Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
case studies of oligopoly
effects of oligopoly
strength and weaknesses of oligopoly
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: case studies of oligopoly
Monopoly
The Monopoly
a) Using Australian examples describe the characteristics of the two of the following forms: Monopoly Oligopoly
The main characteristics of an oligopoly are:
· The market is dominated by only a few companies, which are relatively large.
· The production of identical products which are similar.
· There are significant barriers to entry.
· The interdependence of production decisions within the market.
An Oligopoly market exists in which a small number of firms dominate the supply to an entire market. Each firm producers a very similar product. In Australia the oligopoly is the major market form. It is because Australia is so small market located far from overseas markets and this thus requires producers to be larger, so they are more competitive. There are hundreds of examples of oligopolistic industries, e.g. cars (Holden), breakfast cereals (Kellogs)
This market form does not only depend on the larger producers, but the recognition of their interdependence, the action of one producer will affect the actions of others and each oligopoly firm watches their rivals closely. Oligopolies compete fiercely for market share, therefore the competition for existing or new consumes is intense, as each producers products are very similar. As a result oligopolists have little influence over price. For example Shells petrol is very similar to Mobil petrol, therefore these two companies watch each other closely.
Oligopoly firms attempt to make their products different in the eyes of consumers. This can be achieved in many different ways. Firstly by providing quality improvements in goods or services such as electrical sound equipment, secondly by different packaging or wrapping, thirdly by bonus offers or prizes on purchase, for example Just Jeans offering free sunglasses. The more product differentiation among oligopoly firms, there is a more chance of each firm has being independent from its rivals when setting price or output.
It is hard for new firms with a small market share to enter the oligopoly market and produce enough to make the product cheap for consumers to buy. The small amount of large firms can often produce large amounts of quantity to provide for all consumers to purchase. It is difficult for new firms to win market shares form existing producers, particularly if those firms have large advertising budgets, licenses, design patents or restrict access to raw materials on one way or another.
An oligopoly usually consists of two to ten companies that are selling products with little to no differentiation. While the companies do hold some control over the price of the product they are selling, it is mostly dependent of the pricing of the competitors’ product. The companies in an oligopoly rely heavily on advertising and marketing their products to appeal to consumers. This is because all the companies in the oligopoly have to try to stay a step ahead of their competitors in order to appeal to consumers (S, S.). An example of an oligopoly is the cell phone industry. Verizon, AT&T, Sprint, and T-Mobile are the four dominating competitors in the market. These four companies are the only ones offering a reliable plan, at a (not so) decent price. They are constantly advertising, it seems as if every other commercial and ad you see is for one cell phone company or another, for one outrageously expensive plan or another. This goes to show that just because there is some semblance of competition between companies in a market, does not mean that consumers will be receiving a fair price on a product or
Oligopolists are drawn in two different directions, either to compete with each other or to collude with each other. If they collude, they end up acting as monopoly and thereby maximising the industry's profits. However they are often tempted to compete with each other inorder to gain a bigger share of the profit of the industry.
It is a well-known fact that every firm wants to be successful in its business. Sometimes it is difficult to decide what kind of actions to take in order to achieve it. Especially, it is hard on oligopoly market because this is one of the most complicated market structures. Oligopoly includes many models and theories such as duopoly where are just two producers and which pricing decisions remind monopoly, kinked demand curve, which decreases economic profit, and cartel, which brings economic profit just for the short-run. However, to be a successful oligopolistic firm in the long run, managers should include in the planning process such economic theories and models as producer interdependence, the prisoner’s dilemma, price leadership, nonprice adjustments, and correct using of barriers to entry.
They started the company by designing a robot for space exploration in 1991. Over the next few years they worked on developing robots to eliminate mines in surf zones. That’s when DARPA started to notice them. 2 years later, 1998, they had the PackBot. Straight from the iRobot site, the PackBot is a modular, adaptable, and expandable robot. It can perform tasks like bomb disposal, recon, and surveillance. That sparked a big advancement for iRobot. They used the PackBot in the World Trade Center attack on September 11th, 2001. iRobot used this as steps to make more robots for uses with the military. The lightweight 310 SUGV was made for bomb disposal and ordnance disposal, vehicle inspections, explosive detection, building clearing, and much more. It weighs 30 pounds and can easily be carried by a soldier. Controlled by a small tablet, it is extremely versatile. You can just set it down and use it. Their next military vehicle is the 710 Kobra. This beast can lift up to 330 pounds. Like the SUGV, it can be used for explosives and vehicle inspection. But being such a beast, it can be used to remove debris. Its arm can reach up to eleven feet. It’s easily maneuverable and can even climb stairs. Also being controlled by a tablet, it can be driven up in a vehicle and deployed easily. Their final bot is small, but not to be misunderestimated. The 110
There are many industries. Economist group them into four market models: 1) pure competition which involves a very large number of firms producing a standardized producer. New firms may enter very easily. 2) Pure monopoly is a market structure in which one firm is the sole seller a product or service like a local electric company. Entry of additional firms is blocked so that one firm is the industry. 3)Monopolistic competition is characterized by a relatively large number of sellers producing differentiated product. 4)Oligopoly involves only a few sellers; this “fewness” means that each firm is affected by the decisions of rival and must take these decisions into account in determining its own price and output. Pure competition assumes that firms and resources are mobile among different kinds of industries.
