Why did Fanon Argue for a Violent Struggle Against Colonialism?

1845 Words4 Pages

In the second half of the twentieth century, started a process of decolonization, first in Asia and then in Africa. In 1949, India was one of the first country to gain its independence, followed by Burma, Malaysia, and Ceylon. In Africa the decolonization started a few years later, first in Libya and Egypt, and in the rest of the continent afterwards. The main colonists were the Great Britain and France. The history has shown that Great Britain succeeded to decolonize generally in peace while France had much more problems to give up its colonies, which led to numerous conflicts opposing the colonists and the colonized. It has been the case especially in Algeria where a murderous war lasted almost eight years. The philosopher Frantz Fanon has studied the outbreak of this conflict as he was working in Algeria and he spent some time working on the question of colonialism, drawing the conclusion that violence was the only way to get rid of colonists. This essay will analyse who was Fanon and why he came to such a conclusion along with the reasons why it could be said that he is right ,and finally, the arguments against his statement. Finally, it will aim to prove that even though Fanon had valid points, diplomacy could have been for efficient and less tragic rather than his support to violence.

Frantz Fanon was born on July 20th 1925 in Fort-de-France, Martinique. His biographer, Alice Cherki (2000) wrote that being part of the middle-class, his childhood was relatively happy and privileged but things changed when French naval troops where blockaded in Martinique after the invasion of Nazis in France. Indeed inhabitants experienced a violent racism and the scorn of the sailors towards natives. It is the first negative experienc...

... middle of paper ...

...3), Fanon: The Postcolonial Imagination. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Gordon, L. R. (1996), ‘Fanon’s Tragic Revolutionary Violence’ in Denean Sharpley-Whiting, T., Gordon, L. R. and White, R. T. (eds.) Fanon: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 297-308.

Hall, S. (1996), ‘The After-life of Frantz Fanon: Why Fanon? Why now? Why Black Skin, White Masks?’ in Read, A. (ed.) The Fact of Blackness, Frantz Fanon and Visual Representation. Seattle: Bay Press, pp. 12-37.

Taylor, C. (1997), ‘The politics of recognition’, in Heble, A., Palmateer Pennee, D. and Struthers, J. R. (eds.) New Contexts of Canadian Criticism. Peterborough: Broadview Press Ltd, pp. 25-73.

Gates, H. L. (1991), ‘Critical Fanonism’, Critical Inquiry, 17 (3), pp. 457-70, Chicago Journal [Online]. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/view/1343794 (Accessed: 10 March 2014).

Open Document