Respect for Persons,Beneficence, and Justice

  • Length: 1713 words (4.9 double-spaced pages)
  • Rating: Excellent
Open Document

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Text Preview

More ↓

Continue reading...

Open Document

Respect for Persons,Beneficence, and Justice

In July of 1974 The National Research Act was signed into law. Through this act, The Belmont Report was developed over 4 year period of time that included an intense four day conference followed by monthly meetings until it was completed in April of 1979. The Belmont Report sets out to define the ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. The report was established prior to Barney Clark and the artificial heart and therefore was the guidelines that the doctors and researchers had to follow. The report highlights three essential ethical elements that are pertinent in human research and their applications. It was the professional responsibility of the doctors and researchers involved to abide by previously established ethical guidelines.

Respect for Persons

Respect for the Persons as it relates to the Barney Clark case can be broken down into three important issues.


The doctors made the assumption that Barney Clark was a fully autonomous person at the time of the artificial heart experiment. In general it is not in doubt that Mr. Clark was an autonomous being, however his terminal condition could have affected his capacity with in the case. While he might have been autonomous in many areas of his life the issue that is relevant to the case was whether he possessed the capacity to make an informed consent.

Informed Consent

The nine basic rules4 for an informed consent are

1. Identifying the appropriate decision maker

2. Having the discussion at a time when the patient is not distracted or in great pain.

3. Determine that the patient is communicating voluntarily

4. Disclose

a. Nature of the proposed intervention

b. The purpose

c. The risks and consequences

d. The benefits

e. The probability that the intervention would be successful

f. The feasible alternatives

g. The prognosis is the intervention/therapy is not given

5. Offer a recommendation


Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Respect for Persons,Beneficence, and Justice." 26 May 2018
Title Length Color Rating  
Essay on The Principle of Beneficence in Biomedicine - INTRODUCTION Munyaradzi (2012) critically explores the in-depth weaknesses of beneficence and certain points where it becomes a principle under scrutiny. He begins by blaming ethicists for not exploring the depth of the principle of beneficence in several fields especially in biomedicine. Further, it provides the layman with an introduction to the principle and to how it is used by various health practitioners throughout the world, along with discussing the history of the idea. He then sheds light numerous cases where it becomes highly problematic for physicians to decide upon the issue....   [tags: critical relfections, the utilitarian principle]
:: 8 Works Cited
898 words
(2.6 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
The Famous Five and the Persons Case Essay - ... She was supported by the Federated Women’s Institute and National Council of Women. Also, over 500 000 people wrote letters and signed petitions to support Murphy being appointed as a senator (Alberta Online Encyclopedia, 2004). However, Robert Borden, the Prime Minister during that time, refused to appoint Murphy into the Senate as women weren’t “persons”. Two other prime ministers, Meighen and Mackenzie both promised to make changes to the British North American Act to include women as persons, but both failed to do so....   [tags: women, persons, senate, rights] 796 words
(2.3 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Essay on The Six Ethical Principles - ... These ethical principles are Beneficence, Autonomy, Justice, No maleficence, Fidelity and Veracity. We will be looking at how each one of the ethical principles impact a practitioner’s behavior and actions in the rehabilitation process. Beneficence: This ethical principle simply stated means to do good, to be proactive and also to prevent harm to the client when possible. It reflects the counselor's responsibility to contribute to the welfare of the client. Why is important for the counselor to abide by this code....   [tags: benefience, counselors, autonomy] 1618 words
(4.6 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
Young Persons who Commit Murder Should be Tried as Adults Essay - The youth of our country are capable of many accomplishments. These range from outstanding community service to committing indictable offences. Today young people are fortunate enough to have similar privileges as adults such as driving/ operating countless types of vehicles, being left to take responsibility for children (babysitting) and themselves. With all of these privileges and responsibilities that youth gladly undertake, they should be required to accept appropriate consequences for their actions....   [tags: criminal justice] 669 words
(1.9 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Justice for All Except Persons of Japanese Descent Essay example - Justice for All Except Persons of Japanese Descent America… Land of the free and home of the brave. Land of the free… Land of the free… Funny that the land of the free would steal away the lives of 119,000 individuals simply because they looked different. Nothing like good old irony to bring a country together. During the late 1800's, there was a large rise in the immigration of Japanese to the U.S, much to the dismay of many American citizens. The Japanese have long been discriminated against in the U.S....   [tags: Papers] 1124 words
(3.2 pages)
Good Essays [preview]
