Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Matrix organizational structure introduction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Matrix organizational structure introduction
An organization design labeled the matrix structure is currently a popular, well-liked, contemporary structural design that attempts to maximize the strengths and minimize the weaknesses of both the functional and divisional structures (Gibson, Ivancevich, Donnelly & Konopaske, 2009). The matrix organization superimposes a lateral structure that concentrates on product or project coordination on a vertical functional structure (Cummings, 2009). In practical terms, the matrix design combines functional and product department bases (Gibson, et al., 2009). The matrix organization design was originally created in the aerospace industry where changing customer requirements and technological conditions forced managers to focus on lateral relationships between functions to develop a flexible system of resources and processes, and to accomplish project objectives (Cummings, 2009). Today organizations such as IBM, Hughes Aircraft, ITT, Prudential Insurance, TWR, Texas Instruments, and Caterpillar Tractor are just a few of the users of the matrix system (Gibson, et al., 2009). Though the precise meaning of the matrix organization differs in practice, it is usually seen as a balanced arrangement between functional and product organization, between departmentalization by function and by product. Matrix organizations accomplish this preferred balance by overlapping a horizontal structure of authority, control, and communication on the vertical structure. For example the matrix design appoints specialists from different functional departments to work, usually, on more than one project being directed by a project manager. The matrix structure is much different from the traditional structure in that it creates a dual chain of command. Employees ...
... middle of paper ...
...e people work together in the organization that makes the structure succeed or fail. This includes implementing the structure and strategy correctly- and often this is the part that is neglected (Global Integration, 2011).
.
References
Cummings, W. (2009). Organization development and change. (9th ed.). Mason, Oh.: South- Western Cengage Learning.
Gibson, J. I. (2009). Organizations, behavior, structure, process (13th ed.). International Edition. Singapore: McGraw Hill.
Global Integration. (2011). Matrix structure and organization. Retrieved from http://www.global-integration.com/what_we_do/matrix_organisation_structures.html.
Robbins, & Coulter. (2007). Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Spector, B. (2010). Implementing organizational change: Theory into practice (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Organizations are initially structured around tasks, and as the organization continues to grow, the structure within the organization takes on many characteristics. Not all structures are advantageous, especially if they are lacking in some areas. There is a relationship between structure and size of the organization that affect the centralization of the organization. At the highest levels, the personality of the chief executive may amend the organizations' structure. The structure within an organization helps define the roles and responsibilities among the members from each department and work group. The four general types of organization structure are functional, divisional, matrix, and project based. “Organizational structure is the skeleton of an organization” (Feigenbaum, 2013) and how these individuals relate to each another. Structure is a statement of the current affairs, not the ideas, intentions or improvement within an organization. When business leaders develop their initial plans for an organization, he or she looks at how to design a company and takes inventory of all the tasks, functions and goals of the business. The leader then develops groupings and ordering of job positions, departments, and human resources to effectively and efficiently perform these tasks. Technology, size, environment, strategy and goals affect an organizational structure and effects, whether they are categorized as mechanistic or organic.
Effective teams must be developed, not just formed. A group is not a team. Members of a group may sometimes work together, but members of a team always work together. The team need not all be in the same place to be working together. “With a group, the whole is often equal to or less than the sum of its parts; with a team, the whole is always greater” (Oakley, Brent, Felder and Elhajj, 2004). A team, as defined above, has certain characteristics that make it effective. Not all of these traits are present when a team is in the forming stage. Tea...
Lorsch, J. W. (1987), “Organisation Design: A Situational Perspective”, Academy of Management Review, January Issue, pp. 117 – 132.
Organizational structure is one of the three key organizational assets that could contribute to the effectiveness of operations of any organization (Zheng, Yan and Mclean 2009) It is joined together by different flows of information, decision processes, hierarchy of authority, specialization and working materials. (Enz 2009; Mintzberg 1980) Furthermore, it also determines the operating workflow, control of information, decision-making in the organization and the line authority (Mintzberg 1980). The facets of the organizational structure, the relationships that exist within it, and how the business processes (Bititci et al 2011) are controlled, determine the managerial style that should be utilized in addition to the strategies the organization could implement. Going further, a company’s organizational design and the parts that constitute it are seen as a contributing factor to superior performance, which ultimately provide an organization with competitive advantage over its competitors. (Enz 2009; Zheng, Yang, and Mclean 2009)
The Importance of Group Work in Today's Organizations. It could be argued that in order to be successful, modern organisations must actively develop strong and cohesive work groups. Why do you need to be a member? Is it true that there is no room for the individual in today’s organisation? The rapid progression and improvement in information and communication technology has led to modern organisations finding new ways to work.
