Management should focus on building a workplace and culture of employment certainty and employee self worthiness to best felicitate a low stress, highly productive environment. Being a servant manager, others takes precedence over self. A servant manager wishes to create a good working relationship with customers, employees and upper management to create a positive and edifying corporate experience for all involved. It is a managers responsibility to ensure profitability for the company and owners by producing a product quickly and inexpensively. Producing is not a managers only concern. The human element is the greatest asset to any company and maybe the greatest overlooked resource a company has at their disposal. The practice of-- just filling positions-- has to come to an end. In many modern companies, board rooms are including the Human Resource Managers in strategic and managerial decisions: “...the role of the traditional HR manager is diminishing....HR must now enter into the business of strategic HR, focus more on the bottom line of the organization, and leave the more administrative tasks to technology or others” (Mondy, 2010). Traditions are quickly fading as research discovers what traditionally worked in the past are not the best way of conducting business. HR needs to to take a more active role in shaping the company environment beyond the traditional role of hiring. The door of Human Resources needs to convey a symbol of strategic management and economic growth through HR development. HR in conjunction with management will development plans to acquire the best employees and manage the environment those employees work in to insure positive attitudes and productiveness.
Symbols are everywhere in work places and som...
... middle of paper ...
...
Higgins, George C. "Durable Goods: A Covenantal Ethic for Management and Employees. " Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 53.1 (Oct 1999): 165.
Shani, Rami, Chandler, Dawn, Coget, Jean-Francois, Lau, James, Behavior in Organizations: An Experiential Approach, 9th, San Luis Obispo: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2009. Print.
Mondy, R. Wayne, Human Resource Management, 11th, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2010. Print.
David, Fred R., Strategic Management: Concepts, 12th, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2009. Print.
Pride, William M., Ferrell, O.C., Marketing, 14th, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2008. Print.
Rock, David, “Managing with the Brain in Mind.” Strategy+Business Autumn 2009:58-67. Print.
Shaw, William H., Business Ethics, 7th, New York: New York, 2011. Print.
"New Association Vows to Fight Direct-Marketing Misdeeds. " Ward's Dealer Business. 41.2 (Feb 1, 2007)
Pride, W & Ferrell, O.C. 2000, Marketing Concepts and Strategies, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, p. 103.
Enron was the model for rapid growth in the 1990’s but part of the culture and ethics of Enron was disturbing. Falsified documents, cutthroat competitiveness among employees and accounting schemes that hid the truth of the company’s indebtedness were just a few examples of the lack of business ethics within the organization. Perhaps a more virtuous management team could have saved Enron from collapse.
After reading various essays and commentaries on servant leadership I thought about a criticism of the theory that wasn't addressed in the readings. Are servant leaders taken advantage of and in certain instances seen as pushovers rather than true leaders? If we review the basic concept of servant leadership, my definition would be a leader who does what’s necessary to ensure his followers are successful. Is this what you really want from a leader? In my opinion that answer is no, you want a leader to exhibit these “I will help you by all means” characteristics in certain situations, but not all of the time. If this is done all of the time I see this “leader” as a targeted pushover. The lesson commentary referenced the role of parenthood as an example of servant leadership. “Parents serve their children’s needs so that the children can develop into healthy adults…so that they can help their own children develop” (Lesson 11 Commentary, p. 2 Houston). For us parents out there, we know that this can be a slippery slope. If you always come to the rescue of the child, they will not learn ...
Servant leadership consists of leaders helping their followers become leaders themselves. The use personal skills such as empathy, compassion and listening to help their followers succeed. It is not necessarily the most popular form of leadership but, it has been proven successful b those leaders who implement it in their work practices. Servant leaders typically have a strong bond with their team. They are the base and the foundation of their teams.
Implementation of organizational growth falls to the responsibility of upper management and they develop the strategic plan for the company to flourish in the projected economic market. Oversight of this senior team can hinder the organizational projected strategy into a viable organizational process that today’s global market places high demands that make it very difficult to attain these goals or plans and bring all effort to no avail of achieving projected growth and strategy of the organization. Essential that key employees do not lack the skill to delegate responsibility as well as expect results that promote organizational growth and adherence to the strategy set by senior
Sub-topic 3: A Leader as a servant is countercultural to today’s society. The very definition of servant leader is the one who helps to build up people in an organization by being loving, motivating and positive.
