and the authority such as city council to overcome differences and obstacles, so it can be beneficial to different communities.
2.3 A comprehensive analysis of Managed care and community development agencies Managed care model has the objective of reshaping the delivery of health care from individual or community to a whole system of care. The focus here is more on access and cost. Managed care is known as a comprehensive model, but has a completely different health care approach. This model lines more on allopathic care. It is evident that managed care model, allopathic medicine is exclusively the focus. Consequently, doctors often lack the in-depth understanding of the holistic part. Managed care ignores the horizontal integration, which
…show more content…
The outreach franchise and polyclinic model bring everyone including the patient together through their teamwork approach in medical practice. Whereas extended general practice and Managed care approach are different. Extended model brings private general practitioners and other healthcare professionals such as nurses together under the umbrella of PBC to provide a wide array of competence, expertise, and skills for a comprehensive care in hospitals, and community based settings. Conversely, Managed care’s objective is to reshape the delivery of health care from individual or community to a whole system of care. The outreach model has the advantage since providers work together to deliver coordinated care from primary, secondary to tertiary care, but authors believe that having a disease- focused model will overshadow the cause and this may not attain the main focus of Alma Ata …show more content…
This model is used in many developed countries, but people believe that the cost is not improving. MCO focuses on allopathic medicine, the access and cost of health care services. However, it hasn’t convinced people in its overall efficiency. Managed care ignores horizontal integration which I believe could be an efficient community tool on prevention and wellness. But, extended general practice model would provide a comprehensive high level of care; this is a value base model extended from hospital to residential team-building workshops but the other two are not. Their organizational commitment to expand and educate the primary care team in multidimensional plan of health including primary care and research could reform the system for providing efficient care
Woods J.K. (2001) The development of integrated health care models in Scotland. International Journal of Integrated Care. 1(1): 1-10
I agree with Heath’s argument that a two-tier health care system is effective as long as it does not undermine the integrity of the public insurance mechanism. The main argument against the two-tier health care system is that doctors will turn away from the public sector to pursue a higher income within a private practice. The concern arises that this will cause a scarcity of doctors within the public sector. I believe this argument is invalid and will discuss throughout this paper why the two-tier system improves upon health care systems in many ways.
When one examines managed health care and the hospitals that provide the care, a degree of variation is found in the treatment and care of their patients. This variation can be between hospitals or even between physicians within a health care network. For managed care companies the variation may be beneficial. This may provide them with opportunities to save money when it comes to paying for their policy holder’s care, however this large variation may also be detrimental to the insurance company. This would fall into the category of management of utilization, if hospitals and managed care organizations can control treatment utilization, they can control premium costs for both themselves and their customers (Rodwin 1996). If health care organizations can implement prevention as a way to warrant good health with their consumers, insurance companies can also illuminate unnecessary health care. These are just a few examples of how the health care industry can help benefit their patients, but that does not mean every issue involving physician over utilization or quality of care is erased because there is a management mechanism set in place.
The regionalized model organizes levels of care into primary care, secondary care, and tertiary care (Bodenheimer & Grumbach, 2012). Primary care would be general practitioners, who make up the majority of physicians in Great Britain, secondary care would be physicians specializing in areas like internal medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology and general surgeries (Bodenheimer & Grumbach, 2012). Tertiary care specialists include cardiac surgeons, immunologists, and pediatric hematologists, and they work at a few highly specialized medical centers (Bodenheimer & Grumbach, 2012). Hospitals are also organized in a similar fashion, with district hospitals serving local communities, and regional tertiary care medical centers providing highly specialized care services (Bodenheimer & Grumbach, 2012). While some think that dispersed model of care provides flexibility and convenience, others find the regionalized model of care to be more organized and less expensive (Bodenheimer & Grumbach, 2012). I have to agree with the supporters of the regionalized model of care because I would rather have a few different doctors look at me and decide on the best course of action than go straight to the cardiac surgeon. Care should be planned for a patient in a way that the patient only receives services that he or she requires, and organizing our health care delivery model in a different way can help us attain cost containment and ensure that the patient does not get unnecessary
Twenty-first century health care system in United States is not only complex, but also profoundly different from "what it used to be." The changes are numerous and represent the major shifts involved in moving from protection and delivery plan, based primarily on what the patient wanted, to a skeptically managed healthcare system. The American health care system has seen drastic changes within couple generations and it continues to evolve.
Managed care dominates health care in the United States. It is any health care delivery system that combines the functions of health insurance and the actual delivery of care, where costs and utilization of services are controlled by methods such as gatekeeping, case management, and utilization review. Different types of managed care plans came into development by three major factors. These factors include choice of providers, different ways of arranging the delivery of services, and payment and risk sharing. Types of managed care organizations include Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) which consist of five common models that differ according to how the HMO is related to the participating physicians, Preferred Provider Organizations (PPOs), Exclusive Provider Organizations (EPO), and Point of Service Plans (POS). `The information management system in a managed care organization is determined by the structure of the organization' (Peden,1998, p.90). The goal of a managed care system is to provide subscribers and dependants with needed health care services at the lowest possible cost. Certain managed care plans also focus on prevention by trying to keep members healthy.
