In one of her many thought-experiments, Thomson uses a story of people-seeds to argue that a woman has a right to an abortion after voluntary intercourse. She tells a story of flying people-seeds that can fly into people’s houses. It’s important to use fine mesh screens and to use people-seed repellent around the house to keep the people-seeds out. If one of those people-seeds got into your house, would you let it remain rooted in your carpet? Does it have a right to remain there? No, of course they do not. It would be nice of you to let it remain there, but it is certainly not necessary. The argument is extremely comparable to pregnancy following voluntary intercourse (mesh screens being equal to contraception, the house equal to the body, and the people-seeds equal to the fetus).
Toward the end of the paper, Thomson goes on to point out the difference between Minimally Decent Persons and Good Samaritans. Minimally Decent Persons are just that; minimally decent. They do what is required by them as members of society, but they do not go above and beyond, unlike Good Samaritans. Thomson argues that no one is required to be a Good Samaritan and that people must only be Minimally Decent Persons. In the above peo...
... middle of paper ...
...potential for many reasonably healthy years before their quality of life can be called extremely low. IT is the same for abortion. Abnormalities that prenatal testing can find vary wildly, and few fetuses, pregnancies, circumstances, and futures are alike. People need to make the decisions that are best for the fetus in question. Cases should be evaluated cautiously; just like the pregnant woman is responsible for making decisions for the fetus, those responsible for the care of these individuals need to carefully assess the situation before making a decision.
While the traditional story of the Good Samaritan is about saving a person’s life, depending on the situation, it can be about saving a person or fetus from a lifetime of agony and distress. To reiterate, each case is different and should be carefully appraised before drastic and permanent decisions are made.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Abortion is an exceedingly controversial political topic, and it has been hotly debated through the years. Because multiple parties - the mother and the fetus - stand to gain or lose dramatically from each abortion decision, there is much moral gray area; however, society could benefit from looking at the issue philosophically. After all, philosophers often debate moral responsibility. In her argument "A Defense of Abortion," Judith Jarvis Thomson concludes that abortion is morally acceptable in almost all cases.... [tags: Abortion, Pregnancy, Argument, Logic]
901 words (2.6 pages)
- In the Judith Jarvis Thomson’s paper, “A Defense of Abortion”, the author argues that even though the fetus has a right to life, there are morally permissible reasons to have an abortion. Of course there are impermissible reasons to have an abortion, but she points out her reasoning why an abortion would be morally permissible. She believes that a woman should have control of her body and what is inside of her body. A person and a fetus’ right to life have a strong role in whether an abortion would be okay.... [tags: Pregnancy, Abortion, Childbirth, Fetus]
1559 words (4.5 pages)
- The topic of abortion has been one of the most controversial in bioethics, revolving around the issue of whether a fetus has the right to life and when a fetus is considered a person. In Judith Jarvis Thomson’s article, “A Defense of Abortion”, she presents the belief that the fetus is granted with the right to life and is considered a person upon contraception. Throughout the article, Thomson attempts to argue that abortion is not always considered murder under specific cases. She uses analogical reasoning to explain her reasoning for abortion; in this case, she uses the metaphor of a sick violinist and relates it to a mother and fetus.... [tags: Pregnancy, Abortion, Fetus, Analogy]
956 words (2.7 pages)
- “A Defense of Abortion” is a philosophy paper by Judith Jarvis Thomson in which the author argues for abortion, using several analogies to illustrate her points. In a move that separates this paper from the bulk of others on the same topic, Thomson grants at the start of the paper that a fetus has the right to life. She then proceeds to argue that although a fetus has a right to life, that right does not trump a woman’s right to her body. She concludes that abortion is an acceptable choice in a variety of circumstances.... [tags: Abortion, Pregnancy, Samaritan]
1949 words (5.6 pages)
- 'A Defense of Abortion' by Judith Jarvis Thomson In the article 'A Defense of Abortion' Judith Jarvis Thomson argues that abortion is morally permissible even if the fetus is considered a person. In this paper I will give a fairly detailed description of Thomson main arguments for abortion. In particular I will take a close look at her famous 'violinist' argument. Following will be objections to the argumentative story focused on the reasoning that one person's right to life outweighs another person's right to autonomy.... [tags: Defense Abortion Articles Essays Thomason ]
1081 words (3.1 pages)
- Take-home Exam |Question 2| Judith Jarvis Thomson, a 20th century philosopher, offers her argument defending abortion in her paper, “A Defense of Abortion”. She states initially that the fetus has a right to life, although contrary to her argument, she uses it as a premise to develop her thoughts. In short, Thomson says that the fetus’s right to life does not outweigh the woman’s right to control her body. She forces readers to participate in a thought experiment as she gives an odd example about a violinist suffering from kidney failure.... [tags: Capital punishment, Murder, Paraphilia, Death row]
1468 words (4.2 pages)
- Is an egg chicken or an egg. How many of you had asked this question when you were little. I think a fetus works the same, so when it comes to morality of abortion, many saying ‘no’ and many saying ‘case by case’. In my paper, I will try to explain Aristotle’s response based on his ethics to the arguments advanced on abortion by Judith Jarvis Thomson and Don Marquis in their essays, “A Defense of Abortion” and “An Argument that Abortion Is Wrong,” respectively. In Thomson’s article, “A Defense of Abortion,” Thomson argues that abortion is not impermis-sible because she agrees with the fact that fetus has already become a human person well before birth, from the moment of conception (Thomson... [tags: Human, Ethics, Morality, Religion]
1032 words (2.9 pages)
- The right to life The article A Defense of Abortion written by Judith Thomson and the article Why Abortion is Immoral by Don Marquis deal with the arguments of whether abortion is moral, immoral, justified or not. The author Don Marquis wants to prove that abortion is immoral without taking into consideration extreme cases, while Thomson says that abortion is justified in some cases. The latter supports her arguments by saying that abortion is justified in cases such as rape and when the mother’s life, which is the most important here, is in danger.... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Abortion, Human]
1029 words (2.9 pages)
- Judith Thomson’s “A Defense of Abortion” is an essay where Thomson argues that abortion is not impermissible. To be even more precise, she argues for abortion should also be sometimes permissible, but she also grants that there are certain situations in which getting an abortion would be immoral. “Most opposition to abortion relies on the premise that the fetus is a human being, a person, from the moment of conception.” (Thomson, 48). She uses the rhetorical triangle to help her achieve her argument about abortion.... [tags: Abortion, Abortion debate, Pregnancy, Human]
1163 words (3.3 pages)
- People term to accept and reject moral and ethical decisions according to the agreement with the majority of the society. However, there are many debating cases that cannot decide whether those are morally wrong or not because it is hard to draw a clear line of immorality and morality between those cases. Abortion is one of debating cases among them where some people argues that it is impermissible to do abortion and some believe that it is not ethically wrong to do abortion. In some states of United States, abortion is permissible, but it is not in some states.... [tags: victim, fetus, pregnancy]
960 words (2.7 pages)