America's Flawed Constitution

:: 2 Works Cited
Length: 2321 words (6.6 double-spaced pages)
Rating: Excellent
Open Document
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Text Preview

More ↓

Continue reading...

Open Document

America's Flawed Constitution

Right from the beginning of it’s creation the constitution of the United States has been a shaky document. The very basis for it being there was in fact illegal.

The story of American politics starts with the Declaration of Independence. This document was brilliantly written by Thomas Jefferson and compacted all of the great ideas of enlightenment into one short easy to read paper. The declaration stated all of the ideals the new American nation would strive for. A constitution was needed as a way in which to fulfill those goals. The articles of confederacy were created as that constitution. However, they were weak, because no state wanted to give away any of their powers, and so the articles eventually failed. That is when the modern day constitution was starting to form.

The Articles of Confederacy stated that in order to change any part of the document all thirteen states must agree to the change. Therefor a meeting was called so that they could amend the failing articles. However, representatives from two of the states did not show up. Even though not all states were represented the meeting started and the first vote was to totally throw away the Articles of Confederacy. The constitution wasn’t formed yet and it was already a flawed document. Because not all states were represented when the articles required it, the constitution was an illegal document.

The delegates working on the constitution new that they needed a stronger document, because the articles proved too weak, but it still needed to please all of the states. This was impossible. So what ended up happening was the new ducocument became more and more vague. The only way to create a document that would pass was to make a document which didn’t really solve any problems but make each state believe that there problems would be fixed. This was accomplished by making it so that it was too vague to offend anybody but you could read into it. This made for a document that would be seriously flawed because people would be able to read into it too much. It could not work.

The Constitution of the United States of America was too vague to work. The way the constitution was written it gave power to four parts: the congress, the executive branch, the judicial branch, and the states. Because it was so vague it did not really define which powers went where (with a few exceptions).

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"America's Flawed Constitution." 123HelpMe.com. 21 Sep 2017
    <http://www.123HelpMe.com/view.asp?id=89332>.
Title Length Color Rating  
Essay on The Death Penalty is Flawed and Must Be Abolished - Throughout much of America’s history there has been conflicting thoughts on the matter of taking the life of another in the pursuit of justice. Many have said it is inhumane, wrong, and hypocritical. Others claim it to be justifiable, with roots in Biblical scripture: "an-eye-for-an-eye". The guillotine, electric chair, and lethal injection have one goal, that is to kill its subject. Today, we face the choice to continue or abolish the death penalty. The general consensus hitherto has always been in favor for the death penalty....   [tags: Anti-Death Penalty Essay]
:: 8 Works Cited
1527 words
(4.4 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Essay about Validity of the Constitution - Manifest Destiny was the vigorous force of nationalism that steered the United States onto a path of territorial expansion and war. The ramifications of the Mexican War included a new set of troubling and divisive issues. Through the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, the United States acquired a vast new territories. The ultimate question would be centered upon the status of slavery in these newly organized territories. Ironically, the relentless westward expansion which seemed to draw the nation together inevitably reinstated bitter controversies that haunted the stability of the Union....   [tags: expansion, slavery, political] 1304 words
(3.7 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Essay on The Flawed Electoral College Voting Process - The Flawed Electoral College Voting Process When Americans vote their choice for President, one would assume that these votes would be tabulated and the majority vote would win. But this is not the case at all. The Presidency is ultimately decided by the Electoral College, what William McClenaghan calls “one of the least understood parts of the American political process”(340). McClenaghan also defines the Electoral College as “the body that makes the formal selection of the nation’s President, from what the Framers intended into a `rubber stamp’ for the popular vote in presidential elections”(67)....   [tags: Politics Political Essays]
:: 4 Works Cited
1209 words
