Medical Ethics

  • Length: 1071 words (3.1 double-spaced pages)
  • Rating: Excellent
Open Document

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Text Preview

More ↓

Continue reading...

Open Document

Quaestiones Disputate

#3) Whether it is ethical to keep a person alive if their quality of life is not good and will not improve. In such a case, what is the responsibility of the medical profession?

     The following argument will be made toward the negative, suggesting that it is intrinsically unethical to keep a person alive under certain circumstances The first issue to address is the sub-components of the Quaestione in order to better set the argument in motion as a proof. The Quaestione can be divided up into the following components [whether it is ethical to keep a person alive] , [if their quality of life is not good] , [and will not improve]. , [In such a case, what is the responsibility] , [of the medical profession].
     The first component is, in a general sense, unarguable. Standing alone, the statement of keeping someone alive bears a right to which every human is morally obliged to uphold. They key here is standing alone....Of course society’s code of conduct says that we must preserve life, but this can only be true to a sense until the next issue is incorporated - what if their life is not good?
     What exactly is not good? If we take it from an Aristotelean point of view, we can see that Aristotle claimed that happiness or good living - being happy, healthy, prosperous, and flourishing - is the goal of human life and the basis of all ethical behavior. This eudaimonia that he begins to describe is an end, in a sense that that goal has been reached. If one can no longer reach this ultimate goal or end or is rendered unable to physically or mentally move oneself in that direction (after all, someone else can’t live your life for you to move you to happiness) their life is considered not good. A life rendered not good combined with our ethical obligation to keep someone alive, probably still not enough to grant the individual the ultimate end.
     Now if you listen closely, this is where the turning point begins. Being a teleologist, Aristotle claims that every action is good only in so far that they achieve some good end. If life is not good, and we reach stage three where it will not improve, where is the action of keeping the individual alive reaching a good end. The life is not good, nor will it ever be good - so what is the good end that would result that would warrant this action to be a good action.

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Medical Ethics." 21 Apr 2018
Title Length Color Rating  
Patient Education and Medical Ethics Essay - It is understandable a family member of someone who needs a feeding tube would be scared and apprehensive of this procedure. There are fears associated with placing a feeding tube including malnutrition causing the patient to starve; however, it is the healthcare provider’s responsibility to thoroughly explain the procedure and its benefits to the family. A large aspect of the nursing profession is being an advocate for the patient and explaining to the family that certain procedures are important for the benefit of their health....   [tags: Medical Ethics Essay] 1457 words
(4.2 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Medical Ethics: Patient Wishes vs Doctor Actions Essay - A conflict between a doctor who wants to treat his patient a certain way, and a patient who wants to be treated by the doctor the way she wants. The doctor feels the that certain treatment that the patient wants is dangerous and warns the patient that he will pronounce the patient mentally unstable. This is exactly what happened in the case of Mrs. Jackson and Dr. Lowell. The conflict in this entire article is if weather the doctor can, or can not, accuse his patient mental instability to go about the treatment as he sees fit....   [tags: Medical Ethics]
:: 6 Works Cited
1276 words
(3.6 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Essay about Importance of Dr. Kevorkian case for Medical Ethics - Importance of Dr. Kevorkian case for Medical Ethics The Dr. Kevorkian case is important for medical ethics, because it brings up the issues of physician-assisted suicide and physician-assisted death. Physician-assisted suicide is where the doctor is assisting the patient in suicide, but the patient actually performs the act. Physician-assisted death, also known as euthanasia, is when the doctor does the act to bring about the patient’s death based on the patient’s request. This brings up the limitations of beneficence....   [tags: Medical Ethics Assisted Suicide Essays]
:: 4 Works Cited
707 words
(2 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Ethics in the Medical Field: Sofia's Case Study Essay - Defining the subject of ethics is a complex task, as are the issues faced in an ethical dilemma. Ethics is often referred to as ‘moral philosophy’, which searches for answers to moral questions such as what is justified and virtuous. Other definitions of ethics include meta ethics, which examines the “nature of morality” itself and what we mean by specific moral terms, such as “good and bad”. Normative ethics is concerned with what we ought to do (Banks, 2006. pp. 4-5). This essay will discuss what happened versus what other professionals thought ought to happen in the work involving Sofia, a 15 year female with an incurable heart condition....   [tags: Case Study, Ethics, Medical, solution] 447 words
(1.3 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
What is Medical Ethics? Essays - ... She want to be in the best health, surgery was not an option. Her baby was too small to be born yet ,” meaning too premature.” (Thornton )She wanted to keep treating her cancer but, the doctors said that should wait until 28 weeks.She waited and the doctors she it was too dangerous and they wouldn’t help.So they want to cort.The court made it distion and at time is was very ill. The court order a surguy but the doctor said that if she goes into surgery she might not make it. She refused, but the doctors could not refused the courts orders....   [tags: patients, treatment, cancer] 753 words
(2.2 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Essay on Medical Ethics - Medical Ethics The discussion on Patrick Dismuke’s condition concentrated on his incapability to improve. After reviewing his symptoms and considering possible scenarios resulting from certain kinds of treatment, such as the tube that delivered nutrients into his veins that “broke the barrier between blood and air” and became “a bacteria-laden Trojan horse, opening the door to infection”, we attempted to come to a consensus on what would constitute a quality life, as deliberated among the committee....   [tags: Medicine Health Medical Doctor Essays] 840 words
(2.4 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Conscience, As Related To Medical Ethics Essay - "And always let your conscience be your guide" were the words of Pinnochio's consultant, Jiminy Cricket. Conscience may be defined as a subjective norm of morality, which involves the process of applying and committing to individual knowledge of moral principals and values to specific cases. Even though, according to the Catholic Church, a well-formed conscience should reveal the will of God and be in alignment with church teaching, this is not always the case. Because, with conscience, moral absolutes do not exist, decisions can be made based on purely subjective criteria, which can lead to moral relativism....   [tags: Healthcare Ethics Conscience] 1049 words
(3 pages)
Good Essays [preview]
Medical Ethics Essay - The Affordable Healthcare Act (AHA) in the US, which is similar to other countries’ Universal Healthcare Systems (UHS), has been in the news again recently. From the beginning the AHA has been passionately contested and debated from its introduction on the Senate floor to the challenge in the Supreme Court that it was unconstitutional. The reforms that the AHA started in 2010, such as Health Insurance Companies can not deny someone with a preexisting condition, or the recent troubles of the Health Insurance Marketplace website, AHA is something of a hot button issues that has US citizens deeply divided on....   [tags: Affordable Healthcare Act, Moral Conceptions]
:: 3 Works Cited
996 words
(2.8 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Essay on Medical Ethics - Quaestiones Disputate #3) Whether it is ethical to keep a person alive if their quality of life is not good and will not improve. In such a case, what is the responsibility of the medical profession. The following argument will be made toward the negative, suggesting that it is intrinsically unethical to keep a person alive under certain circumstances The first issue to address is the sub-components of the Quaestione in order to better set the argument in motion as a proof. The Quaestione can be divided up into the following components [whether it is ethical to keep a person alive] , [if their quality of life is not good] , [and will not improve]....   [tags: essays research papers] 1071 words
(3.1 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Essay on Medical Ethics - Physician-assisted suicide refers to the physician acting indirectly in the death of the patient -- providing the means for death. The ethics of PAS is a continually debated topic. The range of arguments in support and opposition of PAS are vast. Justice, compassion, the moral irrelevance of the difference between killing and letting die, individual liberty are many arguments for PAS. The distinction between killing and letting die, sanctity of life, "do no harm" principle of medicine, and the potential for abuse are some of the arguments in favor of making PAS illegal....   [tags: essays research papers] 776 words
(2.2 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]