Restorative Justice Essay - Restorative justice is an innovative approach to the criminal justice system that focuses on repairing the harm caused by crimes committed. The methods used in the conventional justice system may deter the offender from committing further crimes, but it does neither repair the harm caused, nor help them acknowledge their responsibility, instead it stigmatises them, worsening the situation instead of improving it (Johnstone 2003). “Stigmatisation is the kind of shaming that creates outcasts; it is disrespectful, humiliating” (p.85)....   [tags: Criminal Justice ]
:: 6 Works Cited
943 words
(2.7 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Essay about Defining Respect - "(What you want Baby, I got What you need Do you know I got it. All I'm askin' Is for a little respect when you come home (just a little bit) Hey baby (just a little bit) when you get home (just a little bit) mister (just a little bit) " Lyrics from the song, "Respect" by Aretha Franklin In three seperate dictionaries, respect is defined as a regard for or appreciation of the worth or value of someone or something....   [tags: Definition Respect Respecting Essays] 563 words
(1.6 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Respect Essay - How would the world differ without respect. Respect is the act of showing someone that you value his or her feelings and thoughts. Respect is a universal value that each person desires not only to embody, but also to receive. Respect is not just what you say but also the way you act. Showing people that you take their feelings and thoughts into consideration are how to earn respect. If you demonstrate respect toward others, then others will respect you and listen to your opinions. Respect begins with self-respect and then extends to the respect of others....   [tags: Morality] 648 words
(1.9 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Respect Essay - One of the keys to building or tearing down ego is respect. The communication of respect or the failure to communicate respect can greatly affect self esteem. Oftentimes it can take a lifetime of investment to communicate love, respect, and admiration. Self doubt and poor self-esteem can often erode the efforts of a friend or mentor to encourage and support. Oftentimes, though, building and destroying self-esteem can take place in a very short time. The ego buster and the ego booster in my life are one in the same person....   [tags: Communication] 724 words
(2.1 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Respect Essay - Respect Many people have different ideas about what respect means. I think it means having respect for others, property, and respect for yourself. Most people want respect even if it is just a little. The American Heritage Dictionary states that respect is 1. A feeling of appreciative, often deferential regard, esteem. 2. The state of being regarded with honor or esteem. 3. Willingness to show consideration or appreciation. People demand different amounts of respect, though not everyone is willing to give the amount needed....   [tags: Definition Essays Explication] 569 words
(1.6 pages)
Good Essays [preview]

Related Searches

Ensure comprehension

7. Acknowledge any emotional reaction from the patient and respond

8. Validate the patient’s decision

9. Summarize

The case questioned the quality of the informed consent received from the patient. Two of the nine basic rules for obtaining valid informed consent might not exist in the Barney Clark case: Barney’s conditions and the information disclosed might not adequately validate the informed consent that he rendered. The lack of a valid informed consent can result in the prosecution of the physician in the court of law, which is detrimental to both the physicians involved in the case and the medical profession. Prior to the operation, Barney Clark’s condition steadily worsened. His heart beat feebly, his blood pressure dropped dangerously low, and he required oxygen supplementation. It was under these mentally and physically crippling conditions that he placed his signature on the consent form. In order to ensure Barney Clark’s competency, physicians must determine whether the influences arising from these conditions diminish his capacity for a valid consent. Physicians must also ensure that they have disclosed fully to Barney Clark all of the probable risks associated with the operation.

However a truly informed consent in research is difficult, more specifically when it comes to the disclosure of pertinent information. All of the pertinent information especially about the risks and benefits are not known. There are hopes and fears but no hard facts. The “reasonable volunteer” standard can be used in which the person is informed that the procedure is not fully understood and that it is experimental, therefore understanding that their participation is more for the advancement of knowledge than for their personal benefit. The term therapeutic misconception has been used in research, such that the patient still believes in the therapeutic benefit to them. However through interviews with Barney Clark prior to his death, it is evident that Mr. Clark was acting in an altruistic fashion. The chance to participate in the study was offered to Mr. Clark a month prior to the implementation, however he didn’t feel ready yet. As his conditioned worsened he decided to go through with the operation. He told his wife, "First of all, I don't think it will work. I'm weaker and more tired than those animals I've seen, and I don't think it's going to save my life. But I have been kept alive for the last year on medicines that other people have given their lives to give me. Now its my turn to pay those people back."5 He was then placed in the ICU and asked to sign the consent form. While it is argued that he signed the consent form in “great pain” it is evident that this was not a spur of the moment decision, but one he grappled with for a month before altruistically committing himself to the surgery. Even after sitting in the ICU waiting the required 24hrs to sign the same consent form again as required on what would have been one of his last breaths he asked the doctors to continue and get it over with.


