Julius Caesar

  • Length: 1677 words (4.8 double-spaced pages)
  • Rating: Excellent
Open Document

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Text Preview

More ↓

Continue reading...

Open Document

The story of Julius Caesar’s assassination has been told both historically and fictionally. Historical sources focus on the facts of the assassination, while fictionary works focus more on the characters and the drama of the story. Because of the different purposes of the sources, there are many differences between the historical and fictional stories. William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar adds certain details and dramatic elements to make the story more interesting and to make the play more enjoyable. Historical sources such as Roger Bruns’s Caesar and Manuel Komroff’s Julius Caesar present an more accurate account of the events that occurred on and around the Ides of March. There are however, because all of the sources are telling the same story, even more similarities. Reading all of the sources can give a reader an understanding of not only what really happened and why, but also what the people involved were probably like.

The time before Caesar’s death has many differences in how events happened rather than if events happened. Both historical accounts record that Caesar had recently returned from a long military campaign that sent him to the far reaches of the Roman Empire. Shakespeare’s account tells of a recent victory over Pompey but does not say that Caesar returned from a massive campaign. In Komroff’s account, The conspirators had planned for much longer than the other authors recorded. Komroff wrote that the conspirators convinced the Senate to offer Caesar the crown. The conspirators then placed a crown on a statue of Caesar that was quickly torn down by Caesar’s friends. “Then, a few days later, as he was riding through the streets of Rome, a crowd of people who had been led on by the Aristocrats hailed him as King” (Komroff 161-162). The final offer of the crown occurred before a large crowd of Romans, when a crown was placed on Caesar’s head he took it off and said “The Romans have no kings but their gods” (Komroff 162). Caesar refused the title every time because he knew that the second he did, the people would turn against him. Caesar also knew that the conspirators were behind these offers and was not about to play right into their hands. In both Shakespeare’s and Bruns’s works, Mark Antony was the one who offered the crown to Caesar. He did not do it to harm Caesar but out of respect for Caesar.

