shakespeare was unorganized

797 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Shakespeare's influence on English literature

William Shakespeare, An unorganized man
William Shakespeare was a man who wrote wonderful poems & plays that everybody enjoyed. According to his audience he was known as one of the greatest dramatists the world has ever known. He was also the finest man who wrote in the English language, but he was also known as one of the most unorganized dramatists. Every actor would receive last minute lines & changes, the roles of women would be played by boys, & cue acting was also an enormous issue, & the way his audience was organized which led to people thinking of him being chauvinist. While everyone is enjoying all of Shakespeare’s plays, nobody knows all the work he did to make them look great and for the crowd to enjoy. It was even harder work since his work was so unorganized.
Every play has its mistakes, but the writer should try their best so their audience does not notice that they have made a mistake. Shakespeare would assemble last minute changes & even throw in new lines while the play was going on. Therefore, there were mistakes, which the audience may or may not have noticed. It still turned out to be a successful play, but if he wouldn’t have done everything until the last minute, the play could’ve been so much better. Maybe even if they would have had more time to practice & get ready for the big show, there would not have been any mistakes at all.
One of his great admirers, Alex Ryan from the Shakespearian also said” acting was not considered an honorable job”. What he is trying to say is that nobody took acting really serious, maybe because it kept them entertained, despite the fact that it wasn’t even considered an honorable job. It was not any of the actor’s culpability that they made mistakes, but Shakespeare’s. If Sha...

... middle of paper ...

...n, it also very narcissistic of him to do so. Based on this blog that someone from the audience posted, I would think that Shakespeare was also racist because of the way he separated his audience. As a result, of the way he arranged his seating, women would not even go to watch the play. That is how bad the situation was.
As much previously mentioned information, Shakespeare is a famous dramatist that is known for his amazing plays, but he is also one unorganized man. He would change lines at the last minute, he did not have enough actors, he would use men to take over women roles, he used the “cue acting”& “cue scripting” during his plays, & he was also very judgmental with his seating arrangements. To sum up all these things, you now know why in my opinion I think Shakespeare is so unorganized with his work.

Works Cited

http://alexryan8x.tripod.com/theatre.html

Show More
Related

  • How Act 2, Scene 1 of Romeo and Juliet May Have Been Staged

    2215 Words  | 5 Pages

    To commence, in the Elizabethan and Jacobean period, there were many important rules in regards to acting that players had to consider when performing in the Globe theatre. When Shakespeare wrote his plays, he included as many female characters as he did male characters. Nonetheless, the traditions and values of the Renaissance did not allow women to act or become actors, due to the fact that it was considered immoral for a woman to be on stage. At the time, they had no social status other than their association with their husbands or fathers. Moreover, actors were considered to have a low social status, thus it was considered improper and socially unacceptable for a woman to become a performer. Instead of editing all of Shakespeare’s texts to adher...

    Read More

  • Shakespeare's Greatness: Much Ado About Nothing, and King Lear

    1434 Words  | 3 Pages

    The ability of an author to capture the interest of the audience has and will always be an important factor in the art of storytelling and even the expression of research or related material. When an author is able to seize the attention of any partaking of their work, curiosity will develop which will lead to the wonder of what the conclusion my bring about. Not only is it important to snatch the audience’s attention in the beginning, it is necessary to hold it prisoner throughout the tale. Authors do this by having an interesting plot development in which many unexpected details come into play and the course of the story is thrown from the norm and into the conflict. Shakespeare was a master of this art in the work he produced throughout his life and was able to create stories of humor and those of tragedy. For example, his play King Lear is a terrible tragedy in which many awful things take place and the story ends by disastrous means. While in the play Much Ado About Nothing, very little conflict is present and if it is, it is resolved quickly and the play concludes with the joyfulness of marriage nuptials. His ability to develop plot and story in a way in which the audience who love to devour, Shakespeare will in a way immortalize himself, “Shakespeare proved himself to be both the "soul of the age" his works reflected and adorned and the consummate symbol of the artist whose poetic visions transcend their local habitation and become, in some mysterious way, contemporaneous with ‘all time.’” (Andrews) As stated, Shakespeare went beyond his time and created traditions, symbols, sayings, and even stories that people today will remember forever. King Lear and Much Ado About Nothing are each examples of Shakespeare's detailed ...

    Read More

  • The Flawed King in Shakespeare's Henry V

    1567 Words  | 4 Pages

    ... and ambiguity. Shakespeare uses the ironies found in the play so that we will remember his play's limits. It cannot produce an ideal, nor can we as an audience.

    Read More

  • Twelfth Night, As You Like It by William Shakespeare

    1144 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...e comedic relief that actually reflected Shakespeare’s life outside of theater. . Through his art which was dramatic writing, he expressed his thoughts of certain events that happened in his life. Shakespeare expresses his love through his plays such as Twelfth Night, As You Like It, Hamlet and many others through his use of wit, humor and dramatic talent.

    Read More

  • Does Shakespeare matter?

    437 Words  | 1 Pages

    By using just the right combination of words, or by coming up with just the right image, Shakespeare wrote many passages and entire plays that were so powerful, moving, tragic, comedic, and romantic that many are still being memorized and performed today, almost four centuries later. But the greatness of Shakespeare’s ability lies not so much in the basic themes of his works but in the creativity he used to write these stories of love, power, greed, discrimination, hatred, and tragedy.