The Barings’ case is a perfect example of the consequences that incongruence, or lack of alignment between strategy and the four organizational building blocks (critical tasks and work flows, formal organizational arrangements, people and culture) can have on a company’s performance.
The market-oriented structure groups workers according to the market they serve, such as product, project, client, or geographical area. Large companies that implement a market-oriented structure may have market-based divisions or create a conglomerate of separate subsidiaries (Judith R. Gordon, 2002). I believe that this structure is more adoptable by those multinational corporations which have to respond to diverse cultures and meet the unique needs of various countries. The teams have the same goal meeting the market demands.
Companies that have been successful in organizing hi performing teams have reaped the benefits of having appropriate team cohesiveness. However, contrary for companies that have tried and failed at the everchanging task of keeping the lines of communication open between employees and leaders to reach a final product. It is not wise for a leader to place emphasis on team member relationships alone, but more importantly on problem solving techniques and motivating each individual and the team as a whole. Organizations that have set out to improve the quality of the products and business structu...
...r, functional structure also has some disadvantages which can include difficulties to work along with the other department. The perception of competition is present in that kind of work structure because of the lack of comprehension of what the other department provide for the company.
Nike is made up as a matrix organizational structure, which consist of several specialists and some individuals report to at a minimum of two managers. In the company, the staff informs to a crew of managers who dispatches the development report to the manager of the department. Each product within the company includes of it is own section and has its own department who performs independently of the CEO. The managers and employees of Nike decide concerning design and manufacture while the department managers concentrate mainly on ethical issues. In addition, the managers are completely accountable for the employees. While operating a matrix structure, Nike makes choices and responds quicker than any other department. Unlike Nike, Microsoft uses a divisional structure because it offers various separations within the company that functions almost as their own separate entities. However, this does not mean that they do not collaborate on projects or cross reference with each other. The divisi...
...ctional manager which means they have divided loyalty and must keep balanced. Employees are shifted from team to team depending on where their talents are most needed at any given time. This makes the matrix structure organic rather than mechanistic in nature.
In modern days, organizational architecture plays a key role in order to allow companies to get success in the market. Organizational architecture, also known as organizational structure, defines as a structure that where the specific company whether works roles, decision making or responsibility are centralized, delegated or coordinated. The organizational structure also identify how the information from level to level within the company. IKEA is one of the international famous firms that designs and produces home furniture such as bed frames and desks. The company also is the leader in retailing furniture and has become the largest furniture retailer over the globe. Therefore the structure of a company is an important factor to achieve a rapidly growth. This paper aimed to describe the IKEA’s organizational architecture and provide analysis that whether any recommendations or changes have to make based on current information.
Throughout the article, the authors’ focus has been on changes in automotive organizations in terms of their hierarchy, individual responsibilities, inter-organizational communication and product strategies. The details of project management aspects novel to each phase have been presented with an extensive research and illustrations. Examples of leading car manufacturers such as Chrysler, Renault and Toyota help relate the authors’ theories with real world situations. It is interesting to note how the vertical corporate structure from the first phase was gradually complemented by a horizontal line of authority as organizations embraced project functions to cope with the ever-increasing number of products and their decreasing life cycles. A clear trend of differentiation of projects...
Business structure is a critical factor to determine a company 's success or failure. Generally, larger organization has a more complex organizational structure. In the case of H&M, they had adopted matrix structure, one of the traditional organizational structure, into their business. As shown in figure 1, range of functional groups is listed horizontally across the table and on the other is product/task with a manager taking control of each. The functional structure is divided
Organizations must operate within structures that allow them to perform at their best within their given environments. According to theorists T. Burns and G.M Stalker (1961), organizations require structures that will allow them to adapt and react to changes in the environment (Mechanistic vs Organic Structures, 2009). Toyota Company’s corporate structure is spelt out as one where the management team and employees conduct operations and make decisions through a system of checks and balances.