Will the Long Cable be Sound? The Ecological Impact of the Cross-Sound Cable
There has been an unfortunate trend in the way that people of
the Western culture treat the environment. Often times there appear
to be two sides to this battle being fought by extremist perspectives.
On one side stand the environmentalists who in some cases seek to
block any move that may harm the environment, and on the other side
stand the corporate people who seek to justify both a profitable and a
logistical means to benefit those involved. A current battle being fought
deals with the installation and usage of the Long Island Sound Pipeline.
This project raises important issues such as the economic, social, and
environmental importance of the Sound, as well as the present and
possible future environmental consequences of the actions taken.
All too often it appears as though if a change which seems to
be beneficial towards humans will “only” effect the environment and
most do not believe that effect will have a direct effect on humans, then
we can chalk the change up to Darwin’s theory of evolution, implying
that it is natural and necessary. On the other hand, if a change in the
environment might harm or cause an inconvenience for humans, but
would be beneficial to the environment, then we suddenly do not want
to interfere with nature. Unfortunately, even some that have the title of
“environmentalists” have failed to step on the other side of this Western
wall that we have built ourselves which barricades and blinds us. Many
bricks that that make up this Western wall are built upon the idea that
humans and nature are two separate entities, and that humans are the
more significant of the two. The most frightening thing about installing
the cross-sound cable is not the particular environmental consequences,
but the lack of concern that many have about the consequences.
Why is it Important to Preserve the Long Island Sound?
The Long Island Sound is extremely important not only to
the ecosystems of New York and Connecticut, but to a much larger
portion of the ocean than one might imagine. One of the reasons for its
extreme significance is because it is an estuary. Although some animals
are permanent residents of estuaries, there are many fish and other
animals that use the estuary as a safe haven to protect their young. If
this area is not protected, many of these fish and other animals would
die off before they were able to mature and produce offspring. If these
animals are not able to reach sexual maturity, it will ultimately lead to
Change is good." We hear the catchy phrase everywhere. From company slogans to motivational speeches, our world seems to impose this idea that change is always a good thing. Assuming that the change is for the better, it is probably a true statement in most cases. The root of this idea seems to come from the notion that we are dissatisfied with the state that we are in, so, in order to create a more enjoyable surrounding, we adjust. Others, however, stray from this practice, and instead of trying to adapt to the people around them, they try and change others.
The sources used by the author dictated the conversation that could be issued. The difference stances and opinions gave the author a broader viewpoint to discuss the issue on. With the aid of sources and references, many being used above, she gave the reader a different view point of the problem, debating the reader to determine whether it truly is something that cannot be controlled or is something that can easily be avoided based on freewill.
Abraham Maslow was a man who contributed his time to understand a positive side of mental health. He studied about minds that bring people together and discovered how humans have needs and wants. Unlike others, he was interested in laboratory science and the experimental side as well. Maslow created his own hierarchy of basic needs which were psychological needs, safety and security, love and belonging and esteem needs. Psychologist all around the world look up to him as a great leader and psychologist (Boeree, 2006.)
The Tempest in the Wilderness is an insightful and well-written article. It brings up some interesting ideas and draws surprising parallels between The Tempest and the colonization of the New World. Ronald Takaki skillfully analyzes the play and carries out his ideas to their completion. His research is extensive and it incorporates all perspectives. It is an important piece to re ad for a CSJ student because it includes all of the facts and tells both sides of the story, similar to A People’s History. Articles such as this are essential to having a well rounded perspective of history and of works of art such as The Tempest.
In contrast to this, in ‘The Tiger’s Bride’, the bride chooses to turn into a beast herself, stating that “men denied me rationality just as they denied it to all those who were not exactly like themselves”. Unlike Shelley, who censures society as a whole, Carter’s critique has feminist undertones, which is reflective of the second-wave feminist movement, and provides a new perspective for readers of her retellings. Though she is denied a name, Carter gives her a voice by opting for a first-person point of view, making her a more powerful character than Beauty, and foreshadowing Carter’s twist ending. Despite his odd requests, at no point within the story does the beast do anything to harm anyone, rendering the bride’s and society’s fear of him unfounded. Indeed, the bride’s fear of him has its roots in the story she was told when she was a child (“he will gobble you up”). Nevertheless, she mentions that the beast “was far more frightened of me than I was of him.” The bride’s choice to walk her own path and move away from the society that has shunned her raises this question. Is it c...
proceeds in the face of such knowledge, where it would not be so if they did not know”.
