Essay PreviewMore ↓
The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution is the most essential Amendment of all for employees working in the criminal justice field. This Amendment sets the foundation for the criminal justice system and implements mandatory guidelines for governmental employees. When the Constitution was originally created, its sole intent was to place limitations and restrictions on the federal government. The Constitution, as a living document has changed over the years and has continually been interpreted to keep up with America’s ever growing diversity and use of technology.
The Fourth Amendment Complete in Itself
The Fourth Amendment like most everything else in the Constitution has grown through case law. These cases set forth new ruling and implement new boundaries for professionals in the courts, criminal justice fields and any person operating under the authority of or in lieu of the United States government. "The Fourth Amendment requires that all search or arrest warrants be based on probable cause as stated by (Hess & Orthman," 2012 pp. 196). The Fourth Amendment works in the area of search and seizure of evidence but when an individual is seized for the purposes of an investigatory stop this too falls under the Fourth Amendments shadow ("Hess & Orthman," 2012).
Investigative stops, known as Terry Stops have been found to fall under the reach of the Fourth Amendment. Therefore, investigatory stops require reasonableness. What is reasonable has been considered as articulated facts that make an officer believe that someone has committed, is committing or is going to commit a crime. ("Florida Basic Recruit" 2010). When the government oversteps its boundaries there are numerous rules and doctrines in place to protect citizens from having their rights infringed upon; some differences in protection is offered to governmental employees who are acting within the scope of their duties. Examples of these are known as the Exclusionary Rule and the Good Faith Doctrine.
The Rule and Good Faith
The Exclusionary Rule forbids any evidence obtained illegally to be admissible in a court of law. The Supreme Court ruled in Burdeau v. McDowell that unconstitutional searches and seizures are to limit the federal government only. Before the days of Mapp v. Ohio evidence found at the state levels was usually not admissible in federal court and vice versa. Mapp v. Ohio allowed the states to adopt the Exclusionary Rule, making evidence interchangeable between state and federal levels. One could believe that with more areas being covered in this ruling now comes more possibility for liability.
How to Cite this Page
"A Living Amendment: The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution." 123HelpMe.com. 21 Aug 2018
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Mapp v. Ohio: Controversy of the Fourth Amendment Ms. Dollree Mapp and her daughter lived in Cleveland, Ohio. After receiving information that an individual wanted in connection with a recent bombing was hiding in Mapp's house, the Cleveland police knocked on her door and demanded entrance. Mapp called her attorney and subsequently refused to let the police in when they failed to produce a search warrant. After several hours of surveillance and the arrival of more officers, the police again sought entrance to the house.... [tags: essays research papers]
1291 words (3.7 pages)
- The Constitution has been operative since 1789 after the ratification of nine states (American Vision and Values, Page 52). Today many question the relevancy of a document 222 years old to our society. The Founders created a governmental framework, defining three branches and giving powers to the government and others to the states. It also guarantees the rights of the people. It took two and one-half years for the 13 colonies to ratify the Constitution. This ratification period was one of great debate and produced a series of essays complied into The Federalist.... [tags: USA, the Founders]
878 words (2.5 pages)
- The Second Amendment And The Right To Bear Arms Throughout the years there has been an ongoing debate over the Second Amendment and how it should be interpreted. The issue that is being debated is whether our government has the right to regulate guns. The answer of who has which rights lies within how one interprets the Second Amendment. With this being the case, one must also think about what circumstances the Framers were under when this Amendment was written. There are two major sides to this debate, one being the collective side, which feels that the right was given for collective purposes only.... [tags: Gun Bear Arms Control Essays Debate]
2184 words (6.2 pages)
- Introduction The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was drafted by the Framers to protect the right to be free from governmental intrusion. Without a warrant and probable cause, an officer may not enter a home and search it. The use of GPS technology, however, enables the government to collect the same information without ever leaving the office. Thus, GPS based surveillance presents the issue of what protection the Fourth Amendment offers. Current Fourth Amendment jurisprudence offers little protection from warrantless surveillance.... [tags: Fourth Amendment, Rights, United States]
