Analysis Of Diminishing Authenticity In A Technologically Advanced Society

1566 Words4 Pages

Diminishing Authenticity in a Technologically Advanced Society As time has progressed, there have been various evolutions that have changed the common perspectives of the human mind. One of the most important evolutions happens to be an undocumented evolution that predates to the beginning of human group activity. This evolution happens to be the evolution of communication. The evolution of communication is the most important factor in transitioning the simple human society into a complex human society. In modern time, as individuals have reached a complex society, they have also become unique as individuals, but they still possess similar characteristics that can group them in common categories. In this essay, I will perform a cultural theoretical …show more content…

I conclude with the thought that this epidemic will continue because we can 't escape the world of mass media. To scientifically support this analysis, I evaluated the answers to multiple questions that were asked to the Texas A&M Memorial Student Center 's shipping and receiving staff related to technological communication through social networks. In addition, I developed three theoretical explanations that can explain how technology is assisting the diminishment of authenticity as follows: the Diminishing Authenticity Theory, the Technological Advancement Theory, and the Technological Communication Theory. First, the Diminishing Authenticity theory claims that authenticity diminishes as we produce and consume culture from the culture industry through various technology sources because the culture industry limits freedom of choice and creates social norms. …show more content…

Similar to Weber’s types in the social action theory, Riesman developed categories based on his belief that the directedness types depended on the conformities that society enforces on individuals (Riesman 1961). In addition, Riesman also believed that the directedness types depended on how society molds social character. Riesman states that the society of high growth potential that conforms to the tendencies of traditions can be referred to as the traditional directedness type (Riesman 1961). Riesman believed that the traditional directedness type of individuals were driven to conform due to their fear of being shamed (Riesman 1961). Additionally, Riesman states that the society of transitional growth produces members who conform to internalized goals that are set in early life, can be referred to as inner directed (Riesman 1961). Riesman believed that the inner directedness type conformed due to their fear of being guilty (Riesman 1961). Last, Riesman states that the society of incipient population decline conform to the expectations of others, can be referred to as the other directedness type (Riesman 1961). Riesman believed that the other directedness type of individuals were driven to conformity by

Open Document