Bayside Boat Case Study

2541 Words6 Pages

Step 1 In this case, for the boat orders between Andrew Woods and Bayside boats, some relevant law jurdistiction may apply to the case. One of them is the formation of contract incuding an offer and acceptance. Secondly, some other issue seems exist on the case above between Bayside and Ray’s boat supplies. It has a connection with the negotiation of the contract. Thirdly, tenders is also one of the important issue between Bayside and Prime Protective Coating that is going to be assessed on the step two. Step 2 On this case of the building of a boat for Andrew Woods, some implications of the relevant law is needed to solve the situation that arise from it. When an individual tries to get into a contract, some potential legal elements is available to assess whether the contract is legally binding or not. Every unethical conduct that has happened by a party has a different cosequenses depend on the relevant law itself. One of the key issue is …show more content…

During the tenders callouts by Bayside boat, they only stated that ‘supply of the paint and marine coatings for the yacht’. It defines that bayside boat only needs the paint and the marine coatings to be supplied into the yacht project. In addition, the tenders criteria stated that tenders would be assessed by the cheapest and the best quality. Those statements above are the terms implied on the tenders processed when a contract has been made. Implied terms have already made by Bayside boat that stated to supply the paint only. Its not Prime Coatings responsibility to paint the boat because its not implied and its not stated on the terms, it is supposed to be Bayside Boat responsibility to sets out the correct statement when calling out for a tender. So it seems that there is no legally binding terms for prime coatings to apply the paint and the coatings for the

More about Bayside Boat Case Study

Open Document