Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Core concepts of motivation
Motivation and their implication
Core concepts of motivation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Core concepts of motivation
Motivation is defined as the factors that lead to the desire of employees to perform to their fullest of abilities in order to meet the goals set the by the organization as a whole, and also to meet personal aims set by the employees themselves. Motivation requires commitment and effort which can consequently lead to a significant increase in productivity and efficiency. An essential feature of motivation is that it’s an intangible concept, it is invisible and internal (Pinder, 1998). Managers constantly seek new methods to stimulate their employees into putting more effort into their jobs. Although containing contradictory ideologies, different motivation models, such as Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory (Herzberg, 1959) and Taylor’s Scientific Management or Taylorism(Taylor, 1911), have served as a basis to managers on how to increase motivation or keep it at a constant high level throughout. Both these models contradict in the sense that Taylor suggests money is the sole factor that leads to motivation whereas Herzberg concludes that there are other factors that lead to positive stimulation.
Herzberg’s theory includes motivators and hygiene factors (Herzberg, 1959). In basic theory, motivators are factors which lead to an employee’s desire to work harder in order to meet pre-set goals. These include: achievement, recognition for achievement, advancement, responsibility and job challenge. Hygiene factors are those which do not motivate, but in their absence there would be a notable demotivation amongst employees, which include: working conditions, company policy and administration, supervision, salary, job security and relationship with others. On the other hand, Taylor’s scientific management theory (Taylor, 1911) was based upon th...
... middle of paper ...
...nce improvement: research and recommendations, Contemporary Management Research, Vol. 4, No, 1, pp 43-56, March 2008
• Rowley (1996) Motivation and academic staff in higher education. MCB University Press 4(3):11-6.
• Sinclair, R.R., Tucker, J.S., Cullen, J.S., Wright, C. (2005). Performance differences among four organizational commitment profiles. J. Applied Psychology 90(6):1280-7.
• Taylor, F.W. (1911), The principles of scientific management. Harper & Brothers, New York & London
• Vroom, V. H. (1964) Work and motivation. Wiley, New York
• Wiley, C. (1997). What motivates employees according to over 40 years of motivation surveys, International journal of manpower, 18(3), p263-280 quoted from Ghazanfar, F., Chuanmin, S., Khan, M. M. & Bashir, M.(2011). A study of relationship between satisfaction with compensation and work motivation, Vol. 2, No. 1; January 2001
Taylor, F. W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. In F. W. Taylor, The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper & Row.
Modern History Sourcebook: Frederick W. Taylor: The Principles of Scientific Management, 1911 . [WWW document]. URL: http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1911taylor.html
helpful individual, and others viewed his work as being inconsistence and spotty at times. Rios is required to submit a formal performance evaluation on all of her workers, and Barlow’s performance appraisal was the most challenging yet she had to face. Lack of Motivation Barlow’s behavior at the TA can be simply defined as lack of motivation, and this can be further explained in depth by the use of expectancy theory. The expectancy model states, “People are motivated to work when they expect to achieve things they want from their jobs. A basic premise of the expectancy model is that employees are rational people. They think about what they have to do to be rewarded and how much the rewards mean to them before they perform their jobs.” (Hellriegel, Slocum, Woodman, 2001, p.146) In addition, Hellriegel, Slocum, and Woodman also explained, individuals decide their jobs that are based on their needs, motivations and past experiences. Decisions about how much to produce, how much to work and the quality of workmanship (job-performance decisions) are solely depend on the individual’s level of motivation. In another words, as it stated in the text, “the expectancy model holds that work motivation is determined by individual beliefs regarding effort-performance relationships and the desirability of various work outcomes associated with different performance levels…Unless an individual believes that effort lead to some desired performance level, he or she will not make much of an effort. ” (Hellriegel, Slocum, Woodman, 2001, p.147) In relation to Barlow, he could not find a reason to be motivated at the TA. First, through his past performance evaluation, he had been rated a score of three consecutively for the past four years. The scores were a punishment itself because he had no way to determine his performance. Regardless Barlow performed well or not, the same score will be given; this caused Barlow to become careless about his job because he saw no reward in his effort; no reason be to motivated. His attitude toward his job was manifest through his work, which was the cause of the incidents. Secondly, Barlow saw no reward from his position. He had secured his position with his expertise and his background knowledge of the TA. When the whistle-blower incident occurred, he was accused of being responsible for the incident; however, neither the TA nor anyone could ...
