Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of marijuana ESSAY
The effects of marijuana thesis essay
Negative effects of marijuana essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of marijuana ESSAY
Aside from taking into consideration the possible tax revenues after legalization and adverse health effects associated with marijuana use, the issue of government enforcement of the laws still stands as a point of contention. Even five decades after the Equal Rights Act of 1964, there is disproportionate enforcement of the law on minorities, especially marijuana related laws. The anonymous author of “Government Must Legalize Marijuana” correctly claims that roughly 33% of marijuana related arrests were of African Americans, when Africans American comprise of only 14% of marijuana users. Federal laws call for equal enforcement of the law regardless of race or ethnicity. A disproportionate arrest of African Americans is a violation to their right to equality. In NYC from 1997-2006, 52% of those arrested for marijuana possession were African American, 31% Hispanic and 15% Caucasian (Levine). These numbers take on a new meaning when considering roughly 60% of Caucasians used marijuana at least once in their life, whereas 50% of African Americans and 44% of Hispanics used marijuana at least once in their life (Levine). The disparity between users and those arrested is the major argument for legalization of marijuana. Legalization of marijuana would circumvent the possibility of wrongful targeting of minorities. However, a harmful substance should not be legalized to alleviate wrongful targeting of minorities. In essence, laws should not be abolished because they are difficult to enforce.
Disproportionate arrests also inhibit minority members with records from attaining meaningful employment that would otherwise be within reach. Sabet argues that “isolating those with an arrest record” and preventing them from finding employment will ...
... middle of paper ...
...us. N.p., 26 Apr. 2006. Web. 26 Apr. 2014.
Levine, Harry, and Deborah Small. "Marijuana Arrest Crusade." University of California, Berkley. N.p., n.d. Web. 3 May 2014.
"Marijuana." National Institute on Drug Abuse. National Institute of Health, n.d. Web. 25 Apr. 2014.
"Marijuana Resource Center: State Laws Related to Marijuana." The White House. The White House, n.d. Web. 4 May 2014.
Miller, Skip. "Don't Legalize Marijuana." Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles Times, 28 Jan. 2010. Web. 17 Apr. 2014.
Miron, Jeffery, and Katherine Waldock. "The Budgetary Impact of Ending Drug Prohibition." CATO Institute. N.p., 27 Sept. 2010. Web. 3 May 2014.
"Ohio Laws & Penalties." Working to Reform Marijuana Laws. N.p., n.d. Web. 5 May 2014.
Sabet, Kevin. "There Are Smarter Ways to Deal With Marijuana Than Legalization." US News. U.S.News & World Report, 30 Oct. 2012. Web. 26 Apr. 2014.
Works Cited "The California Marijuana Vote." New Yorker 23 Dec 1996: 62+. Brookhiser, Richard. "Pot Luck." National Review 11 Nov 1996: 27+ Simmons, Michael. "Give Pot a Chance." Rolling Stone 26 Dec 1996: 111+. Rist, Curtis and Harrison, Laird. "Weed the People." People 21 Oct. 1996: 75+. Funk and Wagnall's Volume 23 "Marijuana" 1996 Baum, Dan. "California's Separate Peace." Rolling Stone 30 Oct. 1997: 43+ Brookhiser, Richard. "Lost in the Weed." U.S. News & World Report 3 Jan. 1997: 9 Buckley, William "Legalization of Marijuana Long Overdue" The Albuquerque Journal. Online. 8 June 1993.
Zeese, Kevin and William Ruzzamenti. “Should marijuana be legalized for medical uses?” Health Nov./Dec. 1993 Vol.7 Issue 7 page 23. http://ehostvgw8.epnet.com/delivery.asp?…3F&startHitNu m=1&rlStartHit=1&delType=FT.
"State Medical Marijuana Laws." Legislative News, Studies and Analysis. National Conference of State Legislatures, 2014. Web. Apr. 2014. .