It is no secret that the current healthcare reformation is a contentious matter that promises to transform the way Americans view an already complex healthcare system. The newly insured population is expected to increase by an estimated 32 million while facing an expected shortage of up to 44,000 primary care physicians within the next 12 years (Doherty, 2010). Amidst these already overwhelming challenges, healthcare systems are becoming increasingly scrutinized to identify a way to improve cost containment and patient access (Curits & Netten, 2007). “Growing awareness of the importance of health promotion and disease prevention, the increased complexity of community-based care, and the need to use scarce human healthcare resources, especially family physicians, far more efficiently and effectively, have resulted in increased emphasis on primary healthcare renewal…” (Bailey, Jones & Way, 2006, p. 381). The key to a successful healthcare reformation is interdisciplinary collaboration between Family Nurse Practitioners (FNPs) and physicians. The purpose of this paper is to review the established role of the FNP, appreciate the anticipated paradigm shift in healthcare between FNPs and primary care physicians, and recognize the potential associated benefits and complications that may ensue.
...e crucial change needed in health services delivery, with the aim of transforming the current deteriorated system into a true “health care” system. (ANA, 2010)
The rapid growth of managed care is the response to limited financial resources and the demand for healthcare services to be affordable. Economic viability is a crucial aspect of health care. Managed care plans were developed to provided health care services, but also to be a method to collect payment for services. There are different types of managed care plans. For example, health maintenance organization (HMO), preferred provider organization (PPO), and point-of-service (POS) plans. For brevity of this paper the HMO managed care system will be discussed along with the relevance of the role of the advance practitioner practicing in HMO setting.
The health care system in the United States is one of the most complex forms of healthcare system. What makes the system complex is that there are multiple factors involved. For example, there are multiple players and payers involved in the system. This includes physicians, administrator of health services institutions, insurance companies, large employers and lastly the Government Shi & Singh, 2012). Each of these players and payers are involved to protect their own economic interest. Hospitals for instances, wants to maximize reimbursement from both private and public insurers. Insurance companies and managed care organizations are concerned with how they can maintain their share of the health care insurance market, while physicians seek to maximize their income and have minimal interference with the way they practice medicine (Shi & Singh, 2012). It is obvious that there is no centrality of the health care system. In other words, there is no one department or in particular government body that is unilaterally in charge of the administration of the health care system as it is in the other developed nations where they have a single payer system, which is the government. Instead, the U. S. has health system that is financed by private sectors. According to Shi and Singh,(2012), 54% of total health care expenditures is privately financed through employers , while the remaining 46% is financed by the government. Lack of centrality in monitoring the total expenditures through global budgets or control over the availability and utilization of services coupled with most hospitals and clinics now been privately owned may potential...
Today healthcare cost is constantly rising. It is important to ensure that patient 's health are maintained and supported outside the clinical settings such as their homes and communities. Healthcare organizations play an important role in serving people to provide an effective health care and improve the patients ' outcome. They focus on activities and strategies to provide a high quality care for many communities. This is their way of helping people and their community healthy. Organizations have a way of improving the patient 's outcome through monitoring of patients especially those who have high medical needs.
If we accept the price declining effect of managed care, the states should build down the regulations of managed care institutions. However, better information of the population and the health sector actor is crucial to avoid the previous misinterpretations. Moreover, the managed care institutions have to be incentivized to create contracts that are available and acceptable for less healthy people also.
There are various definitions of “models of care”. However, the most important feature remains how health care services are delivered. Model of care was defined more precisely as a conceptual tool which is a standard that associates concept, belief and intent linked in several ways (1). This implies people getting care when it is required, with optimal utilization of resources and by the appropriate provider. ****find reference…..
Patients with chronic diseases do not receive established and operative treatments to help them successfully manage their condition. These complications are aggravated by an absence of organization of care for patients with chronic diseases. Nevertheless, the fundamental disintegration of the health care system is not unexpected given that health care providers do not have the imbursement support or other tools they need to interconnect and work together successfully to improve patient care (Brennan et al., 2009; Renders et al., 200;).
Primary health care is the indispensable care based on the real – world, systematically sound, socially adequate technique and technology which made unanimously available to the families and every individuals in the community through their fully involvement where the community is capable to afford at a cost to uphold at every phase of their growth in the essence of self-reliance and self-government. Primary health care in international health is associated with the global conference held at Alma Ata in 1978; the conference that promoted the initiative health for all by the year 2000. “Primary health care defined broadly at Alma Ata emphasized universal health care across to all individuals and families , encouraged participation by community members in all aspects of health care planning and implementation and promoted the delivery of care that would be scientifically sound , technically effective , socially relevant and acceptable” (Janice E.Hitchcock,2003). Primary health care is commonly viewed as a level of care or as the entry point to the health care system for its client. It can also taken to mean a particular approach to care which is concerned with containing care, accessibility, community involvement and collaboration between other sectors. The primary health care policy has some principals that have been designed to work together and be implemented simultaneously to bring about a better health outcome for the entire society.