Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Elizabethan period
Much speculation has arisen over why Shakespeare wrote Julius Caesar. Some say he was he was predicting what would happen should civil war break out in England. Shakespeare lived from 1564 to
1616 in the Elizabethan era. Julius Caesar was written in 1599, near the end of the Queen’s reign.
Elizabeth was growing old and still had no heir; the future ruler of England lay in question. Undoubtedly, multiple candidates would strive for the throne, but the people would ultimately choose who would succeed through their support. However, could people, who were motivated by such base things, be trusted to make the right decision? This is one of the questions Shakespeare attempts to answer in Julius
Caesar. Taking place after the Roman Civil War, the plot revolves not around the title character, but the conspirators who wish to kill him, Brutus and Cassius. They fear Caesar will make himself king and the
Roman Republic will fall; to prevent this, they assassinate him. They announce to the people that they did it for the good of Rome. Unfortunately, the Roman people are persuaded by Mark Antony that
Caesar was virtuous and the conspirators are traitors, resulting in another civil war between the triumvirs – Antony, Octavius, and Lepidus – and the conspirators. Brutus and Cassius lose this war, and the Republic dies with them. The Roman mob plays an important role, as their support is necessary for each side to succeed. Both factions attempt to manipulate them, but the triumvirs are victorious because they appeal to the mob’s basic nature instead of trying to reason with them. This scathing view of the nature of man raises a larger question: if people are so base, can they be trusted to govern themselves? Is democracy doomed t...
... middle of paper ...
... A Short History." JohnKeane.net, 2013. Web. 13 Nov. 2013. .
2. Leithart, Peter J. "History: Julius Caesar." Brightest Heaven of Invention: A Christian Guide to Six Shakespeare Plays. Moscow, Id.: Canon, 1996. N. pag. Print.
3. "REPUBLIC vs. DEMOCRACY." Republic vs. Democracy. Law Notes, n.d. Web. 13 Nov. 2013. .
4. Shakespeare, William. Julius Caesar. New York, NY: Dover, 1991. Print.
5. Sproul, R. C. "Augustine: Doctor of Grace." The Consequences of Ideas: Understanding the Concepts That Shaped Our World. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2000. N. pag. Print.
6. Taylor, Christopher W. "Elizabethan Government." Elizabethan Government. Tennessee State University, n.d. Web. 13 Nov. 2013. .
Julius Caesar, born in 100 B.C, was a great Roman general and senator. He had a wife named Calpurnia yet no children. Though he was a memorable leader, Caesar was a physically weak man. He suffered from epilepsy and was deaf in one ear. In the beginning of the play, Caesar was returning to Rome in triumph after a successful military campaign against Pompey's sons. Caesar formed the first triumvirate with Crassus and Pompey. After the death of Crassus and Caesar's defeat of Pompey, Caesar gained autocrat power. A group of conspirators led by Brutus assassinated him and Cassius, who worried that Caesar, might aspire to become a dictator over the Roman republic. Julius Caesar was an arrogant and self-centered man who is also a pessimist.
Looking at Rome’s political struggles at the dawn of the first century B.C., it becomes apparent that the groundwork for Caesar’s Republic shattering revolt was lain down by Marius and Sulla. To be more specific, the stage was set by the class struggles between the Aristocracy, who demanded control of the Republic by virtue of tradition, and the masses, which demanded a voice.
The volatile political situation in Rome following the assassination of Gaius Julius Caesar (Caesar) was complex. Competing Caesarian and ‘Liberator’ factions were deadlocked by popular perceptions of Caesar and the legal ramifications of declaring him a tyrant. A compromise was struck to remove the shadow of guilt from the assassins while declaring all of Caesar’s acts as legal. By compromising all Roman nobles in power would retain the positions granted by Caesar; specifically Caesar’s great nephew and adopted son Gaius Octavius the Younger (Octavian) to keep the titles granted to him in Caesar’s will. (Dando-Collins, 2010) The Triumvirate , a trilateral commission of pro-Caesarian forces would win the battle and ultimately change the course of western history. This Political compromise set the conditions for the battle to come.