Lately it seems that drug policy and the war on drugs has been in the headlines quite a lot. It is becoming increasingly apparent that the policies that the United States government takes against illegal drugs are coming into question. The mainstream media is catching on to the message of organizations and individuals who have long been considered liberal "Counter Culture" supporters. The marijuana question seems to be the most prevalent and pressed of the drugs and issues that are currently being addressed. The messages of these organizations and individuals include everything from legalization of marijuana for medical purposes, to full-unrestricted legalization of the drug. Of course, the status quo of vote seeking politicians and conservative policy makers has put up a strong resistance to this "new" reform lobby. The reasons for the resistance to the changes in drug policies are multiple and complex. The issues of marijuana’s possible negative effects, its use as a medical remedy, the criminality of distribution and usage, and the disparity in the enforcement of current drug laws have all been brought to a head and must be addressed in the near future. It is apparent that it would be irresponsible and wrong for the government to not evaluate it’s current general drug policies and perhaps most important, their marijuana policy. With the facts of racial disparity in punishment, detrimental effects, fiscal strain and most importantly, the history of the drug, the government most certainly must come to the conclusion that they must, at the very least, decriminalize marijuana use and quite probably fully legalize it.
Caulkins, J. P. (2013). Marijuana legalization: What everyone needs to know. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Simoni-Wastila, Linda, and Francis B. Palumbo. "Medical Marijuana Legislation: What We Know-- And Don't." Journal Of Health Care Law & Policy 16.1 (2013): 59-75. Academic Search Complete. Web. 20 Apr. 2014.
Quinn, Gregg. “Legalized marijuana should follow beer’s lead: Sleeman”. The Vancouver Sun. November 6 2013. Web. 03 Dec 2013
The budgetary implications of marijuana prohibition. Marijuana Policy Project, 2005. Nelson, Steve. A great idea. Marijuana Use
Legalization of marijuana has become an increasingly popular topic for debate in society, with “sentiment in favor of legalization [increasing] by 20 [percentage] points in just over a decade,” bringing support for legalization to 52% (Dionne and Galston). The most common arguments for reforming current legislation are the following: enforcement wastes public resources, taxation can provide a new source of revenue, and enforcement of current laws is discriminatory (Dionne and Galston). It is necessary to look at the impact on the primary stakeholders by analyzing the various harms and benefits through application of the ethical theories of utilitarianism and deontology, in order to determine the solution that will result in the best possible outcome. In determining the ethicality of legalizing marijuana, it is necessary to understand the background of the issue, and to identify the most important stakeholders. In the 1930s, many states began outlawing the substance; ironically California was the first of these states (Rendon).
Rosenthal, Ed, and Steve Kubby (2004) "Marijuana Should Be Legalized for Medical Use." Retrieved from Opposing Viewpoints: The War on Drugs.
Despite the 1976 ruling by the federal government that marijuana has “no acceptable medical use”, sixteen states have passed medical marijuana laws that allow for patient use o...
"Myths and Facts About Marijuana." Marijuana: The Facts. Drug Policy Alliance Network. 27 Apr. 2009.
With America’s war on drugs being highly focused on the increased use of marijuana, there is not much time for officers to focus on crimes of greater importance. Crimes related to illegal marijuana use are becoming more problematic due to drug deals that go bad, occasionally ending with murder. It has been estimated that one marijuana-related arrest is made every 42 seconds. With marijuana being illegal, keeping crime related activities under control cost the United States approximately twenty billion dollars per year (Sledge). According to Brian Bremner and Vincent Del Giudice, “A 2010 study by the libertarian Cato Institute, forecasted that states could save $17.4 billion annually from reduced drug enforcement costs and increased tax revenue, assuming marijuana production and sales were legal nationwide” (11). Several law enforcement hours are exhausted with pursing, questioning, and arresting citizens that are in possession of or consuming marijuana. There would be a decrease in the number of misdemeanor possession cases that are pending hearing. These cases would be dismissed, decreasing costs affiliated with each case. There are excessive numbers of people who remain incarcerated for nonviolent crimes related to illegal marijuana use. Legalizing marijuana would allow these people to be released, opening jail space for the true criminals. Legalizing marijuana would free up law enforcement officers from focusing on illegal marijuana use and allow focus to be put on more serious
“Legalization of Marijuana: An Overview.” Points of View: Legalization of Marijuana (2013):1. Points of View Reference Center. Web. The Web.
The "Marijuana Policy Project." Frequently Asked Questions -. N.p., n.d. Web. The Web. The Web.