The Absurdity Of $ 15 Minimum Wage Summary

1347 Words3 Pages

A Marxist Take on Tim Worstall’s “The Absurdity of a $15 Minimum Wage” One of the most prominent topics in current economics is whether the minimum wage should rise or remain the same as it has for over six years. Many middle and lower class Americans believe that a minimum wage of $7.25 is unethical because it is not a livable minimum wage; a standard workweek of forty hours at a wage of $7.25 per hour is not enough to pay the rent for most citizens of the United States. In 2013, there was a push to raise the minimum wage to $10.10, which was backed by even President Barack Obama, but such efforts to raise the wage were not enough. Within the past two years, the interest in raising the minimum wage to a “livable wage” has only grown. Tim …show more content…

If Worstall were correct in his analysis of the effects of a minimum wage increase, this would only prove to Karl Marx how ineffective capitalism is as an economic system. If Worstall is correct, we are left with a lose-lose situation with two options; the minimum wage can remain the same, causing many workers to struggle to survive, or if the wage is increased, many of those employed will lose their jobs due to capitalists’ willingness to only pay the bare minimum that they must for their workers. In Karl Marx’s “Wages of Labour”, he states “the lowest and only necessary wage rate is that providing for the subsistence of the worker for the duration of his work and as much more as is necessary for him to support a family and for the race of labourers not to die out.” In this statement Marx is shedding light on the fact that the capitalist is only going to pay their workers as much as it takes to live and make it back for the next workday. One could argue that in keeping the minimum wage at such an unlivable rate, present day capitalists aren’t even upholding the standard of “providing for the subsistence of the worker for the duration of his work” and in doing so are harming their workers, even when they’re employed. Thus, Marx would claim that if Worstall’s …show more content…

If increasing the minimum wage were to have a positive effect on the economy and the workers, it would only prolong the economic system of capitalism, further delaying Marx’s end goal of a communist economy. “The ordinary wage…is the lowest compatible with common humanity, that is, with a cattle-like existence,” Marx claims within Wages of Labour. He then continues, “the raising of wages gives rise to overwork among the workers. The more they wish to earn, the more they must sacrifice their time and carry out slave-labour, completely losing all their freedom, in the service of greed.” (Marx “Wages…”). Many would argue that in giving workers more than double what they are currently earning at minimum wage, we are placing more money into the workers hands as well as taking money out of the hands of the capitalists, which could be seen as a win-win. What many don’t come to terms with is the fact that even when the minimum wage is doubled, it does not serve as a legitimate redistribution of wealth. “Marx places a classless society over a redistribution of wealth [in importance]” claims Nordenhaug. Thus, we can assume that even if the raise of the minimum wage could serve as a partial redistribution of wealth, Marx would claim that once again, the movement is not pushing far enough, and a legitimate revolution is still

Open Document