The last but the most important thing for you to know is the crowd will be the most powerful and uncontrollable mob to kill anyone for any reasons. The mob is angry, and people lose their heads. The conspiracy cannot make Roman people follow them as planned. Oppositely, the mob wants to kill the conspirators because you kill the Great Caesar in their mind. In that situation, all of you will flee away the city and in danger.
done good for Rome and his people, but after the conspirators persuade Brutus to join the conspiracy, by pointing out that Caesar is arrogant and hubris. Brutus justifies his beliefs towards
The conspirators thought they should kill Caesar because he was ambitious, and he certainly was. His conquests brought wealth and slaves to Rome. He was often seen with tears in his when
Julius Caesar’s ambition for power drove the honorable Brutus to think negatively about Julius Caesar’s position of being the King of Rome. Negatively speaking, Julius Caesar’s ways of having most of the power and deciding not to listen to others except the ones that only tell him things he likes to hear, drove the power-hungary conspirators and the honorable Brutus to take his life away. The honorable Brutus shows his love for Rome by committing an act which he seems best fit for his city. Trying everything he can to put Rome in a democracy, the only solution he saw was to join the conspirators to murder Caesar and explain to the people why they committed such an act. A great friend of Julius Caesar Mark Antony, stood up for many things Caesar had in mind and he was one of the few that Caesar thought was very trustworthy besides Brutus. After Caesar’s death, Mark Anthony told Caesar that he will take revenge for him and that shows great passion for the love that he had for him.
William Shakespeare's The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is a tragic drama, set in Ancient Rome about the horrendous death of Julius Caesar. Brutus, leader of the conspiracy against Caesar, begins as Caesar’s friend. Cassius, instigator of the conspirator, manipulates Brutus into killing Caesar. Brutus agrees to this plan because of his plans for Rome. The bond between these two connects when Brutus agrees to Cassius about killing Caesar for the best of Rome. Cassius, very power hungry, comes up with a plan that will succeed in both of them killing Caesar. They both rely on each other because they want the power that Caesar has been requested to make the best of Rome. This dream of making Rome better was manipulated by Cassius to Brutus. However,
...was not ambitious and they go to track down the rest of the conspirators for killing the great, and noble Caesar.
Michael Crawford also documents the Roman Empires political structures. He writes how it went through the transition from a monarchy, early in the empires existence, to a Republic where the people had more say over the countries actions. He discusses the political scheme of Rome and how ''Senators'' were chosen and served the empire. Crawford states how the governing class of Rome seemed to question and change its idea of what the government should be on a regular basis. ''The prevailing ideology of the Roman governing class was one which facilitated change, including in the end, the abolition of the Roman government itself''(Crawford 1). This quotation suggests to the reader the ever-changing ideas of the Roman people and how they viewed their governing body.
Julius Caesar Act I Graphic Organizer Name Character Notes Important Quotes Evidence of Loyalty (to whom?) Flavius Annoyed with the crowd because they are too fickle. It is no matter.
...they backed Caesar (such as Brutus). Ultimately Julius Caesar was stabbed 23 times, his opponents wanted him dead, and in fact stabbed many of their co-conspirators in the fight . They were not honorable at all in killing him.
The first reason behind Mark Antony’s motivation is that he wants the Roman People to listen to him now that Caesar is dead. Mark Antony was already the general of the Roman Army and Caesar’s right hand man, he wanted Romans to do what he told them to do. Mark Antony was well respected and gained the trust of the crowd when he was giving his speech at Caesar’s funeral. He gained the control of the crowd because of a will that Caesar supposedly wrote. In it Antony says that Caesar left Rome to them, all of his orchards, parks, and gardens to the citizens. What really got the crowd under Antony’s control was what every citizen was to receive. “Here is the will, and under Caesar’s seal. / To every Roman Citizen he gives, / To every several man, seventy – five drachmas.” (III.ii.241-243). Back then this was a substantial amount of money. And the crowd was r...
In “The tragedy of Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare it covers the life of Caesar and the tragic death he experienced. Caesar was a Roman politician and general that played a critical role that led the Roman republic to its demise and then further led to the rise of the Roman empire. Caesar was in fact assassinated by his followers and friends because Caesar was accused of tyranny.
Secondary sources Grant, M., 1969. The "Julius Caesar." London: Chancellor Press, 2003. Meier, C., 1996. "The 'Me The "Caesar".