Who Is Our Speaker? Who Is This 'We'?

1053 Words3 Pages

The short story by William Faulkner, “A Rose for Emily”, is a short tale about a woman named Emily and what is known of her. The question I pose to answer is: Who is our speaker? Who is this “we”? What is the purpose of this “we”? The “we” refers to the townspeople with no apparent ties to Emily’s story. More importantly, the “we” refers to an individual aiming to make this claim. The story’s speaker is but one individual making a claim for some sort of union of individuals. From this stance, it becomes most apparent with what the word “we” entails, and what this “we” does to the point of view. Whichever way you go about it, undeniably there is always an “I” within the “we”. In order to even begin to know who our “we” is, we would need to …show more content…

“When Miss Emily died, our whole town went to her funeral” (Page 516, The Norton Introduction to Literature). Notice that just in the same way that the “we” encloses an “I”, this works the same in the usage of “our”. How does this set up guilt in the story? It is literally phrased “our whole town” to add an emphasis on the state of possession over the area. The phrase wasn’t “her whole town” or “the whole town”. The phrase was “our whole town”. There is a sense of responsibility included in the usage of “our”. When you take possession of something you claim responsibility for it. Using this especially in the situation of a funeral sets up the grounds for the speaker’s guilt. This is important to note when aiming to find out the purpose behind the general usage of “we” in narrating the story. By using “we” as an approach to tell a story about death and implied murder, the individual “I” behind the “we” can relieve themselves from the sense of guilt that accompanies the tale. In order to defend one’s self in the case of a guilty situation, it’s not uncommon for people to claim they weren’t the only person involved in the incident. At least then if they were to be held accountable they wouldn’t be alone in their accountability. Approaching the narration this way shows that the “I” believes that the other townspeople involved feel similarly by speaking in a collective …show more content…

Having someone die in your own town, especially in such the way that Homer Barron is implied to have died, is similar in respect to having someone die in your own house. Your town and your house are both locations you might feel fit the entitlement of “home”. The ability to separate themselves with “we” gives the speaker a chance to escape the idea that they are largely a part of the story themselves. On frequent occasions the “we” is actually actively involved in their own tale. The most important instance of this is at the end of the story. “For a long time we just stood there, looking down at the profound and fleshless grin” (Page 522, The Norton Introduction to Literature). It is here that we notice just how actively involved in the story the “we” is. The “we” play the important role of both finding Homer Barron’s body and granting us conclusions to Homer Barron’s disappearance. However, the narrator’s usage of “we” actively works to separate themselves from playing a big role in the story. This ties back to the concept of guilt. If the narrator can feel separation from the story itself, then the narrator can feel minimal pangs of guilt in response to their own lack of involvement that resulted in this kind of

Open Document