Wireless LAN Connections as an Alternative to Network Cables

1093 Words3 Pages

INTRODUCTION Wireless LAN is an option to the network cables you might be using to connect your computers at home or the office. Several variants are out there like HomeRF, various so called IEEE 802.11 (Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers) standards, LAN(Local Area Network) over DECT, Bluetooth, etc.If have to buy a wireless LAN right now, go for one of the 802.11b (cheap, but less secure) or 802.11g (bit more expensive, but faster and more secure) variants. Wireless LAN is sometimes referred to as WiFi, however, WiFi is in even a certification by WECA. It "guarantees" that devices are up to standard. Data transfer speeds vary from 1 Mbps (Bluetooth) up to 54 Mbps (802.11g and 802.11a). For normal Internet use, 1 Mbps should be sufficient. For copying larger files between two PC's and/or a server requires a bit more (depends on your patience). For multimedia purposes (streaming video), 11 Mbps should be OK. Keep in mind though, that most WiFi solutions, only reach half of their "claimed" speeds! PROBLEM STATEMENT Problem statement Overview As with wired LAN systems; the actual throughput in WLAN is product and set-up dependent. The factors affecting throughput include the number of users, diffusion factors such as distance and multipath, the type of WLAN system employed, as well as the hibernate and bottlenecks on wireless portions of the LAN. Throughput is to be defined as the ratio of the expected delivered data payload to the expected transmission time. It is the percentage of not to be diverted data packets received without errors. Moreover, most voice and video applications prefer very small payload sizes to ensure reliable and minimum delay service delivery. Throughput is what the user... ... middle of paper ... ... status become finished. As you can see, there are difference results in Mbps column from both sides. It because the both side has a different speed for Bits per second. You also can save the result by click on print button to refer for next time. CONCLUSION The conclusions to derive from this report on speed testing are that: Precision is only as good as the testing application’s ability to provide the details that validate the test results. Not all speed testers are common and should not be compared unless the differences in their methodology are taken into consideration. The results from a speed tester should proclaim the method used to conduct the test, otherwise the results are meaningless. The test method must coordinate to the application profile for the results to be of value when assessing the performance expectation of that application.

More about Wireless LAN Connections as an Alternative to Network Cables

Open Document