Most cultures I find relate in many ways. They all display characteristics of servant leadership. I discovered that the Indian culture holds one to moral and ethics within the culture and religion. In a mirror image of Christians, Indians believe that your destiny is base off the seeds one sows while here on earth. The Indian culture does not recognize their beliefs and morals as servant leadership and have a different way of presenting the concept. One of the ways that one will find that servant leadership is presented different is in their religious practice of Hindu. Over all the Indian culture diverse context and religion
Whether an organization consists of five or 25,000 employees, human resources management is vital to the success of the organization. HR is important to all managers because it provides managers with the resources – the employees – necessary to produce the work for the managers and the organization. Beyond this role, HR is capable of becoming a strong strategic partner when it comes to “establishing the overall direction and objectives of key areas of human resource management in order to ensure that they not only are consistent with but also support the achievement of business goals.” (Massey, 1994, p. 27)
Changing Roles. Traditionally, HR has been an administrative position-processing paperwork, benefits, hiring and firing, and compensation. However, recently HRM has moved from a traditional to a strategic role, the emphasis is on catering to the needs of consumers and workers. Before, HR was seen as the enemy and employees believed that HR’s main purpose was to protect management. Now, the position requires HRM to be more people oriented and protect their human capitol, the staff. In addition, human resource management has to be business savvy and think of themselves as strategic partners in the 21st century.
HRM in any company is a weighty issue that needs much attention where business performance is linked to a HR strategy (Caldwell 2008; Ulrich et al. 2008). In the recent past, competition has become stiff, such that organizations need to come up with other means to compete in the extremely dynamic market world. Thus, companies have shifted their emphasis to Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) where they enhance and empower their personnel in order to increase the productivity and the services offered into the market (Mello 2006). This goes against the traditional ways of increasing the means of competition where organizations place emphasis on tangible resources. In the past, organizations competed in terms of machinery and acquisitions. This has changed greatly due to the changing customer tastes and the diversity of the market in the present (Delery & Doty 1996; Lengnick-Hall et al. 2009).
Organizations’ other resources can be hired, retained and discarded at any time but human resources needs special treatment. It needs to be carefully hired, deserve an extra effort to retain it and requires training & development to upgrade and improve its capabilities. Other resources depreciate with the passage of time but when the human resource gains more and more experience, it becomes more beneficial for the organizations. These characteristics have brought human resources to be the central element for the success of an organization. (Mohammed, Bhatti, Jariko, and Zehri, 2013, pg. 129, para. 2)
“Hr is shifting from focusing on the organisation of the business to focusing on the business of the organisation” (Zulmohd 2011). David Ulrich points out four distinctive roles of HR which makes the organisation most effective and produce competitive advantage. He planned to change the structure of HR function and build HR around roles. The four key HR roles identified by Ulrich, one HR business partner/strategic partner – aligning HR and business strategy which plays an important role in setting strategic direction. It builds strategic relationship with clients and strategically manages the development of the workforce. The second key role is administrative expert which creates and must deliver effective HR processes made to tailor business needs. It also involves managing people and HR related costs. To continue to the third key role, change agent which understands the organisations culture, and takes the responsibility to communicate those changes internally and gain its employees trust. The final key role identified by Ulrich is employee advocate which is a core in HR role represents employees and helps to improve their experience, protect employees’ interests and confirm strategic initiatives are well balanced. Employee advocates must also “ensure fair, ethical and equitable people processes and practices.” “David Ulrich’s HR Model is about defining the HR roles and
According to our textbook Human Resource Management (HRM) is the policies, practices, and systems that influence employees’ behavior, attitudes, and performance. “The human resources management process involves planning for, attracting, developing, and retaining employees as the HRM planning provides the rights kinds of people, in the right quantity, with the right skills, at the right time (Lussier, 2012, p. 240).” According to our textbook the typical responsibilities of the Human Resources department fall into three categories, and they are administrative services and transaction, which handle hiring employees. The second involves business partner services that focus on attracting, evolving, retaining employees by having a clear understanding
Introduction A comprehensive Human Resource Management Strategy plays a vital role in the achievement of an organisation’s overall strategic objectives and visibly illustrates that the human resources function fully understands and supports the direction in which the organisation is moving. A comprehensive HRM Strategy will also support other specific strategic objectives undertaken by the marketing, financial, operational and technology departments. In essence, an HRM strategy’s aim should be to capture the ‘people’ part of an organisation and its medium to long-term projection of what it wants to achieve, ensuring that. It employs the right people, those have the right mix of skills, employees show the correct behaviours and attitudes, and employees have the opportunity to be developed the right way.
Servant Leadership means to serve others and to lead. It puts everyone else first teaching to put others before yourself, with this leading qualities emerge. Just being or having leadership qualities doesn’t always work. Most leadership models show possessive towards the better for themselves, some work out while others don’t, mostly I think because the unwillingness to see others before yourself is a hard concept for some to understand and use. You can be a great leader but if you don’t understand servant qualities or serve for the benefit of others your probley not much liked. Most I don’t think know what Servant Leadership is or means, I didn’t until this course opened it up to me.