Robotic technology has enabled the US military to use autonomous robots (or unmanned systems, UMS) in modern warfare. In the war with Iraq, the US military sent 12000 ground robots at the end of 2008 (P. W. Singer). One of the most popular robots used in Iraq is the iRobot Packbot, an unmanned ground vehicle, which is capable of detecting and destroying improvised explosive devices. Exploiting robots in warfare can save lives of many human soldiers. Moreover, robots are faster, have longer endurance, high precision and immunity to chemical and biological weapons (Ronald Arkin).In the National Defense Act of 2001 the U.S. Congress, obviously impressed by the potential of robots saving lives on the battlefield, established the requirement for one-third of the ground vehicles and one-third of the deep-strike aircraft in the military to be robotic within the decade. Consequently, in the “Fiscal Year 2009-2034 Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap” of the office of the secretary of defense showed the four categories that will be focused on are reconnaissance and surveillance, target identification and designation, counter-mine and explosive ordnance disposal, and chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear detection (Stew Magnuson).
Along these lines, the state of perfect competition that items must be indistinguishable from firm to firm is not met. The restaurant, apparel and shoe commercial ventures all display monopolistic competition. Firms inside those businesses endeavors to cut out their own particular sub industries by offering products or services not copied by their rivals. From numerous points of view, monopolistic competition is nearer than oligopoly to perfect competition. Boundaries to section and exit are lower, singular firms have less control over business sector costs and purchasers, generally, are learned about the contrasts between firm’s products. Monopoly and oligopoly are counterpoints to monopoly and oligopoly. Rather than being comprised of numerous purchasers and couple of buyers. These extraordinary markets have numerous dealers however couple of purchasers. The resistance business in the U.S. constitutes a monopoly; numerous organizations make products and services and endeavors to offer them to a particular purchaser, the U.S. military. A case of an oligopoly is the tobacco
Price competition among rivals is close to nil, industry participants are very competitive when it comes to product differentiation. Product offerings to satisfy consumer demands include a variety of coffee, juices, muffins, bagels, cookies, cream cheese sandwiches, soups and other miscellaneous items.
An oligopolistic market has a small number of sellers dominating market share and therefore barriers to entry are high. These sellers are highly competitive and do not act independently of each other. Access to information is limited so sellers can only speculate of their competitor’s actions. Sellers will take advantage of competitor’s price changes in order to increase market share.
An oligopoly is defined as "a market structure in which only a few sellers offer similar or identical products" (Gans, King and Mankiw 1999, pp.-334). Since there are only a few sellers, the actions of any one firm in an oligopolistic market can have a large impact on the profits of all the other firms. Due to this, all the firms in an oligopolistic market are interdependent on one another. This relationship between the few sellers is what differentiates oligopolies from perfect competition and monopolies. Although firms in oligopolies have competitors, they do not face so much competition that they are price takers (as in perfect competition). Hence, they retain substantial control over the price they charge for their goods (characteristic of monopolies).
Markets have four different structures which need different "attitudes" from the suppliers in order to enter, compete and effectively gain share in the market. When competing, one can be in a perfect competition, in a monopolistic competition an oligopoly or a monopoly [1]. Each of these structures ensures different situations in regards to competition from a perfect competition where firms compete all being equal in terms of threats and opportunities, in terms of the homogeneity of the products sold, ensuring that every competitor has the same chance to get a share of the market, to the other end of the scale where we have monopolies whereby one company alone dominates the whole market not allowing any other company to enter the market selling the product (or service) at its price.
Foreign policy with foreign nations that host the Starbucks brand. Import and export tax is an expenditure that may and can become costly and profits can be lost. Other companies like McDonalds, Dunkin Donuts, and the Coffee Beanery provide consumers with an ambient environment and some specialty coffee flavors. Proximity may be the only thing required for the consumer to select the services of the rival coffee dispensing businesses.
According to Sloman (2013), perfect competition is the most extreme market structure. The conditions include there being many firms, freedom of entry into the industry and the firm producing homogeneous products; each frim selling identical products e.g. milk (Griffiths,
The four market structures: perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly entails various characteristics that exemplify the level of competition within the market. These distinct features include having a number of sellers, producing a homogeneous or differentiated goods or services, pricing power, a level of competition, barriers to entering or exit the markets, efficiency, and profits. Due to the high profit and revenue some firms face within the various market structure, barriers to entry are put in place to restrict new competitors from entering. Natural, artificial, and governmental barriers play a vital role in firms ability to stay in a market, be productive, efficient, and competitive. Firms reaction to price changes, the government’s ability to create a price, and the influence of international trade on the market structures, are essential factors that economist evaluate the various market structures. Overall, the competition between market structures may not always result in the same outcome, due to the behavior and interaction between consumer’s and buyers, but in the end, both the buyer’s and seller’s are needs are
The type of firm we are going to investigate in this assignment is an oligopolistic firm. The essence of an oligopolistic market is that here are only a few sellers. As a result, the actions of any one seller in the market can have a large impact on the profits of all the other sellers. Oligopolistic firms are interdependent in a way that competitive firms are not. The company we chose to study is Petronas.