• Length: 661 words (1.9 double-spaced pages)
  • Rating: Excellent
Open Document

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Text Preview

More ↓

Continue reading...

Open Document


     Most Americans were very suspicious of government, but the Anti-

Federalist was really mistrustful of the government in general and strong

national government. This mistrust was the basis of their opposition to the

constitution. They feared it had created a government the people could not

control. Many distinguished Americans were Anti-Federalists. Leaders

included George Mason and Elbridge Gerry. Both attended the Philadelphia

Convention but had refused to sign the constitution.

     The Anti-Federalist argued that the Constitution had many flaws.

The thought that it should have been developed in meetings whose

proceedings was open to the public. And it would undermine a republican

form of government. It gave too much power to the national government at

the expense of the powers of state governments. It gave too much power to

the executive branch of the national government at the expense of the other

branches. It gave too much power because of the “necessary and proper

clause.” It did not adequately separate the powers of the executive and

legislative branches. In addition, it allowed the national government to keep

an army during peacetime. And also it did not include a bill of rights.

     They feared that because of these flaws in the Constitution, the new

national government would be a threat to their national rights. They also

thought that the constitution had been developed by an elite and privileged

group to create a national government for the purpose of serving its own

selfish interest. They thought the only safe government that if it had a local

and closely linked with the will of the people. And controlled by the people,

by such means as we have yearly elections and replacing peopled in key

positions often.

     The Federalist knew that many members of Congress and the state

governments were against the new Constitution, largely because it reduced

their powers. So the federalist decided not to ask the Congress or state

governments to approve the Constitution, even though they were expected to

do so.

     Today, now that the Constitution has worked successfully for 200

years, it would be easy to ignore the anti-federalist of 1787 and 1788 as an

unimportant historical force, a collection of no constructive reactionaries

and cranks. Actually, the anti-federalist may well have represented the

views of the majority of the Americans, whose reasons for preferring the old

Articles of Confederation were firmly within the democratic tradition.