Through The Tempest play, William Shakespeare weaves together a tale that is characterized by anti-colonialist sentiments. Prospero - the deposed Milan Duke - adopts a colonialist mentality by treating his colleagues as slaves who have no rights. Characters who suffer mistreatment under Prospero include: Ariel - the spirit creature; Ferdinand - the Naples Prince; and Caliban - Sycorax’s son. Prospero possesses much magical power which he uses to oppress his compatriots. Consequently, Prospero is portrayed as a colonial tyrant who abuses his immense power. Anti-colonialism feelings are especially evident through the actions, utterances and disposition and of Caliban, Miranda, Ferdinand and Ariel. To illustrate, Caliban berates Prospero for the former’s forced labor. Likewise, Ariel protests Prospero’s reluctance to release the former as earlier agreed. Miranda also expresses her dissatisfaction with Prospero’s unfair imprisonment of Ferdinand. Similarly, Ferdinand appears to challenge Prospero’s authority by briefly stopping dragging timber so as to flirt and chat with Miranda. The foregoing four characters exhibit conduct that highlights their displeasure with Prospero’s colonial-style authority over them. From the preceding expose, it can thus be concluded that Shakespeare’s The Tempest play is about anti-colonialism based on its depiction of Caliban, Miranda, Ferdinand and Ariel’s opposition to Prospero’s oppressive authority.
Frankenstein, speaking of himself as a young man in his father’s home, points out that he is unlike Elizabeth, who would rather follow “the aerial creations of the poets”. Instead he pursues knowledge of the “world” though investigation. As the novel progresses, it becomes clear that the meaning of the word “world” is for Frankenstein, very much biased or limited. He thirsts for knowledge of the tangible world and if he perceives an idea to be as yet unrealised in the material world, he then attempts to work on the idea in order to give it, as it were, a worldly existence. Hence, he creates the creature that he rejects because its worldly form did not reflect the glory and magnificence of his original idea. Thrown, unaided and ignorant, into the world, the creature begins his own journey into the discovery of the strange and hidden meanings encoded in human language and society. In this essay, I will discuss how the creature can be regarded as a foil to Frankenstein through an examination of the schooling, formal and informal, that both of them go through. In some ways, the creature’s gain in knowledge can be seen to parallel Frankenstein’s, such as, when the creature begins to learn from books. Yet, in other ways, their experiences differ greatly, and one of the factors that contribute to these differences is a structured and systematic method of learning, based on philosophical tenets, that is available to Frankenstein but not to the creature.
Maslow was a founder and forefather of a major school of thought in Psychology which is Humanistic Psychology. Maslow’s research and understanding of humans and the way we work and function were based majorly on personality and the theory of it. Maslow had strongly believed that each person is cable of obtaining self-actualization which is the highest form one can obtain. Maslow could come up ...
Once in a generation, and only a few rare instances in a millennia, a certain designation of academic and/or scientist enters into the pursuit of knowledge that captures the epitome of makeup and living -the dynamic of life- to such a prolific magnitude that the world is revolutionized in their wake. Abraham Maslow so completely documented and achieved a level of understating of the causes of human events that his work effectively captivates the struggle of human life and achievement. His theories on the constitution of human needs provide an explanation as to just exactly why people do the things they do, and demonstrate the integral forces behind human behavior. His pyramid is an ubiquitous reference to the needs of human beings, and serves as a guide to those in positions of authority and influence when carrying out their duties for their constituents/charges. It also serves as invaluable doctrine for any and all who wish to take the necessary steps to take care of themselves, and learn the appropriate steps by which to lead fulfilling and successful lives, by outlining the empirical needs of the individual, and in which order they need be addressed. Furthermore, his observations regarding these steps constitute a guide by which to achieve a panacea for the difficulties of life’s struggles: from everyday petty grievances, to even the most arduous of scenarios- ending with (assuming the first levels have been met) a state of sublimity and enlightenment, also known as self-actualization. However, to confine Maslow’s accomplishments to his work in the “Pyramid/ hierarchy of needs” would hardly be sufficient, rather, a gross misrepresentation of a lifetime of work on behalf of humanity, and an account, while even unable to do...
... own idea of their balance and enforce the idea that the importance of such is invaluable, thus aiding in the search for oneself as an individual.
...ately, disinterestedly, without emotions” (38). To do so would allow us to think for ourselves and not be swayed in any other direction by any other factors. As humans we are naturally social creatures. That is how civilization began, by humans interacting with each other. We need to be able to understand ourselves and trust ourselves so that we can make the decisions for ourselves and not me mindless ants just following the crowd. In the end the main person that is affected by decisions is the one who is making the decision.
regard to other people, or one can base a decision on how it will be
that many people may not know what they are taking into their bodies. It will
In this essay I am going to be deciding to what extent that I think