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Julius Caesar." 123HelpMe.com. 19 Jun 2018
Title Length Color Rating  
Essay about The Events of Shakespeare's Julius Caesar - Julius Caesar’s ambition for power drove the honorable Brutus to think negatively about Julius Caesar’s position of being the King of Rome. Negatively speaking, Julius Caesar’s ways of having most of the power and deciding not to listen to others except the ones that only tell him things he likes to hear, drove the power-hungary conspirators and the honorable Brutus to take his life away. The honorable Brutus shows his love for Rome by committing an act which he seems best fit for his city. Trying everything he can to put Rome in a democracy, the only solution he saw was to join the conspirators to murder Caesar and explain to the people why they committed such an act....   [tags: Shakespeare, Julius Caesar, ] 1409 words
(4 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
Shakespeare's Misrepresentation of Julius Caesar Essay examples - For those who have read the play Julius Caesar, it is easy to speculate that it is an accurate autobiography of Caesar’s last days before he was murdered. Without presented with the historical facts, this assumption remains unchallenged. Yet this is far from the truth, and its playwright William Shakespeare had planned it this way, as we shall view shortly. The many altercations interlinked in this writer’s story include incorrect biological relations between Caesar and the other characters and Caesar’s authentic personality and questionable motives are sugarcoated....   [tags: Julius Caesar Essays]
:: 6 Works Cited
664 words
(1.9 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Love is Beautiful in Julius Caesar Essay - The word love has thousands of meaning but in the end it can mean only one thing. Now over the years the word love had totally lost it’s meaning, but that’s not important to this essay. We are looking back at a time when love was a word that you didn’t throw around. When love still had meaning. When togas were still in style. The word love is repeated in many forms throughout the play Julius Caesar. Unlike the way that we use it today, this word had different meanings. Someone saying it did not usually mean sexual feelings towards another, but it meant friendship in its own sick and twisted way....   [tags: Julius Caesar] 856 words
(2.4 pages)
Good Essays [preview]
Julius Caesar Essay: Decision Making in Julius Caesar - Decision Making in Julius Caesar Making the right decisions is an ongoing struggle for man, because making decisions is never easy, and the wrong decision can lead to endless perils. Decisions must be made when dealing with power, loyalty, and trust. Yet, unlike other decisions, ones that are about these three fields are the most important, due to the risk involved, and because of the consequences that might follow. Power- power is the complete domination of others, and since all men want to dominate those around them, power is valued as one of the most important possessions....   [tags: Julius Caesar Essays] 866 words
(2.5 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Julius Caesar Essay: Loyalty and Justice in Julius Caesar - Loyalty and Justice in Julius Caesar In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, one must read the text closely to track the shifting motivations and loyalties of each character as the play progresses. An important factor that must be kept in mind while reading is the degree of loyalty, in other words, the degree to which characters act out of a motivation to help others. Throughout the play, each character's current degree of loyalty to others is clearly exhibited by words or behavior – this holds true for the characters of Brutus, Cassius, Antony, Portia, and Calpurnia....   [tags: Julius Caesar Essays] 662 words
(1.9 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Excess in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar Essay - Excess in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar Excess makes for a very relevant theme in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare. Being excessively large compared to his followers is a trait that credits Julius Caesar's character. Excessiveness encompasses the leading conspirators. Excessiveness also marks Antony and Octavius in several ways.   Caesar's descriptions as well as his attitude contain excessiveness. Cassius describes Caesar as excessively large in relationship to his followers....   [tags: Julius Caesar Essays] 546 words
(1.6 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Importance of Fidelity in Julius Caesar Essay - Importance of Fidelity in Julius Caesar Humans have always been communal animals. They band together in groups, for social and survival needs. This sense of community brings about the values of dedication and loyalty. The alliances man has created inspires stories and plays about any number of time periods. Many examples of fidelity are illustrated in the characters of Julius Caesar. Antonius appears to be blindly loyal to Caesar. He comes off as a rash supporter in the scene that depicts Antonius viewing Caesar's body....   [tags: Julius Caesar Essays] 578 words
(1.7 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
The calamities of Julius Caesar Essay - The calamities of Julius Caesar Tragedies most often refer back to the actions of men. The play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, provides a good example to how the quote is shown to be accurate." The calamities of tragedy do not simply happen, nor are they sent [by the gods]: they proceed mainly from actions, and those actions of men." This statement is profoundly proven through the past and present actions of the conspirators throughout the play. From the beginning of the play, the reader can identify who will necessarily betray and plot to murder Caesar....   [tags: Julius Caesar Essays] 494 words
(1.4 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Dubious Heros in Julius Caesar Essay - Questionable Heros in Julius Caesar Julius Caesar, a play written by William Shakespeare, had many characters who could have been questioned in terms of their motives and will. Some may have had good intentions, but others were not motivated by their concern for the well-being of the Romans. The aim of this paper is to take a look at why the main people in this tragedy did what they did. Julius Caesar, the center of the big ordeal, is the first logical person to take a look at....   [tags: Julius Caesar Essays] 715 words
(2 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Loyalty in Julius Caesar Essay - A Question of Loyalty in Julius Caesar Loyalty defined means faithfulness to one's friends, country, ideals, etc. What should one do when these loyalties conflict with one another. One would have to choose. A choice that can make or break a man, which I believe broke many men in the play Julius Caesar. One did not know who was friend or foe. One's dearest friends actually your foes. Not possible, is it. Yes, it is. That is the story of Julius Caesar. Julius Caesar, a great, noble man....   [tags: Julius Caesar Essays] 847 words
(2.4 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]

Related Searches

The Number of conspirators is the same in both historical works. Both say that at least sixty men were involved in the conspiracy, most of them senate members. Shakespeare’s work says that only about eight men were part of the conspiracy, probably to cut down on the number of actors for the play. While there are many differences in the time before Caesar’s death, there are just as many similarities.

All three sources agree that Caesar fought and killed Pompey. Some of the senators were alarmed at this because Pompey was a Roman and they questioned Caesar’s honor. Upon Caesar’s return from battle, many celebrations were held. In Bruns’s account, a series of “triumphs” or extravagant celebrations were held in Caesar’s honor, one for each of his triumphs. In Shakespeare’s account, a large celebration was held in Rome in Caesar’s honor. The motive for killing Caesar is similar in all three accounts. The conspirators were afraid that Caesar was “ambitious,” that he wanted to become king. The conspirators feared a monarchy because they did not want a heir to gain the throne, they wanted to maintain a republic where leaders were voted into office. Many of the conspirators did not trust Caesar, “Yet, Caesar still provoked in many deep resentment and distrust” (Bruns 102). Because Caesar was a leader of the people, the conspirators, who were of the aristocratic class, “hoped to regain control of the government” (Komroff 163). All of the sources also agree on when Caesar was killed. He was killed on March 15, the Ides of March.

In the time that Caesar was killed many details are different in the two types of accounts. In the historical account of Komroff, The conspirators crowded around Caesar when he was seated at the head of the Senate. The conspirators engaged in conversation with Caesar, “They talked freely together. Some had favors to ask. Others had stories to tell” (Komroff 166). Then the conspirators began to carry out the fatal stage of their plan.

