Essay PreviewMore ↓
"Our calling is not to blaze a trail, for Christ has done that for us. Rather, our task is to join the many who have walked and are walking the path, to follow the footprints leading to eternity and to God."
In Donald Fairbairn's "Eastern Orthodoxy Through Western Eyes", Fairbairn takes the basic beliefs of Orthodoxy and explains them from a Western point of view. It's evident that this book was written for those of the Protestant faith due to the language used and the issues they address. Although he describes the theology correctly, his interpretation of what the theology means and what it means to Orthodox Christians is inaccurate and almost offensive.
Fairbairn decided to break the book into three parts so that he could properly explain Orthodoxy with a Western perspective. In the first part, Fairbairn explains where the source of the Orthodox Vision comes from. He claims that the source is Tradition. He talks about the tradition of the church and how we express said tradition. In the second part of the book he talks about the heart of the Orthodox Vision, which he asserts is the Union with God. He delves into basic theology and explains salvation and humanity in a way that "Westerners" can understand. I think he accurately reports on the basic Orthodox Theology and he writes in such a way that those who are uneducated on this matter can easily comprehend. The third section of this book, which is titled "The Orthodox Vision and Its Distortions", Fairbairn talks about "Popular Orthodoxy" and actions and views that Orthodox faithful do that are incorrect (i.e. the emphasis on the Saints etc.). In my opinion Fairbairn takes this opportunity to criticize Orthodoxy and point out some major faults that the Orthodox faithful have. He states that the church is "Triumphalistic" and does not have any tolerance for other faiths and their churches . I plan on expanding on part three later on in this review and more particularly popular Orthodoxy. Even though the book was dry and at times boring, Fairbairn's assessment of Orthodoxy is fairly accurate in parts one and two.
By reading this book, it's clear that the author, Donald Fairbairn is very educated on the facts, and history of Orthodoxy and its Theology.
How to Cite this Page
"A Review of Donald Fairbairn's Eastern Orthodoxy Through Western Eyes." 123HelpMe.com. 19 May 2019
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Donald the Demagogue: Donald J. Trump, is known to many as the orange man who wags his finger down a long table of celebrities firing them left and right every Sunday night on NBC. To others he is known as the billionaire tycoon, who graces our headlines for remarkably insensitive or oddball remarks. All (not even possibly Mr. Trump himself), at least until now, viewed him as a possible candidate for the next President of the United States. But as polls indicate, and citizens across the country (both moderate and conservative) vote in favor of Trump, he may very well be sitting in the oval office come January 20th, 2017.... [tags: Donald Trump, Ivana Trump, Fred Trump]
1297 words (3.7 pages)
- When it comes to the final presidential debate the finalist are a different type of people than the rest of this world. On the 26th of September 2016 at Hofstra University the first presidential debate was taken place and the moderator was Lester Holt. The two candidates were Hillary Clinton and Donald J. Trump. The debate was ninety minutes long and was distributed into six different sections which were each fifteen-minute-long and each candidate has two minutes to answers the question and then there will be a discussion.... [tags: Question, Answer, Donald Trump]
851 words (2.4 pages)
- Donald Trump’s hypocritical claim to be a Christian is conspicuous as he holds up Grandma’s bible and mispronounces 2 Corinthians, etc., as if to make a joke of the whole thing. When 60 minutes first interviewed with Donald Trump and his new running mate, Mike Pence, interviewer Leslie Stahl contrasted the difference between the two, saying Trump was brash and Pence was quiet and religious. Trump butted in, “Oh, I’m religious.” The proof he offered. “Well, I won the evangelicals.” Trump said. Donald’s antichristian character is mockery of God.... [tags: Jesus, Islam, Donald Trump, God]
1123 words (3.2 pages)
- Research Paper "Everything is uglier up close." Donald Trump is the front runner of the 2016 race for the Republican Nomination. Placing no consideration on the views of the ring wing conservatives, but rather just making a decision based off of how Donald Trump conducts himself, both in the present and past, Donald would not make America great again. Many situations and people look well off from a distance, yet most of the time the prettiest faces hide the worst secrets, the person who speaks the loudest is the most desperate to be heard, and someone who says they tell the truth are the most likely to lie.... [tags: Democracy, United States, Donald Trump, Voting]