1599 words (4.6 pages)
- “Don't interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties.” Abraham Lincoln made this statement in referring to the emancipation of the slaves. Even though the statement has nothing to deal with the Fourth Amendment, or the Search and Seizure laws within the Constitution, what is stated still brings about a good point relating to the Constitution. The fact being brought out of this quote is that the Constitution’s purpose is to safeguard Americans’ liberties.... [tags: Fourth Amendment, Abraham Lincoln, presidents, con]
1363 words (3.9 pages)
- The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution states that individuals have the right "to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and impacts, against outlandish looks and seizures," however the issue close by here is if this additionally applies to the pursuits of open fields and of articles in plain view and if the fourth correction gives insurance over these too. To reaffirm the courts' choice on this matter I will be identifying their choices in the instances of Oliver v. United States (1984), and California v.... [tags: California v. Greenwood]
855 words (2.4 pages)
- The most difficult problem that arises for the courts because of technology is the codification of the Fourth Amendment to apply to technological change and progress. The vast changes technology brings to surveillance, security, and data collection offer a challenge to courts in classifying these new technologies and monitoring their use within the limits of the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment states that people have the right to be “secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.” An influential dissent written by Louis Brandeis contends that the amendment does not simply protect a person’s property but the “right to be let alone.”... [tags: technologicals change, privacy, amendment]
1212 words (3.5 pages)
- “The founders who crafted our Constitution and Bill of Rights were careful to draft a constitution of limited powers- one that would protect Americans’ liberties at all times”. Al Franken was a strong believer in a powerful government that at the same time protects the citizens natural rights. However, some citizens have decided to test the law, thus creating a variety of new precedents. The Constitution is a body of work that sets precedents and establishes the powers and duties of a government; it also created a Supreme Court that establishes and enforces the law.... [tags: Constitution of the United States]
3137 words (9 pages)
- According to the Fourth Amendment, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.” Without the Fourth Amendment, people would have no rights over their own personal privacy. Police officers could just enter people’s houses and take anything that they could use as evidence and use it against them. With the advancement in today’s technology, it is getting more and more difficult to define what exactly privacy is to us, and whether or not the Fourth Amendment protects it.... [tags: you cannot search my home without a warrant]
684 words (2 pages)
- The Second Amendment “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This timeless phrase, the Second Amendment of the United States’ Constitution, is an enduring example of the principles and ideals that our country was founded on. With this statement, the founders of this country explicitly and perpetually guaranteed the American individual the right to keep and bear arms. An incomparably crucial element of this country‘s origins, the Second Amendment and the rights it guarantees have proved vital to the growth and success of our nation.... [tags: 2nd Amendment Constitution The Right To Bear Arms]
503 words (1.4 pages)
The Fourth Amendment is paramount to the criminal justice system and citizens alike. Through the years the Fourth Amendment has grown with Americas expansion of technology and diversity. The Fourth Amendment secures citizens daily lives against illegal search and seizure while setting the foundation and guidelines of which government agents and law enforcement alike can act on. The Exclusionary Rule deters governmental employees from violating an individuals Fourth Amendment rights but the Good Faith Exception secures government agents who are acting within the scope of their duties from civil and criminal liability.
Harr, J., Hess. & Orthmann, C. (2012). Constitutional law and the criminal justice system. (pp. 196,234 ). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.
(2011). Florida basic recruit : Training program law enforcement. (Vol. 1, pp. 38-39). Acton, Massachusetts: Copley Custom Textbooks.
(2010). Florida criminal justice sourcebook : includes cases, elements, defenses, and legal guidelines. (pp. LG-40 ). Charlottesville, Va: LexisNexis.
Burdeau v. McDowell, 256 U.S. 465 (1921)
Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)