The Pros And Cons Of Employment Discrimination

1105 Words3 Pages

Discrimination can be commonly found in social environments, but it is not only limited to just that. Cases of discrimination can also be found, and is more common than it should be, in employment situations. An employee can be discriminated against due to a variety of reasons by another employee, or sometimes a manager or supervisor, both of which are absolutely unacceptable and unprofessional from both a civil rights and a business standpoint. To protect workers’ rights, laws have been passed and enacted for the past fifty years to attempt to abolish discrimination in one of the more necessary areas of an individual’s life, the workplace. Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act is seen as the most important law in combating employment discrimination
Title VII strictly forbids any form of discrimination to take place in the workplace, including, but not limited to, promotions, firing, pay, use of company facilities, as well as other conditions of employment. (FindLaw) Title VII covers almost every aspect of discrimination in an individual’s employment; however, a fault with Title VII is that the anti-discriminatory laws are only applicable if the employer has a minimum of fifteen current employees at the time a case of discrimination has taken place. (FindLaw) Although Title VII was originally signed into law in 1964, exactly 50 years ago, differing acts can be amended to it, such as the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978, to help further the scope of protection amongst the workers who may be subject to workplace discrimination amongst the United
Employers have to look at pregnancy the same was another condition affecting the working ability in their sick leave programs, medical benefit programs, or disability plans. For example, an employer cannot discriminate against a pregnant woman and place her on unpaid leave, while place other employees with other conditions on light-duty. Such is the case of Peggy Young, a UPS package deliverer who became pregnant and placed on unpaid leave despite trying to reason with the company to allow her to work on light duty. The incident happened back in 2006, but just now has reached the level of the Supreme Court (Huffington Post). UPS has just recently made clear in a memo to the company’s employees that starting 2015, pregnant workers will be offered light duty. UPS can use this change as a defense for the Supreme Court hearing, but it should be overlooked due to the fact that UPS had offered light duty to other employees with different conditions, yet forbid Peggy Young to work during her pregnancy which directly violated the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act which was amended to Title VII which states, “women affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions shall be treated the same for all employment-related purposes, including receipt of benefits under fringe benefit programs, as other persons not so affected but similar in their

Open Document