Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
ethical dilemma abortion religion
religion views on abortion all over the world map
medical ethics on abortion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: ethical dilemma abortion religion
Contraception: A means of stopping conception (pregnancy) taking place
by chemical or mechanical means.
There are a variety of viewpoints on contraception from the different
Christian churches. Most couples in modern society feel the need to
control the numbers of children that they have. The Roman Church
teaches that all artificial (chemical or barrier) are wrong as the
primary reason for sexual intercourse should be to have children.
However the RC church does not condemn natural family planning which
means that the woman is aware of the times when she is fertile and the
times that she is not. There is much controvosy over these views
especially in places where there is overpopulation. Many Roman
Catholics use birth control and settle their own consciences.
"It is right and proper for parents to regulate the number of children
that they have and the spaces between the children, but not be means
that which artificially make it impossible for sexual intercourse to
result in conception (pregnancy)." [Catholic Truth Society]
Most Anglican and other Protestant denominations accept birth control
as long as both partners agree to its use:
"The Anglican view of contraception is that a couple may practice
forms of contraception that are acceptable to both partners" [Church
of England priest]
Note: Since 'all' the churches teach that sex should only take place
inside marriage the question of contraception outside marriage does
not arise. However unwanted pregnancy is seen as undesirable.
Abortion: Stopping the development of a foetus by chemical or
mechanical means.
"Life must be protected with the utmost care from the ...
... middle of paper ...
...hen considering the issue is "Is
Abortion Murder?" as no Christian should contemplate murder (6th
commandment "You shall not kill"). Obviously a fully grown baby
emerging from the womb is alive in its own right but is the union of
sperm and ovum (the zygote) "alive" in a recognised sense ? The foetus
has a 'brain' and a circulatory system - is this enough? Should we
consider the moment that the foetus can survive outside the womb as
the moment it becomes alive? Then do we consider the use of medicine
to keep it alive? It is vital for Christians to be able to answer this
question for they must support one side of the argument. Either the
doctors who perform the operation are removing an unthinking,
unfeeling bundle of protoplasm from the mother's womb or they are
killing a human being capable of experiencing sensations.
The journal article “Acorns and Embryos” give us a few basic points of whether or not embryos are actual human beings. One analogy George and Lee argue in their article is of the argument Michael Sandel has made by stating how “every oak tree was once and acorn, it does not follow that acorns are oak trees, or that I should treat the loss of an acorn eaten by a squirrel in my front as the same kind of loss as the death of an oak tree felled by a storm…” Sandel maintains that, by analogy, embryos are different in kind from human beings. But this argument cannot survive scrutiny. George and Lee also makes great points in relations to embryos being human individuals at an early stage of their development, just as adolescents, toddlers, infants, and fetuses.
[T]he female body is a reservoir, a virgin patch of still, pooled water where the fetus comes to term. (Paglia p.27)
There are many who say that the preborn child is just a mass of tissue, a part of the woman's body. If this were the case, then no one would have any reason to o...
For as long as there has been recorded history, there have been recordings of the procedure now known as abortion. The Bible appears to be silent on the topic, which is of no support to Christian groups, especially Catholics, who believe that abortion is a mortal sin. In his book, “The Morality of Abortion: Legal and Historical Perspectives,” John T. Noonan (1970) states that “The Old Testament has nothing to say on abortion” (6). John Connery (1977) agrees with Noonan in his book “Abortion: The development of the Roman Catholic Perspective” where he writes, “If anyone expects to find an explicit condemnation of abortion in the New Testament, he will be disappointed. The silence of the New Testament regarding abortion surpasses even that of the Old Testament” (34). This is a difficult silence to understand when one considers the fact that abortions were widely practiced during the New Testament era in the Middle East. There were few recorded legal prohibitions against abortion in antiquity, and even fewer ancient laws protecting the practice (Gilbert 1).
that matters is that of the woman the rule "life for a life, burn for
In Huxley’s Brave New World, human life is conceived in a bottle; the embryo no longer grows in the mother’s womb, and therefore no bond is formed between the mother and the baby.
Christian Attitudes to Abortion For Christians there are many sources of authority; leaders of the church, religious teachers, and even their own conscience. The main source however is the Bible; it helps guide Christians, and affects their attitude towards everyday life. Abortion, the act of terminating the life of a foetus (unborn child) before it has had a chance to live, was legalised in England in 1967 (The Abortion Act), however many Christians are still undecided on whether the act is morally correct.
Christians' Response to Abortion Contraception: A means of stopping conception (pregnancy) taking place by chemical or mechanical means. Abortion: Stopping the development of a foetus by chemical or mechanical means. There are many viewpoints on contraception from the different Christian churches. Most couples in today’s times feel they have the need to control the amount of children they have.
The Web. The Web. 15 Apr. 2013. The. Waskey, Andrew J. -. “Moral Status of Embryos.”
foetus or an embryo, an infant or an adult, an old person, or one suffering from an incurable
In order for the pro-life argument to be valid, it must have both a true premise and true conclusion. It falls short of validity by assuming that a fetus up to 22 weeks old is a person, and has its own rights independent of its host, or what we often refer to as its mother. First we must recognize the subtle, yet extremely important distinction between a human being and a person. It is obvious that a fetus is a member of the human ...
With the ongoing debate and the advancement of technology in determining the viability of a fetus, abortion, the ending of a pregnancy by removing a fertilized egg, has become increasingly controversial. The morality of abortion has caused many to separate into opposite sides of the spectrum, pro-life and pro-choice. The arguments over abortion has stirred a continuous debate between a pro-choice stance such as that presented by the analogical reasoning of Thomson or Glover’s examination of social context and a pro-life position argued by a moral view of personhood by Noonan. The ethical arguments presented by the conflicting views in the abortion debate has caused others to taken into consideration a sociological account visible in Luker’s examinations of world views in order to discover underlying motivations.
Many people do not realize that at the moment of conception life begins, it is a medical fact, once conceived; the structure of life is beginning to take place (Medical Testimony). Whether it is a mammal, sea creature, or even insects, they all start life as humans do. Directly following conception, there is an unreplaceable genetic code made that is unique and made to thrive but is destroyed without ever getting the chance to reach full potential.
As people, one have a freedom and speech and the will to do whatever one feel is right. Although some choices come with consequences rather they are good or bad. People are still going to place their own opinion, judge, or even fight what a certain person is doing because they do not believe it is right. When you come across something as broad as abortion it really gets people thinking. Some people see it as killing human and religious things, and some peo-ple are looking at it as something they had to do. Rather it is because they were raped, not ready, or it was going to harm them to go through this pregnancy. At what age does a baby re-ceive human right?