the self-esteem and aspirations of young students," said University of California President Richard C. Atkinson in a speech he gives to the American Council on Education in Washington, D.C.
I really didn't enjoy taking the SATs. SAT I cannot represent the individual knowledge of one particular test-taker, because the tests have been dissected in many prep-classes, designed to improve a student's score. However, these classes can be very expensive and give students who can afford the classes an unfair advantage. I scored well, but I hated all the drills to prepare; hated getting up early for it and hated being assigned to a testing site, which is far away from where I live. Inside the testing room, invigilators spend half an hour going through the forms and repeating basic test instructions and rules that we already know. One student raised his hand for a question, “sh … no questions allowed until the examiner comes around!” one invigilator answered without caring whether it was an emergency or not.
While you can take the test as many times as you want, to do so is costly, and often, I think scores no longer represent students' test-taking skills more than students' knowledge. Moreover, common standardized tests like the SAT I tests students in only two subject areas, math and verbal. Not enough! Students spend immeasurable amounts of money yearly taking preparatory classes for a test that does not really cover the content covered in schools, but does ...
... middle of paper ...
...stead of getting rid of the SAT entirely, the test itself should be reformed. Instead of trying to sweep the SAT under the table, the UC Regents should lead an effort to make the SAT better. Also, using other methods such as essays, or a face-to-face interview would help neutralize the side effect of standardized tests. If we feel the standard testing system is broken, and it is, they should make an effort to fix it, not forget it.
In general, there is a need for a national standardized test. The switch to this new standardized testing method would have to be coupled with patience from students and university administrators. For instance, should have a standardized test that provides them an opportunity to show their strengths. There are many other ways of giving a test, but what's important is what the score really reveals, one's test-skills or one's knowledge.
Michele Obama once stated, “If my future were determined just by my performance on a standardized test, I wouldn 't be here. I guarantee you that.” The First Lady is, in other words, to say that standardized testing was a major factor into her life’s outcome and her scores could have potentially not put her in her position of power that she is highly recognized in today’s society. Although standardized tests do play a large role in any college application, standardized testing may not count as much toward one’s college admissions or success because standardized tests are not the only factor toward college applications, these tests only benefit a specific target group of people, and standardized tests are better used for giving insight on one’s
... a tedious process, but the change can have immense, positive effects for the future college student. The ACT and SAT that supposedly measure a student's learning potential through multiple-choice questions should be replaced by a test of a student's desire to learn determined through the analysis of essays, recommendation letters, and school or community involvement. This change can result in a more academically motivated freshman class. Standardized testing in its current form does not accurately measure most students' learning potential. It does not allow for diversity and creates a huge hurdle for many potential academic achievers. An adjustment to a diverse, open testing format of the ACT or SAT and a stress on the student's other academic accomplishments can accurately measure the student's desire to learn, therefore measuring the student's learning potential.
The SAT's have sometimes been the deciding factor when determining a student's admission to a certain college, but recently colleges have stopped regarding SAT scores as the most important factor, and in some cases, colleges are now not even requiring applicants to submit their scores. This change in significance of the SAT's is due to recent controversy over the fairness of the test. According to Fair Test (2001) three hundred and eighty-eight schools do not require applicants to submit their SAT scores, and hundreds more do not place much emphasis on the scores. Because of the recent controversy and the number of schools not looking at or de-emphasizing the SAT's, the College Board, (the company in charge of designing, administering, and grading the test), has decided to make several changes to the format of the SAT's (which was just revised in 1994). These changes will take effect in the year 2005.
Many students feel stressed out when having to take standardized testing. According to Kaplan, colleges are relying too much on the SAT and ACT. They are using a long test that becomes equally weighted to years of school. That seems to be a little lopsided. A student can do well through out all high school and then score badly on the SAT or ACT and ruin all of the hard work that the student put forward in order to acquire good grades. That can alter the students lives by making them have to...
How standardized are standardized tests? In America, we strive to perfect them as well as give our students an education they deserve but at what cost? Standardized tests have been the easiest way to ultimately evaluate a student against every other student in America. However, standardized tests are not as great as they are made out to be. We need to take a step back and look at the faults of standardized tests. Quite simply: Standardized tests are not standardized.
Standardized testing assesses students, teachers, and the school itself, which puts a great deal of pressure on the students. High scores show that the school is effective in teaching students, while low test scores make teachers and schools look as though they are not teaching the students properly. This is not always the case. There are teachers who do teach students what they need to know to pass the test, but their students are still unprepared. Although teachers try to improve instruction, student performance is still variable to other factors that the school cannot control.
Although the SAT seems like a good measure and is used by many colleges and universities, it is not a good way to measure a student's ability and should be abolished because it has some problems. The ideas that show the problems are the not-balance fact between black students and white students that have taken the SAT, the fact that shows that a student's parent's income affects a student's SAT score, the fact about the incorrectness of the SAT scores that some students took in October 2005, and about the score which does not measure someone's ability or future.
The format of the questions in the SAT are not similar to what students are used to in school. The subjects being tested might be the same as the ones taught in schools but the problems are structured differently than the form students have experienced in high school classes. When asking a current senior in high school about the format of the SAT questions the response was, “each question on the test felt like a trick question. The questions were not straight forward and all the answers seemed to be good enough to be the right answer. All the knowledge I gained from high school felt useless to the puzzle in each question.” Over the years SAT has been more and more disconnected from the work of high schools. Students have to study for school and the SAT separately. The SAT as a whole is deeply flaw...
