Freedom of Choice in Shakespeare's King Lear

:: 10 Works Cited
Length: 2343 words (6.7 double-spaced pages)
Rating: Excellent
Open Document

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Text Preview

More ↓

Continue reading...

Open Document


 
    Humans, like all creatures on the earth, have the privilege of the freedom of choice.  There are two broad ranges of factors that affect the decisions a person makes.  The first factor that affects decision making is internal and includes a person's character and intellect.  The second factor is external such as environment and interaction with other people. Naturally, each decision a person makes results in a repercussion of some degree, usually either helpful or hindering, and rarely inconsequential. The concept of justice is based on the fact that decisions are always followed by consequences.  It strictly adheres to the rewarding of good deeds and the punishment of evil.  King Lear, a play by William Shakespeare, is a grave tragedy that is a prime example of the Elizabethan conception of justice.  Lear's kingdom turns to chaos because of a break in the "Great Chain of Being" and restores to order when justice prevails. Its tragic labelling stems from the prevalence of death the just punishment for many of its characters.  The deaths of Lear, Goneril, and Edmund are prime examples of justice prevailing for evil, and in Lear's case unnatural, acts.

    Lear's ultimate fate is death.  His early demise is a direct result of

breaching the "Great Chain of Being" which states that no mortal will

abandon his position in the hierarchy of ranking set by God.  Lear's

intention of abdicating his throne is apparent from the outset and is seen

in the following speech spoken during the opening scene of the play:

            . . . 'tis our fast intent

            To shake all cares and business from our age,

            Conferring them on younger strengths while we

            Unburdened crawl toward death. . .1

 

    Evidently the splitting of Lear's kingdom and abdication of his throne

is not an act of necessity, but an act toward easing the remainder of his

life.  Lear's disruption of the "Great Chain of Being" is in an unnatural

fashion because the abdication of his kingship is without dire or mortal

cause.  The method of passing down his land to his heirs is also unnatural,

as seen in the following excerpts:

            . . . Know that we have divided

            In three our kingdom. . .