A scroll was then placed in Caesar’s hand and as he unrolled it and began to read its contents, his toga was suddenly grabbed and torn from his shoulders. He was stabbed in the throat by a dagger.

He rose to his feet with a cry and caught the arm of the one who struck him. Then he was stabbed again by another. He looked around and saw that he was surrounded by a ring of daggers. There was no chance of escape. He lifted the folds of his toga over his head. The daggers struck him from every side (Komroff 166-167).

In Shakespeare’s account a man named Metellus was petitioning Caesar to repeal the banishment of his brother. Caesar refused, saying, “...I am constant as the northern star...” (Shakespeare, 715). The conspirators used this as an excuse to get closer to Caesar. The conspirators came close to Caesar to plead for Metellus’ case, first Brutus and Cassius then the rest of the conspirators joined them as Caesar’s side, all but Casca who was waiting behind Caesar. “Speak, hands, for me!” (Shakespeare 716). This was Casca’s cry as he dealt the first blow to Caesar. The others then set upon Caesar and all but Brutus stabbed Caesar. Caesar tried to fight the conspirators but when he saw Brutus about to stab him he surrendered. “Et tu, Brute? Then fall Caesar!” (Shakespeare 716). The historical account says that the conspirators were already right next to Caesar but the fictionary account says that the conspirators needed an excuse, Metellus, to creep up to Caesar. History records that Caesar was stabbed 23 times, fiction says that Caesar was stabbed “thirty and three” times or 33 times. The differences during Caesar’s death show the different purposes of the author but the similarities show the reader the facts of the story.

In all of the accounts Caesar receives warnings about his death. The same soothsayer who warned him the first time warned him again with the phrase, “Beware of the Ides of March” (Komroff 166). Caesar ignores this warning and heads on to the senate. Artemidorus hands Caesar a scroll with the names of the men in the conspiracy and the details of the plot. Caesar places the scroll in a pile of petitions that he was to review at the senate thinking that it was another petition when it was really a scroll that could have saved his life. “If thou read this, O Caesar, thou mayest live; if not, the Fates with traitors do contrive” (Shakespeare 711). History and Fiction also agree that Caesar fell dead at the base of a statue of Pompey, the one whom Caesar had conquered and killed. The time after Caesar’s death was a dramatic time in Roman history. Because of the already tense situation, few things needed to be changed for Shakespeare’s play.

In Shakespeare’s account Brutus spoke to the Roman people and for a time they were sided with him but in Komroff’s record the people did not side with the conspirators at all, in fact they were against the conspirators. On the night of Caesar’s death, the conspirators met to talk and scheme. Their plan that had seemed so perfect the night before had fallen apart and they had lost the support of the people that they needed so desperately so as not to seem like senseless murderers. In Shakespeare’s story, the conspirators spoke to the people only hours after Caesar’s death and after Antony turned the people against the conspirators they were forced to leave right away and did not even have time to meet that night because they were all either fleeing or dead. There are many more similarities in the time after Caesar’s than differences.

Immediately after Caesar’s death was a time of panic and fear. The senate, after seeing the murder of Caesar, was panicked and they ran from the senate house in fear that they were next. The conspirators surrounded Caesar’s body and raised their hands in victory proclaiming that “Liberty is now restored” (Komroff 167). In both accounts the conspirators address the Roman people to try to gain their support and approval. When Mark Antony speaks to the people he rallies them against the conspirators. He shows the people Caesar’s body and Shakespeare wrote that Antony even pointed out the place that each of the conspirators stabbed Caesar to give the people a picture of the murder. Antony read Caesar’s will to the people to make the people feel personally involved in the situation. The people were so riled by Antony that they began to march through the streets of Rome calling for the death of the conspirators. Shakespeare wrote that the mob even killed a man who had the same name as one of the conspirators. This goes to show how angry the people were and how hungry they were for revenge. In all of the accounts the conspirators were hunted down and killed, thus avenging the murder of Julius Caesar.

When Shakespeare presented the story of Julius Caesar’s death he made it entertaining because, as a playwright, it was his job to present a story in an entertaining fashion. He added elements that may or may not have had any part in what actually happened. Historical authors like Komroff and Bruns have to make their works historically accurate to give readers the real story. They do not have to make history sound exciting by adding elements or by developing characters. Because these authors had different purposes so they wrote the story from different perspectives. This causes differences in the story’s development and the effect it leaves on a reader or viewer.

Return to 123HelpMe.com