Related Searches

If we would allow this person to die, the ultimate end would be the end of suffering not only for the individual but also for the end to the prolonged suffering to the loved ones around this person. The action of allowing to die has an end that carries more good that outweighs the bad of keeping alive. Along with this comes the advancement of other’s lives brought on by the end of this bad condition (this will be discussed later). Not only are you ending these other evil feelings but one is also ending the not good situation revolving around the inability for this person to reach an eudaemonic end. If the decision is made to keep this person alive, the “not good” is prolonged with no apparent out weighing if good in the end.
     Since this all came together in such a manner that the action of keeping someone alive in an non-improving, not good state holds more bad than good, then what are we to do and who is responsible for those decisions. This is where the medical profession comes into play. The responsibility of the medical profession is to inform the individuals involved of the condition in which the person in question is in. They are the only ones who are trusted to the point where they can give a description as to whether the person in question is in a state of being in which they are considered not good and not improving. This brings up the issue of how many levels of not good should be addressed in this manner. If a person is in such a primitive state that basic, involuntary, vital functions are the only thing keeping this person from perishing, that is considered not good on the grounds that this person can no longer make their life good, healthy, flourishing, etc. any more. All of the ultimate goals that Aristotle says are the ultimate goals of life.
     Now what about the improving of another’s life, as mentioned before? I was in the rare position of watching my aunt and uncle engage in that informative process and making that decision to remove their son from life support. He was nine years old, involved in a farm accident, and was held without oxygen for 20 min. until the ambulance could get him on a respirator. He was in a vegetative state where only the cortex of his brain was functioning. He lost all primary brain waves with the exception of his primitive, involuntary waves. He could only breath and beat his heart on his own, his eyes would dilate when you shined a flashlight on them but those conditions would not improve the medical profession informed. This is when the lives of others came into play. The suffering of both the parents and the patient could continue for a very long time if they did not do something. If they removed the respirator, his other muscle functions would be too weak to let his chest rise and fall, even though he could breath on his own. His heart was working over-time and was in danger of exhaustion. His body temperature was erratic and controlled only by heat blankets. He would not survive on his own but his organs could.
     His heart, pancreas, liver, and kidneys were able to be used to improve or save the lives of five other people. These people do have a chance at reaching a good life. This is the amount of good that overrides the bad. A Utilitarian point of view would suggest this is what makes an action morally sound.
     Ultimately, the decision must depend on the situation, but if one is to decide that the person can’t reach a good life, then the keeping of the life carries a negative end, something that gains good for no one. The ultimate balance of more good than evil bounds the other way.

Return to