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Freedom of Choice in Shakespeare's King Lear." 123HelpMe.com. 22 Feb 2018
    <http://www.123HelpMe.com/view.asp?id=4108>.
Title Length Color Rating  
Imprisonment in Shakespeare's King Lear Essay - Imprisonment in King Lear      In the play King Lear, by William Shakespeare, the idea of imprisonment is fundamental to the plot and central ideas. All characters are imprisoned, whether it is physically, socially or psychologically. Each character suffers 'imprisonment' in some form.   King Lear is one of the more caged characters of the play, he suffers both social and psychological incarceration and this is one the chief reasons for his descent into mental hell and inevitable downfall....   [tags: King Lear essays]
:: 4 Works Cited
1430 words
(4.1 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
The Rise of Evil in King Lear Essay - King Lear:  The Rise of Evil                   King Lear, the principal character in Shakespeare’s play of the same name, is a dominating imperious king. Though he takes initiative to disinherit his youngest daughter and exile his faithful friend, there is not in him the capacity for conscious and intentioned evil that is prevalent in his two elder daughters as well as in Cornwall, Edmund and Oswald. Nevertheless, there is a force in Lear that releases a movement of destruction in which evil does rise and momentarily take hold on the course of events....   [tags: King Lear essays]
:: 5 Works Cited
2307 words
(6.6 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
King Lear as a Commentary on Greed Essay - King Lear as a Commentary on Greed    In Chapter 4 of a book titled Escape from Freedom, the famous American psychologist Erich Fromm wrote that "Greed is a bottomless pit which exhausts the person in an endless effort to satisfy the need without ever reaching satisfaction" (Fromm 98).  Fromm realized that avarice is one of the most powerful emotions that a person can feel, but, by its very nature, is an emotion or driving force that can never be satisfied.  For, once someone obtains a certain goal, that person is not satisfied and continues to strive for more and more until that quest leads to their ultimate destruction.  For this reason, authors have embraced the idea of greed in the c...   [tags: King Lear essays]
:: 4 Works Cited
1114 words
(3.2 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Essay on William Shakespeare's King Lear - Although referred to as a distinct philosophy, it seems nearly impossible to find an exact definition for the term “existentialism.” This is primarily true because existentialist thinkers, such as Friedrich Nietzchse, Søren Kierkegaard, and Fjodor Dostoyevsky, never agree on what the definition of existentialism is or its terms. However, according to a definition provided by St. Aslem College, existentialist thought can be defined as being “thrown into existence first without a predetermined nature and only later do we construct our nature or essence through our actions (Banach).” This means several things....   [tags: existencialism, character analysis] 699 words
(2 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Free King Lear Essays: King Lear - King Lear In King Lear, the unnatural elements seem to always dominate the natural elements throughout the play.  There exists a reversal of order in the play where the evil prosper in the downfall of the good, and where man's life is meaningless and arbitrary.  King Lear, the tragic hero, dies in the end despite the torment and agony he had to endure to regenerate and repent.  But it is the worthless destruction of countless other lives because of Lear's own personal tragedy that supports the view of the brutality and the meaningless of man's life in the play....   [tags: free essay writer] 737 words
(2.1 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Love, Friendship, Loyalty in William Shakespeare's Midsummer Night's Dream and King Lear - In William Shakespeare’s (1564-1616) attempt to explore themes of love, friendship and loyalty in his plays, A Midsummer Night’s Dream (1600) and King Lear (1603-1606), there is distinct and constant portrayal of these themes classified of inconsistencies. It is crucial to understand that the historical context of Shakespeare’s writing is important in grasping a true understanding of the inconsistencies that exists in love, friendship and loyalty. Writing during the time of the renaissance, Shakespeare’s critical writing of such themes is of great importance in understanding the new socio-political framework of the early modern English times....   [tags: paternal, patriarchs, relations]
:: 2 Works Cited
2672 words
(7.6 pages)
Term Papers [preview]
Comparing Shakespeare's King Lear with Henrick Ibsen's Doll House Essay - Women in most cultures have been designated as second to men and in some instances, considered below male children as well. With the passage of time women gained respect and the right for equality. Although gender discrimination remains, a lot of progress has been achieved. Literature is a one of the facets of the human race that reflects the culture change of people. William Shakespeare’s King Lear portrays the patriarchal system of the Renaissance era, which leaves women completely dependent on the male head of household....   [tags: story, gender subordination analysis]
:: 3 Works Cited
1128 words
(3.2 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
An Examination of the Significance of the Fool in King Lear Essay - An Examination of the Significance of the Fool in King Lear A Fool is used in plays as a professional jester or clown whose function it was to amuse the king and his followers by his jokes and witty remarks. The Fool enjoyed the freedom to speak on any subject and to comment on persons and events without any restraint. The Fool’s function was purely to provide entertainment and to amuse people. Shakespeare’s objective in introducing the fool in King Lear is to provide comic relief in the play where the events are very tragic and oppressing....   [tags: Papers] 2150 words
(6.1 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
An Analysis of Main Characters of Shakespeare in Othello, King Lear, Antony and Cleopatra, and Macbeth - An Analysis of Main Characters of Shakespeare in Othello, King Lear, Antony and Cleopatra, and Macbeth William Shakespere had a unique gift for finding what his audience liked then sticking with it. He wrote to entertain and knew what people wanted. In his work you can find repetion in the actions, stories, and characters that he created. Four main characters in Othello, King Lear, Antony and Cleopatra, and MacBeth are all distinctly different and also so much alike. You will be able to see these contrasts threw a brief discription of each character....   [tags: Papers] 2934 words
(8.4 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Mary, Eve, and Lilith in Shakespeare's King Lear, Othello, and Macbeth Essay - Mary, Eve, and Lilith in King Lear, Othello, and Macbeth       Feminist criticism often explores the symbolic or archetypal use of the Biblical figures of Mary and Eve in literary criticism. One figure which seems appropriate to such discussions, but so far neglected it seems, is the figure of Lilith. Indeed, in the case of Shakespearean criticism, Lilith seems an appropriate model at times for such characters as Goneril, Regan, Lady Macbeth, and so forth. Accordingly, it is my intention to explore this lost archetype and relate it to three of Shakespeare's tragedies: King Lear, Othello, and Macbeth....   [tags: comparison compare contrast essays]
:: 20 Works Cited
3148 words
(9 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]

Related Searches




. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

            We have this hour a constant will to publish

            Our daughters' several dowers. . .

     . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

            Which of you [three daughters] shall we say doth love us most?

            That we our largest bounty may extend

            Where nature doth with merit challenge. . . .2

 

    Lear does not bestow his kingdom upon his eldest son, nor is he even

going to bestow the largest portion of the divided kingdom upon his eldest

son. He expresses his intent to split his kingdom and grant the pieces as

his daughters' dowers, the largest piece being granted to whichever of the

three professes to love him most.  This is a violation of the natural order

of commonly accepted hierarchy that states a father's estate  be endowed

upon his eldest son.  An error in judgement and untempered release of anger

are also factors contributing to Lear's downfall.  Lear listens to flattery

from Goneril, "I love you more than word can wield the/matter;"3 and Regan,

"I find she [Goneril] names my very deed of love,/Only she comes too short.

. ."4 in their bidding to profess they love Lear the most among the three

daughters, but Cordelia does not compete with their flattery:

            [Cor] Unhappy that I am, I cannot heave

            My heart into my mouth.  I love your Majesty

[Lear]   According to my bond [filial], no more nor less.5

 

    Cordelia cannot flatter Lear with praise and states that she merely

loves him as a daughter should love her father, with respect and obedience.

Lear is so heartbroken by his youngest, and until then his most beloved,

daughter's refusal to praise him with her love that a rage ensues:

            Lear.  Let it be so! thy truth then be they dower!

            For, by the sacred radiance of the sun,

            The mysteries of Hecate and the night;

            By all the operation of the orbs [stars]

            From whom we do exist and cease to be;

            Here I disclaim all my paternal care,

            Propinquity and property of blood,

            And as a stranger to my heart and me

            Hold thee from this for ever. . .6

 

    Lear acknowledges that Cordelia s speaking the truth.  Although

confessions of filial love are not inappropriate or evil, Lear's judgement

is clouded by anger at Cordelia's refusal to praise him with flattery as he

had planned and he swears by the gods that Cordelia is no longer his

daughter and chooses not to give any portion of land as her dower.  Lear's

disowning of his daughter for refusing to participate in his unnatural

rites of determining which daughters receive which lands has proved that

his judgements are misguided.  Finally, justice is fulfilled when Lear dies

at the end of the play.  The justice is in response to actions that he

commits which are not necessarily evil-hearted, but for the refusal to

abide by the "Great Chain of Being" and his irrational and cruel disowning

and banishment of Cordelia.

    Goneril suffers the same fate as Lear.  However, Goneril's death is a

direct result of a series of vile, ruthless, and despicable actions,

whereas Lear's death was a result of irrational judgements and unnatural

actions.  The first instance that hints at Goneril's evil nature appears in

a conversation between her and Regan as soon as Lear hands down his power

of state to them:

            [Gon] There is further compliment of leave-taking be-

            tween France and him.  Pray you let's hit together.  If our

            father carry authority with such disposition as he bears,

            This last surrender of his will but offend us.7

 

    Goneril proposes to Regan that they join forces in stripping Lear of

his authority because she views it as a threat.  This would be considered

an evil act if Goneril was just a peasant or vassal, to plot treason

against the king, but it is worse since Goneril is plotting against her own

father. Clearly she has no respect for Lear as king, superior, or father.

The extent of Goneril's disrespect for hierarchical bonds and her evil

nature is further revealed in the following letter:

            Let our reciprocal vows be remembered.  You [Edmund] have

many opportunities to cut him [Cornwall] off.  If your will want not, time and place will be fruitfully offered.8

 

    The letter is from Goneril to Edmund.  It details Goneril's wish for

Edmund to kill her husband, Cornwall.  Not only has Goneril disregarded her

filial bond with Lear by disrespecting him and going against his wishes,

but she does worse than that by disregarding her marital bond with Cornwall

and plotting his murder.  Finally, passing the point of plotting murder,

Goneril commits the act herself:

            Edg. What means this bloody knife?