(3.5 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Essay on Competing Ideas of the Constitution - On September 15, 1787, the delegates at the Philadelphia convention agreed on a document that would cause great change in America, the Constitution. Some Americans agreed with this idea of having a reformed Articles of Confederation. Others feared that this new document would stifle the growth of the new nation even more than the Articles of Confederation. Certain citizens even feared the effect the Constitution would have on their rights.The decision of whether to ratify this Constitution became a point of between the people of America and caused debates among the Americans....   [tags: philadelphia convention, federal government] 871 words
(2.5 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
The US Constitution: One of the Best Documents Ever Made Essay - There is a constitution in every country to guide the government and to govern the people. With so many struggles facing the United States of America, one thing was for sure, change was needed. A universal law was needed to fix the government and make it more functional. The US Constitution becomes important because it directly states and explains natural born rights and limits the federal government. Both the government and people are bound to obey it. The constitution contains requirements to the powers and duties of government, Americans have been concerned with their rights, the right to practice religion however they wished was one of the primary reasons the first settlers came to Ameri...   [tags: the fourteenth ammendment] 989 words
(2.8 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Essay on Utopia - Constitution of the United States as a Utopian Proposal - The Constitution of the United States as a Utopian Proposal     Few people would take issue with the statement that America faces monumental challenges both to its own well-being as well as to its self-imposed duty to become "a more perfect union". Over the years, many speakers, authors, and dreamers have used the dirty facts of this nation's (and its predecessors') seemingly unrepentant capitalism, paternalism, belligerence, and tendency toward cultural assimilation to declare the entire enterprise bankrupt and to focus, not on where, exactly, the USA went wrong, but instead on what the truly ideal civilization would look like....   [tags: Exploratory Essays Research Papers]
:: 4 Works Cited
1581 words
(4.5 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
Gun Control: Should the Second Amendment of the Constitution be Updated? - According to the F.B.I., 14,369 murders involving firearms took place in the year 2013 within the United States. We as Americans have the right to “bear arms,” however there can be some changes to at least try to minimize these casualties. The 2nd Amendment states “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This may be outdated now that we have a strong military (that is our “well regulated Militia,”) to protect our security, but can a right be scratched off the Constitution because of someone’s interpretation....   [tags: Second Amendment The Right To Bear Arms] 1187 words
(3.4 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Action Plan For America Essay - If you could design a completely new socio-economic form, how would you do it. For the purpose of this thought-experiment, let us assume that all present-day corporations, banks, politicians, lobbyists, and outside parties have no factor in the design; there has been complete collapse in both finance and government. A default on our national debt. All current laws, policies, government programs and departments can be modified or erased however pleased, with exception to the core principles of the democracy such as Constitution, Bill of Rights, Executive/Judicial/Legislative structure, and so forth....   [tags: Economy] 797 words
(2.3 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Essay about Utopia America - The thought of a utopia, where everyone is exactly the same, must appeal to some in need, such as the homeless and the poor. Those people would think that their lives would be better with the transition of our society. However, this is the wrong move to make and we should stay with our current, even if flawed form of government. The first point I have to make is the high cost that we must pay to move to such a point. America, for example has the Constitution to ensure freedoms are preserved. The US Constitution has basic rights and freedoms that are ensured regardless of what may come....   [tags: Government] 1026 words
(2.9 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
American Dream in Let America Be America Again, What is an American, and Dr. King’s I Have a Dream Speech -      What is the American Dream. We all have dreams of different kinds. To some people, the American Dream is having all that is available in this life to meet your needs, wants, and desires. To others, it means having a great job, a wonderful family, and a secure future. And maybe to others the American Dream simply means having the opportunity to prove yourself. No matter what your definition of the American Dream is, we all try hard to achieve this one common goal.      In Crevecouer’s, “What is an American” speech he defines America as a democracy where every man has a say in the government; “We have no princes, for whom we toil, starve, and bleed.” It is clear, through his speech, that...   [tags: Essays on the American Dream] 551 words
(1.6 pages)
Good Essays [preview]

