Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The correlation between poverty and crime
The correlation between poverty and crime
The correlation between poverty and crime
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The correlation between poverty and crime
The connections among wealth and poverty, housing and education and war and crime are apparent when looking at the data provided from the Atlas of the Real World. The wealth of a country is a key factor in the success of the education system. If a country can afford to maintain and develop their education system, the people will benefit. It is crucial to understand the general statistics of each: wealth and poverty; housing and education; and war and crime before analyzing how each connects with the other. If a population is educated, those individuals are likely to be wealthier than those who are uneducated; this same population is also prone to less violent crime. Also, if a given population can provide for themselves, then the living situation will be better off. Also, the more stable the dwellings are, the more secure the inhabitants will be.
Wealth and Poverty
It is obvious by looking at the maps within the wealth and poverty subheading in the Atlas of the Real World that developed nations are wealthier than developing nations. Over a span of the past 60 years, the wealthiest countries in terms of US dollars have been the United Kingdom, New Zealand, the United States, United Arab Emirates, France and Switzerland: all developed countries. On the opposite end of the spectrum, one might predict that developing countries, such as a majority of the countries in Africa and South Asia, would be among the poorest in the world; one would be correct in their assumption. Data supports this statement; Chad, Niger, DR Congo, Botswana and Malawi are among the many African countries placing last in the wealth category. “The industrial revolution… enormously increased the capacity of some groups, mostly Europeans at first, to produce g...
... middle of paper ...
...ousing, a highly educated population, obviously more wealth and less violent deaths due to crime. Although they did have more prisoners in total, this was because of the steady, effective judicial systems as opposed to third-world countries who fail to capture criminals at all.
Works Cited
Cappelli, P. (2008). School of dreams: more education is not an economic elixir [Electronic version]. Issues in Science and Technology, 24(4), 59-64.
Dorling, D., Newman, M., & Barford, A. (2008). The atlas of the real world. New York, NY: Thames and Hudson Inc.
Minerd, J. (2000). How governments can promote wealth [Electronic version]. Futurist, 34(5), 8.
Dan Usher. (1997). Education as a deterrent to crime. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 30(2), 367-384. Retrieved from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=12615859&Fmt=2&clientId=44880& RQT=309&VName=PQD
Unlike the North – a term in vogue today, among others, for highlighting the difference between the rich, industrialised nations of mostly Western Europe, North America, Australasia, and the rudimentary economies of Latin America, Asia and Africa – underdevelopment, characterised by low income levels, poverty, low living standards and other socio-economic ills seem to be a defining feature of countries in these regions, collectively described as the Global South. Thomas (2003), Hershberg and Moreno-Brid(2003), and, Solimano(2005) suggest, for instance, that the socio - economic structure of most Latin American countries remains defined by vast inequalities in income and wealth distribution, poverty, volatile growth, high mortality rate and a high level of economic vulnerability. In Asia, a number of countries including the large economies of India and China have made improvements in the 21st century in terms of reducing poverty. Yet, 22% of the developing countries in Asia live on a dollar a day . The situation is bleaker in the South and Southeast Asia region where 38% leave on less than a dollar a day and over 48% of the population living below the regions individual country poverty line . Likewise, absolute poverty is on the rise in Africa - generally recognised as the world’s richest continent in terms of natural resources - despite a recorded decline in global poverty rates (Bhattacharyya: 2005).
Africa is the second largest continent in the world and has a thriving population of over 900 million people. In his book Guns Germs and Steel, Jared Diamond explains why he thinks that the West has more cargo than Africa. After reading the first two chapters of his book I found out that I share a lot of the same views as he does. I believe that Africa has so little material wealth compared to the West because of government, economy, disease, and geography or climate. All of these things are big issues in present day Africa and even back in the late 1800's. If we take into consideration an African country such as Zimbabwe and research all of these specific problems happening there we may get a better view on why Africa has very little material wealth compared to the Western world.
Some argue that colonization help countries develop faster through industrial revolution and bring modern civilization to the once “underdeveloped” country. Dr. Walter Williams wrote in 2011 that the United States, Australia, and Hong Kong were once colonies and now they’re the superpower countries in the world, but countries that were never colonized like Nepal continued to stay in poverty and is considered a third world country. I argue that colonization does not have to do anything with poverty. For example, the Philippines was conquered by the Spanish for more than 300 years, yet the Philippines is still considered a third world country amongst many southeast Asian countries. In addition, Jamaica was a colony under the British Empire much like the United States, but there is a drastic difference in wealth between the two countries today. Therefore, although the United States and Hong Kong are great examples, colonization does not affect the wealth of the colonized
"Letter to the Editors Why Are Many People in Developing Countries Poor?" Poverty. N.p., n.d. Web. 22 May 2014.
