My Account

Habits That Hinder Thinking

:: 1 Works Cited
Length: 818 words (2.3 double-spaced pages)
Rating: Excellent
Open Document
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Text Preview

John and Julie, your two best friends, have just read an article about the death penalty. It explains the reasons why death by lethal injection is a legitimate punishment for certain crimes.
     As Julie reads the article, she strongly agrees with what the author has to say. “An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth,” she imagines. Without examining the ideas that are involved, she’s
satisfied with everything the article says because, “It’s only fair.”
     John, on the other hand, is deeply offended before he’s even finished reading the article. He leans heavily on the feeling that God has the only power to decide someone’s fate, not man. “It’s not right to interfere with another person’s existence on Earth,” he thinks to himself as he keeps reading.
     What Julie and John don’t know is that they’ve both used some habits that hinder thinking to come up with their opinions. They both had strong initial feelings about the death penalty. And
they both finished with those same feelings because they were the most satisfying. But Julie and John failed to try to learn about their opposing opinion. Without even realizing it, they both
became victims of thobbing.
      Henshaw Ward termed thobbing for considering and evaluating ideas. “The term combines the th from thinking, the o from opinion, and the b from believing” (qtd. in Ruggiero 53). You can be aware of when you are thobbing by paying close attention to your initial opinions, especially the ones that are very strong.
     There are many habits that can hinder one’s thinking, causing their mind to fall victim to thobbing. Julie and John both used conformity and resistance to change, and rationalizing habits
when coming up with an opinion about the death penalty article.
     In The Art of Thinking, Ruggiero states that “harmful conformity is what we do instead of thinking in order to belong to a group or to avoid the risk of being different. Such conformity is
an act of cowardice, a sacrifice of indepedence for a lesser good(49).
     Julie and John may have been conforming when they developed their opinions about the article on the death penalty. They had probably dealt with the argument before and were exposed
to other people’s opinions. Then when they came across this article, they were most satisfied with the belief they were familiar with. They remembered the other people’s attitudes and conformed.
     John belongs to a church where he practices his belief in Christianity. At his church last
Sunday, his pastor preached about how death is not a punishment that can be handled and administered by people. John listened to the message and accepted it very comfortably. When he
later read the article, he resisted to understand the information it gave that would change his opinion. This is called resistance to change.
     One of the reasons why people resist to change is fear. When someone doesn’t want to change, they are afraid of the risk of ending up in a less comfortable situation than their current
one. Julie had lived in Washington since she was born. When a college in California accepted her, she turned it down and decided to go to a local college. She was apprehensive of the risks of not liking a new environment, and not fitting in. Julie resisted to change.
     Another habit that can interfere with someone’s thinking is rationalizing. Honest reasoning can be easily confused with rationalizing sometimes. An easy way to tell the difference is to
examine the purpose in how you come up with your opinion. If you analyze the argument before you make up your mind, you are reasoning. But if you make up your mind first, then select information from the argument that supports your decision, you are rationalizing.
     Julie and John both had decided what they were going to believe as soon as they knew what the argument was about. Then they selected evidence from the article to justify their opinion.
     Metacognition, or thinking about your thinking, is a good habit to pick up because it can lessen your chance of becoming a victim of thobbing. Recognize your initial strong feelings you
get when faced with an argument. Instead of going along with them and believing they are right, be open minded to the evidence that lay ahead. After gathering all the information, use honest reasoning to make up your mind.
     Thobbing is using habits that hinder thinking instead of actually thinking. Like John and Julie, who both read the article on the death penalty and thobbed instead of thought, we all fall
into using these habits. Instead of using conformity, resistance to change, or rationalizing next time you are faced with an argument, reason your ideas and evidence. This will save you from being a victim to thobbing.
Works Cited
Ruggiero, Vincent Ryan. The Art of Thinking: A Guide to Critical and Creative Thought. 1998
Addision-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc.

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Habits That Hinder Thinking." 06 Dec 2016

Related Searches

Important Note: If you'd like to save a copy of the paper on your computer, you can COPY and PASTE it into your word processor. Please, follow these steps to do that in Windows:

1. Select the text of the paper with the mouse and press Ctrl+C.
2. Open your word processor and press Ctrl+V.

Company's Liability (the "Web Site") is produced by the "Company". The contents of this Web Site, such as text, graphics, images, audio, video and all other material ("Material"), are protected by copyright under both United States and foreign laws. The Company makes no representations about the accuracy, reliability, completeness, or timeliness of the Material or about the results to be obtained from using the Material. You expressly agree that any use of the Material is entirely at your own risk. Most of the Material on the Web Site is provided and maintained by third parties. This third party Material may not be screened by the Company prior to its inclusion on the Web Site. You expressly agree that the Company is not liable or responsible for any defamatory, offensive, or illegal conduct of other subscribers or third parties.

The Materials are provided on an as-is basis without warranty express or implied. The Company and its suppliers and affiliates disclaim all warranties, including the warranty of non-infringement of proprietary or third party rights, and the warranty of fitness for a particular purpose. The Company and its suppliers make no warranties as to the accuracy, reliability, completeness, or timeliness of the material, services, text, graphics and links.

For a complete statement of the Terms of Service, please see our website. By obtaining these materials you agree to abide by the terms herein, by our Terms of Service as posted on the website and any and all alterations, revisions and amendments thereto.

Return to