Related Searches




It left too much room to read into and take power away from other branches and into your branch to give yourself more power. The constitution leaves all unmentioned powers to the states, representing the people. This seems like that would be a lot of power, and it would be, except that the other three branches would read into there powers and eventually take almost all powers so that the remaining powers were little and unconsiquencial.

Throughout the history of the constitution the three branches of the government would time and time again expand their powers. Each time taking more powers away from the states and unbalance the system so that the original ideals set would be destroyed. Congress was split into two houses: the senate and the house of representatives. This was one of the ways which the constitution gave an unreal power to the people. The house is the only part of the government which is directly elected by the people. This made the people think they were getting a direct say in the government, but that wasn’t true because everything done in the house would have to go through the senate which was run by the elite. throughout the years congress has constantly expanded their powers through a broad interpretation of the constitution and with every example they have abused the system by unbalancing powers and taking rights away from the people. The biggest thing they used to expand their powers was a small section of the constitution which they expanded to give them any power the saw proper of themselves to have. Article 1 section 8 clause 18 is called the elastic clause. This clause states that congress can make any laws necessary and proper to carry out their powers. This is one of the big reasons the constitution can not work. this clause is just too vague to allow any understanding of what congress’s powers are. Congress would take this clause to the extreme. It does say the can only make laws which would complement their listed powers. However, they took it to mean they could do anything necessary to carry out their "job," which of coarse is anything in their interest, or "in the interest of America." The first major example of their abusement of this clause is the Bank of the United States. In no place does the constitution say that the federal government has any right, or power, to set up a business. Therefor that power would be left for the states. This did not happen, however. Congress, "in their infinite wisdom", deemed it necessary and proper to create a bank to stabilize the economy. Right from the beginning powers were being stripped from the states. It seems the government made for the people was now working against them because the constitution was too vague to protect them. In another instance congress used the necessary and proper clause to pass the Alien and Sedition Act. These laws forbade people to speak out against the government. Doesn’t the first amendment protect peoples right to free speech? But since congress thought it was necessary and proper to have a law like this they were allowed to because that’s the way they interpreted the constitution. Yet another right of the people taken away because the constitution was too vague. Even though the constitutions was supposed to help the government achieve the ideals set by the new nation it turned out to be one of the greatest problems the nation faced, and it was responsible for one of the worst wars in American history, the civil war. This problem first started with the nullification crisis. Because the constitution was so vague that problems erupted over where the powers were to go, the three branches of the federal government began to gain as many powers as they possibly could. This goes against the whole idea of American ideals. The states were the ones who were getting their rights taken from them through broad interpretation of the constitution, when the constitution was supposed to protect them. this cased the states to say that they had the right to declare something the government had done unconstitutional. It was in fact their right because it was a power not mentioned in the constitution and therefor left for the states. It was first brought up in the form of the Virginia and Kentucky resolutions which were in protest to the alien and sedition act. they were denied the right then. It then came up again in the Hayne, Webster debate in regards to a tariff imposed which favored the northern states, and their right was denied then too. The federal government had won out and from then on the federal government would take more powers then ever intended. The constitution had failed. It had let things run wild. It definitely did not fulfill it’s job to try to keep the powers balanced and protect the peoples rights. The broadness of the constitution created problems within the executive branch too. In some cases the constitution was blatantly disregarded. Right from the Washington’s first presidency there was argument about how the constitution would be interpreted. During his presidency two people in his cabinet would change how the constitution would work for the rest of it’s life. Those two people were Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. Alexander Hamilton realized that the constitution was written too vaguely to be taken seriously. His standpoint was that the government could read into it because that was the only way things could get done. Jefferson realized that this would strip the people of their rights and in that way destroy the ideals of America. He believed the constitution should be read strictly. The only problem with this was that it did not specifically say anything. It was a catch twenty two, and that is the whole reason the constitution is a failure. No matter how it is interpreted it can not accomplish anything towards the goals of America. Thomas Jefferson’s way seemed to be the fairest to the people and he eventually became the president. However, this proved the constitution can not work for the people. This is because when he became president he was all for strict interpretation which would protect the peoples rights. However, he realized he had no power to get things done. When he wanted to purchase land he found out there was no way the government could which is a huge flaw because it would greatly help America if it could. He ended up buying the land using a broad interpretation of the constitution and going against his own values. He realized the constitution was too vague to work. This isn’t the only time the executive branch has abused the constitution. When Andrew Jackson was president he totally disregarded it proving it had no real power to keep the branches in check. The first problem that came up was because of the Native Americans. The Cherokee were being forced to move but they thought they did not have to under the laws of the united states, so they took it to court. They eventually won and were granted the right to keep their lands. However President Jackson had other plans. He forced the Cherokee to move against the court ruling. The constitution gave no power to prevent against this. Yet another problem with the vagueness of the constitution. Another problem arose during his presidency. Jackson did not like the bank of the united states because it brought the rich elite closer to the power. The intentions of this were good but he destroyed the bank which had already been proven constitutional. This incident brought up the question of who has the right to say something is unconstitutional, because in one of the constitutions many flaws it does not mention this most important power so everybody was claiming to posses it. The Judicial Branch was in no way excluded from this race for power. Although it had no real power to directly meddle in the other branches it used court cases to set precedents for how things would be conducted in the future and therefor pull power to themselves. The first and most important case they used to get power was Marbury v. Madison. In this historical case Judicial review was formed which gave the court the power to declare an act of congress unconstitutional. Marbury was one of the midnight judges appointed by John Adams as he was leaving office. Adams was trying to pack the courts with people from his political party because they would serve for life. Marbury never got his pares and when the next president found it he refused to deliver it. Marbury sued for his job and it went to the supreme court. The judiciary act would have forced the new president to deliver the papers. The courts agreed. John Marshall, the chief justice, said that Marbury had every right to his job, but that congress had created powers not stated in the constitution. Because of this, Marbury did not get his job. Marshal then went on to set up Judicial review. By doing this, however, the court did something they themselves had just said was unconstitutional. The constitution was supposed to be able to solve these problems but it was too vague. Another court case, McCulloch v. Maryland, gave even more power to congress directly taking it away from the states. In this case the supremacy clause was protected and let congress use a broad interpretation of it to take power. When the second bank of the united states was formed Maryland instituted a tax to try and prohibit the bank from being profitable. They said they had the right to control there local business but the federal government argued the supremacy clause protected them. The Supreme Court decided that the supremacy clause protected things set by the government from the states. The American People were losing power by leaps and bounds. This case made the federal government supreme over the states. The constitution had failed to give the states any power to check the federal government. The main ideal set by the new nation was to keep as much power as possible with the states, and now the states had no power. Time and time again in each branch of the government the constitution was read into and powers were created, proving the constitution was too vague to work. Congress used a couple of open ended clauses to create any power they wanted for themselves. The executive branch proved it was too vague to be able to give any real power, and to that end could not keep the branches in check. And, the courts used their case decision to rob people of their rights. The Constitution was made in a way where it was doomed to fail. It did not really say anything so there was bound to be problems, and it has proved true time and time again.


Bibliography

Hall, Kermit L. The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. New York Oxford University Press, 1992.

Witt, Elder. The Supreme Court A to Z. Congressional Quarterly Inc. Washington DC, 1993.

Bacon, Donald C. The Encyclopedia of the United States Congress. Simon & Schusks. New York, 1995.

Gilbert, Steve. Landmark Decisions of the United States Supreme Court IV. Excellent Books. California, 1994.

Danzer, Gerald A. The Americans. McDougal Littell. Evanston IL, 1998.


Return to 123HelpMe.com