            [Gent]  'Tis hot, it smokes.

            It came even from the heart of--O, she's dead!

            Alb.  Who dead?  Speak, man.

Gent.  Your lady [Goneril], sir, your lady! and her sister [Regan] By her is poisoned; she hath confessed it.9

 

    Goneril admits having administered a poison to Regan.  Her main purpose

was to have Edmund for herself and he would not have to choose between

them. However, after Edmund is slain by Edgar and Cornwall has proof in the

form of the letter that Goneril plotted against him, Goneril decides there

is no course of action other than to take her own life.  There is no more

evil a person than someone who turns against a parent that gave her life,

plots to take the life of her eternally vowed husband, and finally takes

the life of another human being.  Goneril proves to be the basest evil by

fulfilling all the aforementioned symptoms and there is no more just

punishment for Goneril than her death.

    Edmund is a character whose death is a befitting justice for his acts

of betrayal throughout the play.  The illegitimate son of Gloucester,

Edmund seeks his father's lands through scheming and deception.  His

motives are first made clear in the following soliloquy:

            Edm.  Thou, Nature, art my goddess; to thy law

            My services are bound.  Wherefore should I

            Stand in the plague of custom and permit

            The curiosity of nations to deprive me,

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

            Legitimate Edgar, I must have your land.10

 

    Edmund's thoughts are of his illegitimacy.  He proclaims that as

Gloucester's son, he is entitled to his lands, and customs of the realm

should not be able to keep them from him.  The last sentence of the

quotation shows that he views the lands as Edgar's already, even though

Gloucester is far from retiring and passing them on to his heir, and it is

against Edgar that he must plot to receive those lands.  Edmund's scheming

against Edgar is made clear in the latter part of the soliloquy:

 

            Well, my legitimate, if this letter speed

            And my invention thrive, Edmund the base

            shall top the legitimate; I grow; I prosper.11

 

    Edmund has, cunningly, conceived a letter that will put him above Edgar

in Gloucester's favour.  The letter reads, "If our father would sleep till

I waked him, you should/enjoy half his revenue for ever,"12 and is written

in the likeness of Edgar's script and signed by his name.  It seems to

Gloucester that Edgar would kill him to enjoy his revenue and estate with

Edmund.  The ploy Edmund initiated makes Edgar look like a traitor.  In a

hurried and hectic conversation Edmund confuses Edgar, who is ignorant to

Edgar's ambitious scheming, into fleeing from Gloucester, making him look

guilty of Gloucester's suspicions:

             Edm.  . . . O sir, fly this place!

            Intelligence is given where you are hid.

            You have now the good advantage of the night.

            Have you not spoken 'gainst the Duke of Cornwall?

            He's coming hither; now, i' the night, i' the haste,

            And Regan with him.  Have you nothing said

            Upon his party 'gainst the Duke of Albany?

            Advise yourself.

            Edg. I am sure on't, not a word.

            Edm.  I hear my father coming.  Pardon me!

            In cunning I must draw my sword upon you.

            Draw, seem to defend yourself; now quit you well.--

            Yield!  Come before my father.  Light, ho, here!

            Fly, brother.--Torches, torches!--So farewell.13

 

    Edmund asks Edgar if he has offended the Dukes of Cornwall or Albany

that would provoke Cornwall to come to Gloucester's castle with such haste

in the middle of the night.  Edgar pleads innocence, forcing Edmund to

enhance his deception.  He tells Edgar that he must draw his sword as if

defending himself or trying to capture a wanted man.  Edgar flees, and to

enhance the deception in Gloucester's eyes even further Edmund stabs

himself. "Bringing the murderous coward [Edgar] to the stake;/He that

conceals him, death."14 Gloucester, arriving on the scene, is convinced of

Edgar's treason.  Edmund has removed Edgar from his father's favour, but

does not yet possess Gloucester's lands or wealth.  An opportunity presents

itself which Edmund plans to take advantage of:

Glou.  . . .I have received a letter this night--'tis dangerous to be spoken—I have locked the letter in my closet.  These injuries the King now bears will be revenged home; there is a part of a power already footed. . .15

 

    Gloucester reveals to Edmund a letter he received.  It entails that a

secret power, France, has landed in the realm to revenge disrespect toward

Lear.  Edmund says:

             Edm.  This courtesy, forbid thee, shall the Duke

            Instantly know, and of that letter too.