Standardized testing has a long history. Testing began in China in 2200 BC, where students took literary tests to determine their future (Dolezalek 24-25). Thousands of years later in America, immigrants took tests to determine where to place them in school to better integrate them (Dominique). In the 1930s, the first state assessment was formed. Dolezalek writes about the Iowa Every-Pupil Testing program that influenced other states to create standardized tests. Iowa started the testing trend, which really boomed in 1940. Seven years later the Educational Testing service was founded, which determined if students were admitted to college and if they received scholarships (27-28). Today, we use tests to compare students nationally and to rate
In today’s world every human being needs some form of education to survive, weather being informal, formal, home schooled, private schooled or publicly schooled. Humans need some type of skills and learning experiences in their lives for personal growth as well. There are millions of students who attend private and public school each year. All of these students will be required to take some sort of standardized test throughout their educational career to measure their progress or achievement level. The federal government requires students to take standardized test at least once a year in the following subjects: Math, English, Science, and History. The test can vary based on each state, each students ability and language level. Testing is a normal common part of a school’s environment in order to measure achievement. However it is not good when the curriculum, teachers, administrator and government officials get so immerse into the results of the test that they lose focus on teaching the subject and start teaching them how to pass the test. Should the government continue to administer high-stakes test for accountability reasons or should they abolished them all-together is the question?
You may not think about it but Standardized testing is quite expensive. According to Huffing Post and edweek.org Standardized testing cost 1.7 million dollars annually. That is a LOT of money with that we could be doing much more productive things. Also Standardized testing is very timely. According to wbur.org kids takes about 20-25 hours. With this time students are only reviewing things they ALREADY learned when they could be learning something new. Standardized Testing is also a bad situation that can be changed with a little bit of effort. If we stop standardized testing many good things will happen. For Example teachers will stop feeling pressured to teach to the Standardized test so they do not get fired. According to LAtimes.com Standardized tests do not help evaluate teachers. people are actually already trying to change this according to Radio,inc Republicain senate aids are drafting a bill to eliminate standardized testing. With the immense cost of standardized testing we could be putting money toward extra-curricular activities or better supplies. The possibilities are endless. That means that standardized test is something we could change and could make a better situation out
Because of the stress put on students, via the SAT and tests like it, testing anxiety has been at an all time high. Should high school students be subject to anxiety and mental disorders as a result of a single “aptitude” test? Stress about tests and hours of study as a result (as many students, including myself, have faced) has only harmed test scores and student’s mental health. (fatherhoodchannel.com) In addition, the portions of the SAT, specifically math, contain fields of study most students learn in middle school. The Math portion of the SAT mostly contains content from Geometry and Math 1, subjects most students are introduced to in the 8th and 9th grade. Additionally, the calculator inactive portion of the test is arguably irrelevant, seeing as in a workplace, one would never be forced to solve problems without the help of technology. English portion mainly tests grammar and word usage rules, again mostly taught to 8th and 9th graders or looked over in general. Finally the reading portion is based on ‘comprehension’ questions instead of deeper thinking questions most 11th graders are used to studying. Is it fair to test students on information from years ago and expect them to remember? (Dr. Michele Hernandez, huffingtonpost.com) What the SAT is supposed to measure, aptitude, has come to be interpreted as
Standardized testing is not an effective way to test the skills and abilities of today’s students. Standardized tests do not reveal what a student actually understands and learns, but instead only prove how well a student can do on a generic test. Schools have an obligation to prepare students for life, and with the power standardized tests have today, students are being cheated out of a proper, valuable education and forced to prepare and improve their test skills. Too much time, energy, and pressure to succeed are being devoted to standardized tests. Standardized testing, as it is being used presently, is a flawed way of testing the skills of today’s students.
Standardized testing does not let students show how capable they truly are. School Districts in Washington State should remove the testing so that students are able to express their work ethics in a better way than a single test score. The SAT and ACT tests are all tests that every student will most likely take, the test is the same for everyone. The test is completely multiple choice questions, except for the writing part of the test. By the test having multiple choice questions, it is not a valid way of showing off a student’s knowledge. It is easier to guess on an answer or look off someone else’s test when you only have 4 answers to choose from. By letting students express themselves in a more efficient way the School Districts in Washington State would have more successful students. Having the student write out how they got a math answer or explain their reasoning behind what they think about the passage is a stronger answer than picking A,B, C or D on a test sheet. When they explain why they got the answer they did, it lets them show how their brain works and what kind of student they are. The school district should not continue with standardized testing because it does not validly express how a student can perform and what...
After reading this article, I thought about my experience with standardized testing and the anxiety they caused me. Prior to taking the SAT in high school, teachers and academic advisors emphasized the importance of this test. They drilled into our young minds that the test determined our future. The school system offered SAT prep courses and after school tutoring from teachers. Additionally, with all of this extra support I was still unable to trust my outcome points after taking the first test and applied for two more chances. Later on, I continued my unbalanced emotional decisions with the GRE and took it three times (even though the first outcome was enough). After each test I took I had the same questions boggling in my mind: Was the anxiety