    Read More

  • Idealism and Truth in an Individual’s Life.

    1068 Words  | 3 Pages

    Shakespeare writes with purpose in this play, he is showing that our ideals are not always what they seem. That in the end the truth wins. As in the case of his main characters in the play they needed to think about their ideals and see what the truth would be before they moved forward with their plans. These characters needed guidance and should have allowed life to happen instead of forcing situations; maybe then they would have survived.

    Read More

  • William Shakespeare's Life in Stratford on Avon

    768 Words  | 2 Pages

    William Shakespeare was a man who lived a very interesting life. Most people may not realize all the hard work he went through, to become so renowned and still be remembered today after hundreds of years. Although some of the happenings in his life are unknown or lost, there are portions that scholars been able to piece together. First, his birth and family are important, as well as his schooling and childhood, and finally his married life.

    Read More

  • William Shakespeare

    545 Words  | 2 Pages

    William Shakespeare was one of the most memorable play writers in history. However, William may have been given false credit. Many people believe that he may not author the plays. In fact, there is much evidence that shows that he did not author the plays.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of A Leader In Shakespeare By William Shakespeare

    991 Words  | 2 Pages

    Each play presents the audience with a unique story, but throughout every play, Shakespeare appears to maintain the belief that a successful leader must have ambition, the ability to see beyond emotions, an awareness of limitations upon their power, a sense of duty to others, loyal friends, and a right to power. Lacking any of these things, a leader may fail; but lacking more than one, failure is nearly certain. Shakespeare seemed to have extremely high standards for leaders, and rightfully so. He recognized that, despite the fact that many aspire to be leaders, very few actually have what it takes. It is likely that he used his plays to communicate this point with the political figures who came to watch them. After all, Shakespeare’s works can be interpreted as cautionary tales, not only for those who wish to gain power, but for those who already possess

    Read More

  • William Shakespeare Research Paper

    1468 Words  | 3 Pages

    He wrote many different works as in plays and poems. “In addition to his thirty-seven plays, Shakespeare wrote an innovative collection of sonnets and two long narrativ...

    Read More

  • Skakespeare and his style of writing

    2363 Words  | 5 Pages

    Shakespeare’s plays are a product of the Elizabethan theatrical context in which they were first performed. A lot of pressure was put on Shakespeare as he wrote his plays because he was not allowed to upset the royal family. His style would have been different than others in those times and a lot more thought has gone into his writing than people listening would think. Usually, the audience take for granted the cleverness and thought of Shakespeare’s writing, however, now we have studied and gone into great detail about Shakespeare’s writing, we can appreciate it more than they did:

    Read More

  • Effects Of Trauma In Hamlet

    853 Words  | 2 Pages

    Shakespeare consists of classic tales, as some would say. He uses such a beautiful language and a strong depiction of his characters, atmosphere, background and even the overall message he tries to send through his productions. Specifically, Hamlet is a very important play because it covers a broad range of themes that we encounter today in the 20th century ranging from love, betrayal, politics, war, death, insanity, espionage and so on. Shakespeare’s work was a form of art and you can get a lot out of his

    Read More

  • Shakespeare’s Language

    1109 Words  | 3 Pages

    The impeccable style and craft of Shakespeare’s writing has always been looked upon with great respect, and it continues to serve as an inspiration to writers and thinkers today even as it did when it was being first performed in London. Shakespeare’s modern audience, however, is far less diverse than the one for which he originally wrote. Due to the antiquity of his language, Shakespeare’s modern readership consists mostly of students and intellectuals, whereas in Shakespeare’s own time, his plays were performed in playhouses packed with everyone from royalty to peasants. Because of this, Shakespeare was forced to write on many different levels, the most sophisticated of which appealed to his more elite audience members, while the more straightforward and often more crude of which appealed to his less educated viewers, and the most universal of which still appeals to us.

    Read More

  • A Compare/Contrast Analysis of Plot Development Between Shakespeare’s Much Ado About Nothing and King Lear

    1066 Words  | 3 Pages

    Shakespeare’s dramatic theatre performances have long endured the test of time. His tales of love and loss, and even some history, make a reader think about events in their own life and what they wish to accomplish in life. Though written for the stage, Shakespeare’s plays have life lessons that readers of the great works can take put into effect in their own lives. Some may say that his plays are out dated, and are something of the past; though they were written in the 1600’s, they have morals and themes that can apply to life. “You've got to contend with versification, poetic license, archaisms, words that we don't even use any more, and grammar and spelling that were in a state of flux when the works were written,” says Pressley in an attempt to explain how to read Shakespeare. Once read and understood, however, one can start to compare and contrast different plays. The ways in which Shakespeare’s two plays King Lear and Much Ado About Nothing are similar out numbers the instances they are different, even though one is a Shakespearian tragedy while the other is a comedy.

    Read More

  • Analysis of William Shakespeare´s Life

    1014 Words  | 3 Pages

    Shakespeare got much recognition in his own time, but in the 17th century, poets and authors began to consider him as the supreme dramatist and poet of all times of the English language. In fact, even today, no one can match his works or perform as well as he did. No other plays have been performed as many times as Shakespeare’s. Several critics of theatre try to focus on the language of Shakespeare and to take out excerpts from the literary text and make it their own resulting in various persons, poets, authors, psychoanalysts, psychologists and philosophers.

    Read More

More about shakespeare was unorganized

Open Document