Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is in a name
Compare and contrast creation vs evolution
What is in a name
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is in a name
“We have been through all this before. Really,” The Name sighed.
She suppressed the “With who?” thought. And promptly said, “With who?”
“With the Concepts,” The Name said.
“Now, the Concepts, as they are called, are creatures of Before. They belong to the one who is called Greatness. Greatness ‑‑ in truth, the word does not do the person of Greatness justice ‑‑ is rather large in scope, and Names are too small to describe this person. The Concepts were called into existence by Greatness, by a mistake Greatness once made. The Concepts knows this, and uses this fact prodigiously.”
The Name had a strange look, as if concentrating.
“What are the Concepts? The easiest way to talk about them, is to consider them to be alive. Based on a mistake, but alive, for when Greatness makes a mistake... well, you know. Names are Names of Power. That is, if there is a Name called Talk, then that is all that that Name does. The Name Talks. Not necessarily verbally, nor overly much, but, the Name Talks. Now, a Name can be a Concept. However, a Concept is not necessarily a Name, since a Name depends on somebody saying something.”
“The Concepts, being of Greatness, is more ancient than Time. Very much more ancient than Time. Time depends on sequence, and sequence is as simple as the natural numbers. So Sequence comes before Time, at the same Time as Time became Time. An easier way to say this, is to say that Sequence is greater than Time. Now, everybody knows all this, even if only intuitively, because `There is no new thing under the sun'. This, the Preacher said.”
“But he did not...”, and was stopped short. The thoughts racing to and from The Name with her were strange, and new and yet very very old.
“No h...
... middle of paper ...
...oring after-ward?” she asked for almost everyone.
“Simply because they have been done before, and all one learns from them is one's own power in doing someone else's love. To do one's own loves is love indeed, and, because of creation's lack of purpose there is no way to do one's own unique and new loves. I also, have no purpose in creation, for I have learnt the loves of it. So what is to be done? One does good, and one hopes that creation passes quickly.”
“So then creation is a place to learn other's loves?”
“Yes, for you know it is so,” many said in unity.
“Creation is used for learning the pitfalls of other's sensual loves, even though the earth's original purpose is much different,” The Name said.
“Original purpose? Be fruitful and multiply! For there be few that find Life,” The Name said.
“Why creation? For I felt that way,” and The Name, sighed.
Frost, S. E. Basic Teachings of the Great Philosophers: a Survey of Their Basic Ideas.
In the excerpt from The Signature of All Things by Elizabeth Gilbert this was shown to us by the Alma, Henry Whitaker's daughter. She observed something that was more thrilling than anything she has ever seen and because she asked to be apart of, she was allowed to be a part of something meaningful to her. An individuals has the power to create a meaningful life if they strive for what they value in life, because if they don’t try as hard as they could they will not be able to live a purposeful life.
things are called ideas. His argument was the nature of the ideas which make up
One of the main scriptural points in the lesson is from Song of Solomon that expresses that the heart should not ‘arouse love until it so desires’ and argues that “this verse points to there being a right time for “love” to be aw...
If it be allowed that no idea nor anything like an idea can exist in an unperceiving substance, then surely it follows, that no figure or mode of extension which we can either perceive or imagine, or have any idea of, an be really inherent in matter. (Three Dialogues 139)
During the 17th century, there was a man named Francis Bacon and he did more for the theory of thought than any other person during that time. He created a paper called The Four Idols which outlined the essential creation of psychology and thought as it would pervade through the years. These idols would eventually give birth to many modern ideas such as semantics (the study of linguistics and logic as it applies to meaning). His idols would outline some of the fundamental thinking processes that are part of any person’s mentality. These idols also affected how the world would view themselves, with his ideas challenging many parts of the mainstream accepted ideas and ways of thinking. With this essay, he directly attacks areas of philosophy,
"All statements are true in some sense, false in some sense, meaningless in some sense, true and false in some sense, true and meaningless in some sense, false and meaningless in some sense, and true and false and meaningless in some sense" — Malaclypse the Younger. Truth is a fact that has been verified. There are many procedures that must be completed for something to be considered truth. Truth in its full extension is an intellectual aspect of reality that is unchanging, internally harmonious, universal and without error. However false is something that cannot be proven but, instead false can be debated. In this Theory of Knowledge essay it will be shown that there are no absolute distinctions between what is true and what is false.”
''Our world is only one of a myriad of worlds that evolve and dissolve in something called the boundless'' (Gaarder, Josetin 34)
“It was a new discovery to find that these stories were, after all, about our own lives, were not distant, that there was no past or future that all time is now-time, centred in the being.” (Pp39.)
John Scotus Eriugena was one of the first metaphysical philosopher of the middle ages and his philosophical intention was to understand and categorize all of reality. First, Eriugena divided nature into two classifications: “Things that are” and “Things that are not”. His inspiration came from non-other than the “platonic supposition that there is a hierarchy of being.” (Page 121) The “Things that
The main relevant ideas of the treatise were the four rules of thinking. The first rule, in his own words was “never to accept anything for true which I did not clearly know to be such.” This sentence remains one of the most influential quotes in the foundation of modern science. The second rule was to divide each of difficulties under examination into as many parts as po...
After reading Berkeley’s work on the Introduction of Principles of Human Knowledge, he explains that the mental ideas that we possess can only resemble other ideas and that the external world does not consist of physical form or reality but yet they are just ideas. Berkeley claimed abstract ideas as the source of philosophy perplexity and illusion. In the introduction of Principles of Human Knowledge,
Masterman, M. (1970). The Nature of a Paradigm. In I. Lakatos, & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and The Growth of Knowledge (pp. 59-90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
"The important thing is not so much that every child should be taught, as every child should be instilled with the wish to learn."