Behind the Scenes at the Museum and Catcher in the Rye

2484 Words5 Pages

Discuss the view that in - Behind the Scenes at the Museum - and

- Catcher in the Rye - Holden and Ruby can be regarded as unreliable

narrators.

In both “Behind the Scenes at the Museum” and “Catcher in the Rye”

there are obvious signs that Holden and Ruby are troubled and

unreliable characters. The informal conversational tone that Holden

uses is meant to be spontaneous and unrehearsed; so instead of getting

a focused autobiography, we get a scanty account of a few days that

often trail into other stories that are what we use to draw a picture

of Holden. Holden states his intentions from the beginning. He has no

intentions of telling his ‘whole goddam autobiography or anything’ and

states clearly that he doesn’t want to write ‘all that David

Copperfield kind of crap’. This also suggests that Holden has no

concern with what has happened previously, which we later see is not

the case. “Catcher in the Rye” is only spread over a few days unlike

“Behind the Scenes at the Museum” which can be seen as more of a

bildungsroman and appears to be a child’s viewpoint in an adults

voice. This is characterised by the use of vocabulary and descriptions

and also marked by the use of parenthesis. Parenthesis often follows

descriptions such as after the description of the guest bed Ruby adds

in brackets ‘much nicer than the camp bed’ which emphasizes the idea

that it is not just a child speaking. This technique draws the

reader’s attention to the artificiality of this fictional work. This

is unlike “Catcher in the Rye” that in some ways could be regarded as

non-fictional, as Salinger does not emphasize the fact that it is

fiction. However, it could be argued that the style of “Catcher in the

Rye” and the context make it obviously fiction, for example, the

detailed regurgitated conversations which would be not a

characteristic of non-fictional work. However, considering Holden’s

situation and the circumstances it is possible to see him as an

unreliable narrator.

In the first paragraph in “Catcher in the Rye” we know that something

has happened to Holden and he has been hospitalised for quite some

time, suggesting some form of psychological disturbance. However,

although we know that Holden is reflecting on events that lead to his

psychological breakdown, we do not feel that when he is telling the

story it is though the eyes of someone who we cannot trust and whose

judgement may be impaired. Likewise with Ruby, who as an omniscient

character seems most reliable until we are informed of Ruby’s

repression of the death of her twin sister Pearl and Ruby too has

Open Document