One objection to my argument might be that even in the Smith and Jones example there is a difference between killing and letting die. Since Jones did not physically do anything to the child, and did not take part in any action that intentionally killed the child, what he did was morally permissible. Letting die is morally permissible because it does not involve the direct act of killing someone.
My response to this objection is that even though you might not be directly involved in the killing by not physically doing it, you are still at fault for a person’s death if you have the power to help and you choose not to. In the Smith and Jones case, Jones still had the intention to kill his younger cousin and would have killed him had he not fallen into the tub and drowned on his own. The fact that Jones was able to pull the drowning child out of the tub and chose to do nothing means that what he did was mo...
... middle of paper ...
...rough at the time messes with their brain and causes them to make rash decisions. My response to this is most people, if not all, think about their death at some point throughout their lives, especially when they are terribly ill. I do believe there are cases where people might make rash decisions about wanting to die via active euthanasia or wanting the cessation of treatment, but I also know there are cases where people have put a lot of thought into this subject, sometimes even before they became ill. The fact is people are capable of making these decisions and so we cannot always say that it is simply the illness that is doing the talking. If there is a case where the person who requests euthanasia is someone who has consistently expressed that euthanasia is something they would be okay with then it is safe to assume that they are capable of making this decision.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- According to James Rachels, “both passive and active euthanasia are permissible.” (Luper and Brown, p.347). He gives a doctrine from American Medical Association quoting,” mercy killing is contrary to which the medical professional stands” (Luper and Brown, p. 347). He makes arguments against the doctrine as to why it would be rejected. One, a physician should let the patient end his life if he wants to so that the patient does not have to endure the suffering. However, Rachels says in that situation it’s better for the physician to kill the patient, rather than letting one die because using lethal injections can be painless and quick, whereas, letting one die can be a slow and painful proc... [tags: Death, Euthanasia, Morality, KILL]
1283 words (3.7 pages)
- This means that doctors must never do anything to actively kill a patient; however the doctor does have the ability to use some discretion to ease and shorten suffering (i.e. whether to take extreme measures to prolong life). As has been noted, passive euthanasia is already a generally accepted medical practice and is permissible by Canadian law. A question to ask about passive euthanasia is, “Should we put time and effort in trying to prolong life of someone whose injuries or illnesses are so severe that they will be dead despite doctor’s best efforts?”.... [tags: Death, Euthanasia, Morality, Bystander effect]
2187 words (6.2 pages)
- I have argued that both active and passive euthanasia are morally permissible, but many people are already okay with passive euthanasia because they believe the cause of death is different from active euthanasia so to some people passive euthanasia is the only morally acceptable one, and active euthanasia is the one that is morally impermissible. Both active and passive euthanasia are difficult things to accept because they both involve death and people are generally uncomfortable when it comes to that topic.... [tags: Euthanasia, Death, Morality, Suffering]
1012 words (2.9 pages)
- Rachel argues that ‘[T]he distinction between passive and active euthanasia is thought to be crucial for medical ethics. The idea is that it is permissible, at least in some cases, to withhold treatment and allow a patient to die.’ The law has drawn a clear distinction between the removal of life sustaining treatment that causes death and a request for assistance in ending life. Passive euthanasia is considered lawful whereas active euthanasia is unlawful as per the Suicide Act . In Bland a distinction was made between killing through an act and letting die through an omission.... [tags: medical ethics]
1465 words (4.2 pages)
- Utilitarianism and Euthanasia Legalizing euthanasia is one of the hot topics that are debated over and over. Euthanasia is a word derived from Greek language which means “easy death” and is defines as the practice that allow one to intentionally ends ones life and relieve from extreme pain and suffering because of terminal illnesses. Imagining ones body slowly and painfully breaking down by the hidden and uncontrollable disease. Euthanasia is the only solution to end the misery but government law prevents person to make that choice and instead place them to die slowly day by day with unbearable pain.... [tags: Utilitarianism, Suffering, Death, Euthanasia]
1158 words (3.3 pages)
- Despite passive euthanasia being more morally permissible to the majority of society, it can most certainly be argued that the action of active euthanasia results in a better consequence. Passive euthanasia is the withdrawing or withholding of a patient’s life-sustaining medication and active defined as the act of purposely bringing someone to their deaths. Through years of debate and criticism over methods of euthanasia, it has been concluded in the medical profession that the acts of euthanasia should be beneficial.... [tags: passive euthanasia, moral consequences]
1223 words (3.5 pages)
- Euthanasia is one of the most controversial moral issues in today’s society. The word euthanasia was originated from the Greek words eu (“well”) and thanatos (“death”), which means a painless and gentle death. But, the modern day definition of euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma (“General History of Euthanasia”). Euthanasia is illegal in most countries, including the United States—except in Washington, Oregon, California, Vermont and in Bernalillo County in New Mexico (Segura).... [tags: Euthanasia, Death, Suicide, Homicide]
1679 words (4.8 pages)
- The Debate on Euthanasia in the United Kingdom One of the biggest controversies in the UK today is Euthanasia. Arguments about Euthanasia often hinge on the ‘right to life’ and ‘right to die’, should it be legalised. Originally the word Euthanasia meant ‘a gentle and easy death’, however nowadays it is ‘the act of inducing an easy death’. Why the change in meaning and everybody’s new found view that Euthanasia is in fact murder. Many people have diverse views on the issue. Humanists live by moral principles and promote happiness and fulfillment in this life; they believe that voluntary euthanasia is morally correct, whilst upholding the need for safeguards to preven... [tags: Free Euthanasia Essay]
647 words (1.8 pages)
- The matter of euthanasia continues to be a contentious issue within today’s society. Over the past years, there have been a slew of debates that have tried to justify the practice of assisted suicide, otherwise known as euthanasia. Gallup’s survey in 2007 served to illustrate this fact by showing that over 75 percent of Americans believe that euthanasia should be permitted. However, what Americans have failed to discern is that legalizing any form of euthanasia goes against the sanctity of life and will result in no limitations to the justifications of why it is being performed.... [tags: Against Euthanasia ]
1829 words (5.2 pages)
- Euthanasia Ends Suffering Death is deeply personal, generally feared, and wholly inescapable, but medical technology now can prolong our biological existence virtually indefinitely, and, with these advances, comes the question of whether we should pursue the extension of life in all cases. Most people would agree that, under certain circumstances, it would be preferable to cease our hold on life. Nearly everyone can agree that there are situations when terminally ill patients have the right to call for a halt to life-extending treatments, and that their physicians will have the moral obligation to comply. What appears to be quite difficult for us as a society to come to t... [tags: Euthanasia Physician Assisted Suicide]
2652 words (7.6 pages)