One of the many opportunities we have in the United States today is access to an education. I believe that being educated by teachers is very important. There are many benefits for pursuing a college degree. A few valuable advantages of higher education are African-Americans (and other minorities), like me, are able to be educated, job security, and a great salary. When I was growing up, my mom always let my siblings and I know the importance of education. For example, if I did not know the meaning of a word, my mom would say, “Look it up in the dictionary.” This taught me to read and research information instead of asking my mom for the answer. Every summer my brother, sister and I always participated in the Children’s Summer Reading Program at the Kalamazoo Public Library. My mom
Yet, despite the criticism, Herzberg’s theory still holds merit in many managerial situations. Experts have built their theories on the foundations of the motivator-hygiene theory to better explain worker motivation. Among the most prominent is the expectancy theory or Victor
Taylor, Frederick Winslow (1911), The Principles of Scientific Management, New York, NY, USA and London, UK: Harper & Brothers
Levy, Paul E. Industrial Organizational Psychology. New York: Worth, 2013. Print. The. Laird, Dugan, Sharon S. Naquin, and Elwood F. Holton.
Research has shown that motivation in an employee is an important factor which determines his performance. Motivation is the “driving force within individuals” (Mullins, 2007, p. 285). It is the concerned with finding out the reasons which shape and direct the behaviour of the individuals. The people act to achieve something so that they can satisfy some needs (Gitman and Daniel, 2008). It is important for the manager to understand this motivation of individual employees in order to inspire them and devise an appropriate set of incentives and rewards which would satisfy the needs that they have individually (Kerr, 2003). Once these needs are expected to be met in return for some specific behaviour or action, they would work more diligently to have that behaviour in them and to achieve that objective (Meyer and Hersovitch, 2001). Since it would lead to early and fuller achievement of the company objectives as the individual would work more diligently, it would lead to better organizational performance (Wiley, 1997).
Robbins and Judge define motivation by means of three elements. The first element is defined as being the process that account for an individual’s intensity which is concerned with how hard a person tries. The second element is direction that benefits the organization and the third element is persistence which is a measure of how long a person can maintain effort. Motivation is also driven by certain situations that vary between individuals and within individuals, at different times. (Robbins & Judge, 2007, p.186) These elements should not only be expected from employees but from managers as well.
In daily life, we need motivation to improve our performance in our job or in studies. Motivation is an internal force, dependent on the needs that drive a person to achieve. In the other words, motivation is a consequence of expectations of the future while satisfaction is a consequence of past events (Carr, 2005). We need to give reward to our self when we did correctly or we has achieve our target. Reward is something that we are given because we have behaved well, worked hard, or provided a service to the community. Theories of motivation can be used to explain the behavior and attitude of employees (Rowley, 1996; Weaver, 1998). The theories include content theories, based on assumptions that people have individual needs, which motivate their action. Meanwhile according to Robbins (2001), motivation is a needs-satisfying process, which means that when a person's needs are satisfied by certain factors, the person will exert superior effort toward attaining organizational goals. Schulze and Steyn (2003) affirmed that in order to understand people’s behavior at work, managers or supervisors must be aware of the concept of needs or motives which will help “move” their employees to act.Theories such as Maslow (1954), McClelland (1961), Herzberg (1966) and Alderfer (1969) are renowned for their works in this field. The intrinsic reward or also be known as motivators factors is the part of Herzberg motivation theory. Motivators are involve factors built into the job or the studies itself such as achievement, recognition, responsibility and advancement. Hygiene factors are extrinsic to the job such as interpersonal relationship, salary, supervision and company policy (Herzberg, 1966. There have two factors that are called hygiene fac...
This essay will discuss the relevance of Taylor’s Principles of Scientific Management to organisations today. Taylor’s theory of Scientific Management is based around how efficiently a member of staff works in order to improve their productivity, the theory was introduced in 1911 and has four principles which were tested to determine optimal work methods, and are still seen in organisations today such as fast-food restaurants. Taylor believed that workers left to their own devices would restrict their output and not progress with the task, this was called ‘soldiering’ and it was described in two forms; natural
Kovach KA (1987). What motivates employees? Workers and supervisors give different answers. Business Horizons, 30. 58-65. Print. 8 Feb. 2014.
Motivation is the force that transforms and uplifts people to be productive and perform in their jobs. Maximizing employee’s motivation is a necessary and vital to successfully accomplish the organization’s targets and objectives. However, this is a considerable challenge to any organizations managers, due to the complexity of motivation and the fact that, there is no ready made solution or an answer to what motivates people to work well (Mullins,2002).
Motivation, as defined in class, is the energy and commitment a person is prepared to dedicate to a task. In most of organisations, motivation is one of the most troublesome problems. Motivation is about the intensity, direction and persistence of reaching a goal. During the class, we have learned a substantial theories of motivation and many theories of motivations are used in real business. Each theory seems to have different basic values. But, they all have been analysed for one reason, recognising what motivates and increases the performance of employees. Ident...
Job satisfaction represents one of the most complex areas facing today’s managers when it comes to managing their employees. Many studies have demonstrated an unusually large impact on the job satisfaction on the motivation of workers, while the level of motivation has an impact on productivity, and hence also on performance of business organizations. There is a considerable impact of the employees’ perceptions for the nature of his work and the level of overall job satisfaction. Financial compensation