2721 words (7.8 pages)
- As media has grown it has allowed for easier use for the average individual. This paper will examine how Donald Trump has used the media available today and how effective he has been. To begin, Trump’s background must be looked at to gain an understanding of how he came to the place he is today. According to the Washington Post, he was born in Queens New York into a wealthy family and when he was a teenager he was sent off to military school by his father (Miller & Schwartzman). He grew up with a cushy lifestyle before his father decided that his behavior required somewhat of a “reality check” for the teen.... [tags: Twitter, Social media, Sociology, Donald Trump]
903 words (2.6 pages)
- Why Donald Trump Will Win the 2016 Election The 2016 election cycle has been one for the history books. For the Democrats, we have Hillary Clinton, the first female Democratic nominee and proclaimed liar and murderer. The right has indicted her in the death of those involved in Benghazi, and they have continued to slam her for her private email server and deletion of thirty thousand emails. On the right, we have business mogul Donald Trump. He is a self-proclaimed womanizer, and he is ready to build a wall, and make Mexico pay for it.... [tags: Donald Trump, Ivana Trump, Fred Trump]
935 words (2.7 pages)
- 2016 Presidential candidates Donald Trump and Hilary Clinton have exuberantly managed to provide us with perhaps the most unorthodox mockery of a presidential election ever seen in modern day history. Why. Because this was an election based virtually on circumstance. And the winner is…Donald Trump. The Curious Case of Donald J. Trump Could the unfit be a good fit. Well let’s lay out the options. I will give you both scenarios. Now it is no secret that Hilary Clinton won the popular vote by a longshot.... [tags: Donald Trump, Ivana Trump, Fred Trump]
808 words (2.3 pages)
- In Donald Barthelme’s novel Snow White, the main character Snow White contradicts the traits of a stereotypical 1960’s housewife. These traits, given to her by the author, differ from a typical 1960s housewife in appearance, demeanor, and priorities. The purpose of Barthelme’s presentation of Snow White in this manner is to expose the limitations of society’s gender roles rampant in the 1960s. In Barthelme’s novel Snow White, the protagonist, Snow White, is a 22 year old woman living with seven men.... [tags: Donald Barthelme]
975 words (2.8 pages)
- Bloxham's book ‘The final solution: A genocide’ has brought about much criticism and debate. In this book Bloxham “seeks to situate the mass-murder of European Jewry between 1941 and 1945 within the broader history of European genocide from 1875 to 1945” . In this, he challenges the uniqueness of the holocaust, and presents the argument that the full meaning of the holocaust and final solution can only be completely understood, if it is placed in the larger context of genocide. Bloxham argues that “the history of the holocaust is itself an international history, and international history always has comparative dimensions” .... [tags: book analysis/review]
1942 words (5.5 pages)
- Page 1 Donald Trump is a man of great wealth, as well as power and influence. There is no question that Trump worked hard to get where he is today. He is most defiantly a man of business. Even at the beginning of his life he was destined to show brilliance due to his father’s work. These events of course, would eventually lead to his extraordinary empire and his chance to run as President of the United States.... [tags: Donald Trump, Ivana Trump, Donald Trump, Jr.]
1187 words (3.4 pages)
Fairbairn's presentation of Orthodoxy was both fair and unfair and accurate and inaccurate on many different levels. Like stated before, part one and part two (with the exception of Chapter seven on the Saints) of "Eastern Orthodoxy " are informative and accurate but when it comes to chapter seven and part three, Fairbairn interprets Orthodox theology and his interpretation is faulty. Fairbairn does a wonderful job capturing the Orthodox Church's' tradition and nicely compares it to the Protestant and Roman Catholic understanding of church and community,
" [Protestants] view the church as a community of people who have responded through the faith in Christ to what God has revealed in his Word Roman Catholic understanding focuses on the hierarchy In contrast, Eastern Orthodoxy sees the Church as a mystical entity that comprises God's direct activity."