     Among the anti-federalist were fiery old patriot leaders who feared

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Anti-Federalist." 24 May 2018
Title Length Color Rating  
The Similarities and Differences between the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers - The Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers played a major role in US History. They dealt with many problems in politics. The papers were made after the Revolutionary war. People started to worry that the government would not last under the Articles of Confederation. Without having a backup plan just yet, some delegates met up and created the Constitution. The constitution had to be ratified before it became the rule of all the land. The Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers discuss whether the constitution should be approved or not....   [tags: US post-revolution history, ] 882 words
(2.5 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist Essay - Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist The road to accepting the Constitution of the United States was neither easy nor predetermined. In fact during and after its drafting a wide-ranging debate was held between those who supported the Constitution, the Federalists, and those who were against it, the Anti-Federalists. The basis of this debate regarded the kind of government the Constitution was proposing, a centralized republic. Included in the debate over a centralized government were issues concerning the affect the Constitution would have on state power, the power of the different branches of government that the Constitution would create, and the issue of a standing army....   [tags: Papers] 852 words
(2.4 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
The Progression From The Articles of Confederation to The Constitution As a Result of Anti-Federalist, and Federalist Debate - Looking back in history (1781-1787) at the debate over ratification of the Constitution we can see that the making of the constitution was a long drawn out battle between the federalists and the Anti-Federalists. There were concerns as to the inherent weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, such as the lack of action during Shay’s Rebellion, the issue over taxation, as well as the problematic consensus required by all states to change any one of the Articles. There was a fear that if given too much power the executive leader would become like the king they had just fought a revolution to free themselves from....   [tags: American Constitution]
:: 3 Works Cited
3731 words
(10.7 pages)
Research Papers [preview]
Federalist Vs Anti-Federalist Essay - John Adams stated that “Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it.” Federalists believed this, and fought verbal and written battles against the Anti-Federalists, who disagreed with John Adams....   [tags: US History Constitution] 912 words
(2.6 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
The Ratification of the United States Constitution Essay - During 1787 and 1788 there were quite a few debates over the ratification of the United States Constitution. The issues disputed are outlined and explored in the Federalist Papers, an assortment of letters and essays, often published under pseudonyms, which emerged in a variety of publications after the Constitution was presented to the public. Those who supported the Constitution were Federalists, and those who opposed were Anti-Federalists. Their deliberations concerned several main issues. Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, James Madison, and other supporters of the Constitution argued in support of the federalist requirements that reserved powers to the states as well as the nationalist el...   [tags: anti-federalists, federalist paper] 961 words
(2.7 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Anti-Federalist Essay - Most Americans were very suspicious of government, but the Anti- Federalist was really mistrustful of the government in general and strong national government. This mistrust was the basis of their opposition to the constitution. They feared it had created a government the people could not control. Many distinguished Americans were Anti-Federalists. Leaders included George Mason and Elbridge Gerry. Both attended the Philadelphia Convention but had refused to sign the constitution....   [tags: essays research papers] 661 words
(1.9 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
James Madison and the Federalist Papers - On September 17, 1787, the Philadelphia Convention sent their new constitution to the states for ratification. The Federalists highly approved of the Constitution because it allowed for a more central and powerful government that was previously undermined under the Articles of Confederation. The Anti-Federalists, however, didn’t want a powerful central government, but, instead, powerful state governments; in response to the Constitution, many Anti-Federalists began writing essays and creating pamphlets as a means of arguing against it....   [tags: Federalist Papers] 739 words
(2.1 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
The Federalist Essay - In order to ascertain the cultural and literary significance of the “The Federalist”, an understanding of some small but significant United States history is in order. In 1787 the Constitutional Convention was to meet and determine the next pivotal step for the United States of America. What will be the governing body of this new republic and how should it strike forward on this great adventure. A team of framers set out to write what would become one the greatest documents in modern history. “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Bl...   [tags: Cultural, Literary Significance]
:: 7 Works Cited
980 words
(2.8 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Essay about Federalist - Federalist The Constitution came out to a world full of criticism. To put to sleep many of the objections that the critics had to the Constitution a number of those in favor of it such as Hamilton, Madison and John Jay wrote the Federalist. While there were many arguments for the Constitution, there were two that played a major part in American life. The first major argument was that the powers of the government came directly or indirectly from the common people. The second argument stated that to keep the government in check there is a series of checks and balances that will not let one branch of government gain too much control....   [tags: Papers] 1180 words
(3.4 pages)
Good Essays [preview]
Federalist Essay - After winning their independence in the American Revolution, America's leaders were hesitant to create a strong centralized government in fear that it would only replace King George III's tyranny. As a result, the first constitution, the Articles of Confederation, gave the national government hardly any power over the states, and created chaos within the nation. Because of the Articles' inefficiency, a new document called the Constitution was drafted. The Constitution created a more centralized government with the separation of powers among executive, legislative, and judicial branches....   [tags: Political Science Politics] 1448 words
(4.1 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]

Related Searches

that centralized power was an invitation to tyranny. Among those who

preferred the Articles was Samuel Adams--still padding like an old cat

around the streets of Boston on the lookout for threats to liberty, still

dressing in the fashions of 1776? Adams opposed the new government until

Massachusetts Federalist, needing his support, agreed to press for a national

bill of rights.

     In Virginia, none other than Patrick Henry battled James Madison

around the state. Some of Henry’s arguments against the Constitution were

foolish. At one point he concluded that the Constitution was an invitation to

the pope to set up his court in the U.S.

     But Henry and other Anti-federalist also argued that free republican

institutions could survive only in small countries such as Switzerland and

ancient Greece, and they had the weight of historical evidence on their side.

When Rome, the greatest republic of them all, grew large, it became

despotic. Would the same thing happen to Rhode Island and Virginia and

Georgia and other small independent states when they were subsumed into a

centralized U.S.?

     Answering this objection to the Constitution was the Federalists’

most difficult task. Madison, Hamilton, and John Jay of New York took it

upon themselves to do so in 85 essays under the name The Federalist Papers

still a basic textbook of political philosophy. they argued that a powerful

U.S. would also guarantee liberty. these ingenious essays, however, were

less important to the triumph of the Federalist than their agreement to add a

bill of rights to their Constitution.

Return to