            Seems a fair deserving, and must draw me

            That which my father loses--no less than all.

            The younger rises when the old doth fall.16

 

    Edmund plans to tell the Duke of Albany of the letter Gloucester has

received and of his journey to inform Lear of the French forces coming to

aid him.  The information makes Gloucester look like a traitor in the

Duke's eyes and Edmund realizes he will be rewarded with his father's lands

since they will be stripped from him for treason.  Edmund's evil

heartedness and willingness to sacrifice his family for status and wealth

clearly demands some sort of punishment as justice.  It is only fitting

that the betrayal of his own blood, both his father and brother, is

answered by justice in his death at Edgar's hands.

    Lear, Goneril, and Edmund were each motivated in different ways. Lear's

was an unnatural and irrational motivation.  Greed and selfishness moved

Edmund to the decisions he made.  Lastly, Goneril's heart was of the basest

evil and jealousy.  Although the methods and paths of their downfall were

different, each person suffers the identical fate as decided by justice.

It is debatable whether each decision we make is weighed on a cosmic scale

with justice waiting to punish the evil or reward the good, but what is

certain is that each decision we make plays a direct role in our futures.

 

NOTES

1William Shakespeare, King Lear (New York:  Washington Square Press, 1987), I.i..38-41.

            2Ibid., I.i.37-54.

            3Ibid., I.i.56-57.

            4Ibid., I.i.75-76.

            5Ibid., I.i.96-98.

            6Ibid., I.i.115-123.

            7Ibid., I.i.331-334.

            8Ibid., IV.vi.287-289.

            9Ibid., V.iii.266-271.

            10Ibid., I.ii.1-16.

            11Ibid., I.ii.19-21.

            12Ibid., I.ii.52-53.

            13Ibid., II.i.20-33.

            14Ibid., II.i.68-69.

            15Ibid., III.iii.8-13.

            16Ibid., III.iii.20-24.

 

Reference List

 

Shakespeare, William. King Lear.  Eric A., McCann, ed. Harcourt Brace Jovanovick, Canada Inc., Canada. 1998

 

Bradley, A.C.  Lecture IX: Macbeth . Shakespearean Tragedies: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth . Macmllan & Co., 1904.  

 Brooks, Cleanth. The Well Wrought Urn: Studies of the Structure of Poetry.   London: Reynal & Hitchcock, 1947.  

 Curry, Walter. Shakespeare s Philosophical Patterns. London: Mass Peter   Smith, 1968.  

Campbell, Lily B. Shakespeare’s Tragic Heroes, Slaves of Passion. Gloucester: Peter Smith Publisher Inc., 1973.

 

Knight, G. Wilson, 1949. The Wheel of Fire. Methuen & Co. Ltd.

 

Hazlitt, William.  Macbeth . Characters of Shakespeare s Plays and Lectures   on the English Poets. London: Macmillan & Co., 1903.  

 Schlegel, August Wilhelm.  Criticism on Shakespeare s Tragedies . A Course    of Lectures on Dramatic Art and Literature. London: AMS Press, Inc., 1965.  

 

Jorgensen, Paul A. William Shakespeare: The Tragedies.   Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1985.

Kott, Jan. Shakespeare Our Contemporary. Garden City: Doubleday & Company, 1994.

Shakespeare, William, 1998.  King Lear.  Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rackin, Phyllis. Shakespeare's Tragedies. New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing Company, 1988.

Shakespeare, William.  King Lear.  New York:  Washington Square Press, 1987.


Return to 123HelpMe.com