Fairbairn uses great scriptural support and accurately describes the church as spiritual and theological at the same time. Where he misses the mark though, are his thoughts on the Saints, the use of icons in Orthodox daily worship and the use and presence of Holy Relics in worship services, and church buildings. According to Fairbairn, " veneration of the Saints is tantamount to blasphemy because it denies the uniqueness of Christ as the one mediator between God and humanity." Fairbairn could not be more wrong with this statement. If it wasn't for the respect and attention we give to the Saints we wouldn't be able to glorify God and get close to Him. This is one of Orthodoxy's most distinguishing and unique qualities, the veneration and recognition of Saints as intercessors. Fairbairn unfairly attacks the veneration and use of icons in chapter seven and claims that the Orthodox faithful worship images, thus violating the second commandment, "Eastern emphasis on icons is essentially idolatry." Fairbairn cites Ouspensky who delivers a nice defense for the Orthodox, "Icons are intermediaries between the represented person and the praying faithful, causing them to commune in grace." The use of icons in spiritual life is found only in the Orthodox church. No other religion can understand the use of these objects and no other religion will be able to until they actually experience it. It's understandable that the Protestants are uncomfortable with the use of icons but they need to realize (which, I know, is a very difficult thing to imagine) that for the Orthodox, veneration of the icons and Saints are an important and necessary aspect of our religion. Finally, Fairbairn puts his two cents in on Holy Relics. He makes it seem that Orthodox worship these Relics and look to them for special powers, " [the relics] came to be regarded as sacred objects having the effects of communicating their power to those who touched them." In reality we reaffirm our faith with the aid of the Holy Relics.
I don't believe Donald Fairbairn's criticisms are justified. It's clear that he doesn't understand the true mysteries of the church and it's a shame that he, in a way, ruins the things most special to Orthodoxy. Dr. Katos, a professor at Hellenic College, spoke about the Saints in his Introduction to Orthodoxy class and commented that, (and I paraphrase) "the Orthodox church finds these people [the Saints] so important that they commemorate certain ones in every service (i.e. the Theotokos, St. John the Baptist, Sts. Joachim and Anna etc.) and the Saint of the day in the service done that day " The Saints are so important because they defended the word of God and message of Christ, they died by the blade for the Lord, they wrote countless works to make understanding Gods message easier for future Christians, that without these men and women, Orthodoxy would not be the upstanding and glorious religion that it is today. There are no Saints in the Protestant church, they don't understand the difference between worship and veneration, and obviously Fairbairn doesn't see the difference.
I think Fairbairn views the Orthodox Church as Triumphalistic and dangerous to other religions. He asserts, " being a member of the Orthodox Church is more significant than having a genuine desire to follow Christ." I was personally bewildered by that statement. Fairbairn supports this statement by mentioning Russian Orthodox propaganda against Protestantism and then offers a little bit of advice to the Orthodox Church,
"Orthodoxy needs to care more for the spiritual state of the people of Russia, Greece, Romania and others, than for the simple maintenance of its own supremacy to other confessions in those regions Perhaps Orthodoxy needs to be less Triumphalistic and more willing to value the contributions that other Christian confessions can make to the spiritual life of its people."
Comparing "Eastern Orthodoxy " with His Grace, Kallistos Ware's book, "The Orthodox Way" Orthodoxy is explained more comprehensively and even though complex at times, serves a better explanation to theological questions then Fairbairn's book. When it comes to just pure facts, Bishop Ware's book, "The Orthodox Church" streamlines Orthodox Christian theology and puts it into one comprehensive and easy to understand book that's appropriate for "cradle" Orthodox, Protestants or Roman Catholics. I'm able to understand and appreciate the tone of Bishop Ware's book. Where in Fairbairn's book, the attitude is almost criticizing and condescending, Bishop Ware speaks with enlightenment and education. I appreciate the tone in Bishop Ware's work and prefer it to Fairbairn.
It is my hope that Orthodox people, anyone thinking of converting to the church or anyone interested in the church exercise extreme caution before they read this book. They need to understand that this book is taken from the Protestant perspective and is an observation of the Orthodox Faith. Donald Fairbairn's depiction of Eastern Orthodoxy in "Eastern Orthodoxy Through Western Eyes" is a disappointment. Even though his theological facts are mostly correct, his interpretation of what the theology means and its significance to the Orthodox Faithful is imprecise and in the wrong.