Historically, economic growth has proven to be civilization’s most effective weapon against poverty. Capitalist institutions – competitive markets, strengthened by private property rights secured by the rule of law – have provided extremely powerful incentives for a continuous stream of innovation and entrepreneurship that has fueled the growth of production. Regardless of resource endowments, culture, or other characteristics, countries that have adopted the key institutions of capitalism have experienced the highest levels of economic growth, and have seen the biggest improvements in citizens’ standards of living. Conversely, those that have failed to establish capitalist institutions have created little wealth, and have suffered the frustration of stagnating per capita incomes or, as in much of Africa, the slide into ever-worsening
Economic growth has delivered prosperities and the world population has unmistakably benefited from it. But it had delivered prosperities unequally. In the last few decades, inequality has become much higher in OECD nations. In the meanwhile, one fifth of the world live is earning just 2% of global income, while the rich are getting increasingly richer and middle class income has fallen flat. The global economy
Race and wealth play a significant role in the education of children. Studies show disproportionate reading and math levels of students of color vs white students. Studies have also shown disproportionate behavior consequences and suspensions. Students coming from wealthier families receive more opportunities. Students from less well-off families oftentimes do not get those opportunities.
The idea of Ethiopia rising due to skyrocketing GDP growth raises questions. Is Ethiopia rising for Ethiopians or for multinationals and foreigners in Ethiopia? Though growth increases, the ownership of assets of production are most likely in the hands of foreign firms rather than indigenous Ethiopians which likely results in capital flights. High growth is propelled by increasing foreign investment in Ethiopia. In 2005 with GDP growth of 11.819%, Ethiopia records $14.79 billion in net foreign assets whilst Mauritius records $145.835 billion with a growth of 1.241% (The World Bank, 2016). The failure of GDP to reveal the distribution of wealth in terms of asset ownership makes it an insufficient measure of equality hence economic
To understand the developing countries and their aim of identification, it can be mentioned that “The great battleground for the defense and expansion of freedom today is the whole southern half of the globe, the lands of the rising peoples. Their revolution is the greatest in human history. They seek an end to injustice, tyranny and exploitation. More than an end, they seek a beginning” John F. Kennedy 1961. The south or third world countries are; “group of countries which have colonial histories and which are in the process of developing economically and socially from a status characterized by low incomes , dependence on agriculture, weakness in trading relations, social deprivation for large segments of society, and restricted political and civil liberties” (Smith, 1996, p:1). Nevertheless, third world countries can be considered the developing countries regarding the influences and affects that have been made to them and their nation by the greater power that they were ruled by.
To feel the pain of the tightening connection between education and wealth inequalities, one need look no further than state-level higher education reforms. In particular, the Michigan Education Trust (MET) college savings account policy reveals how the ongoing tragedy of exorbitant higher education costs prevents the poor from saving for college. Thousands of financially disadvantaged Michigan students have already attended college thanks to the MET, yet thousands still have not. However, families who have few marketable assets have little money and, consequently, little incentive to deposit money in MET savings accounts. Lacking objects of monetary value such as homes and cars, sellable for profit, and liquid assets like saveable wages, impoverished
In the last two decades several countries notably China, Brazil, India and many others have experienced economic prosperity which has created an emerging middle-class and propel a portion of their population out of poverty. There is also an emerging middle-class in many African countries by their own standards (Juma). These countries have not arrived yet their remarkable economic growths could be replicated in our
Rodney’s argument is broken down into six chapters each consisting of several subdivisions and case studies supporting his principle argument. The first chapter works towards defining the terms of development and underdevelopment and argues the comparative nature of these terms; a country is only ‘underdeveloped’ by European standards. This chapter begins by tracing European development from its early stages of communalism through feudalism and finally capitalism. Then, he works towards developing an understanding of the term ‘underdevelopment’ and through an analysis of a variety of development indices what it constitutes in present day society: “In Niger, one doctor must do for 56, 140 people; in Tunisia one doctor for every 8,320 Tunisians”(18). The Marxist concept of inherent inequalities within the international capitalist system un...
The question of why poor countries are poor may seem simple and one dimensional at first glance. However, the answer to this question is actually quite intricate, as many interweaving aspects must be observed. Although it is impossible to explain why many countries remain in poverty within just a few pages, I will attempt to touch upon some of the broader factors. A poor country or a low-income economy is defined as a country with a Gross National Product per capita of $765 dollars or less. In 1995, the World Bank claimed that 49 countries fell into this category. Geography, colonialism, industrialization, resources, education, overpopulation, infrastructure, government, investment, and debt are only a few of the many interrelated factors that have caused many countries to remain in poverty.
There is no proper definition of the word “developing countries”. The reason for this is that many analysts believe that the word “developing countries” does not require a proper definition as they are mostly known as third world countries. Basically, countries that do not have high quantity of economic movement in demand to propose the obligatory resources for the broad majority of the people to disguise slight requirements of use to guarantee good settings of health, food, education, lodging and amenities are known as developing countries (Mowforth, & Munt, 2015). The notion is linked to fairness, circulation of revenue, and identical prospects. Some of the indicators of developing countries are high proportion of redundancy, high proportion
Also, the current irregular financial growth tendency has widened the breach between the rich and poor such as, South Africa and other further developed nations. According to financial forecasts if the existing blueprint of uneven monetary growth persists, one of the poorest nation of the world such as, South Africa will raises to be even poorer will a power plant or not. The second question has made social scientists, policy creators, and worldwide institutions to reorganize ideas about the impact of globalization on nations such as, the above.