The domination of the Barney Clark case in the media leads to the question of confidentiality. It was said that for the 112 days that Clark lived with his artificial heart, members of the media crammed to the hospital, wanting to know every facet of his care, and medical students at the University of Utah were taken to see Clark. Did Barney Clark want such massive media exposure? Or was his operation and recovery a convenient means for the University of Utah hospital to expose itself to the world? Such exposure, on the part of the hospital, is desirable as it equates to public recognition, and eventually, financial gains. If confidentially, of diagnosis and treatment, is one of the tenets of medical ethics, the abandonment of this principle in the Barney Clark's situation should raise eyebrows.


The case questions whether the implantation of the artificial heart represents a situation in which physicians used a human person for the purpose of experimentation (i.e. as a guinea pig). Since it was the first of its kind, the prognosis for the Barney Clark after the operation was, at best, uncertain. His consent form lays out the overwhelming risks. It stated that, “There is no guarantee that the implantation of an artificial heart will add any additional time to my life” and recognized that “there is substantial and serious harm, including death”. It has been argued both ways that the professionals involved acted beneficently. The principle of beneficence leaves troubling ethical dilemmas within this case.

For a reasonable person to undertake such great risk, one would think that there must be a proportional good that could result from the success of the operation. Unfortunately, there is none. Even if the operation was successful in prolonging Barney Clark’s life, his prospects were disheartening, for the rest of his life, he will be tethered to a power source the size of a dishwasher along with a vast array of tubing, air pumps, and other bulky machinery. Existence is desirable, but to exist with such burden could be considered lamentable. With these facts, the motive of the physicians in performing operation is questionable. Did they perform the operation with the intention of doing good for the patient (beneficence)? Or was their primary intention the advancement of medical research irrespective of the consequences to the patient? In the latter case, both the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence and justice are broken. The principle of non-maleficence requires a physician to do no harm, and yet, on the superficial surface, harms seem to have been perpetrated against Barney Clark

However it has been argued as well the professionals involved did act beneficently towards Barney Clark. The Hippocratic Oath that all physicians take requires that the doctors do no harm and maximize the good while minimizing the bad, such that proportionally the doing of the good outweighs the potential harm. However research is difficult in that the results are unknown, both researchers and doctors can’t predict all of the consequences of the treatment. They have to first learn what is harmful through experimentation. In the Barney Clark case, the professionals involved where unsure of the harmful side affects. While the artificial hearts had been placed in animals with a semblance of a working fashion a human is a different story. It can be very well argued that there was going to be little to know direct benefit to Mr. Clark, however to society on a large the long-term benefits have resulted in an improvement of the knowledge of artificial hearts that is demonstrated by the attempts of development currently going on at this time. This is where the much-debated ethical dilemma arises. Human knowledge isn’t sufficient enough to answer many of the questions raised and regardless of the choice made serious moral issues will remain.


Justice deals with the issues of fairness and who has the rights to the benefits and burdens that are entailed in research. There are many ethical and practical discussions to how resources should be distributed on a society and individual level. With in the Belmont report these were structured down to the fair selection of subjects, however it is important to also consider the financial costs of the research.

Millions of dollars of funding went into producing the Jarvik-7 and it was estimated that if it would work it could cost a minimum to $70,000 per patient.1 Was the cost of the artificial heart worth it and who was going to pay for it? These two questions circled in many ethical debates surrounding the Jarvik-7. The research was expensive, the implementation was expensive and the cost of the maintenance after implementation was expensive. The cost really raises the issue of justice. Who decides how to spend the money and who gets access to it? Many argued that the cost was not proportional to the outcome and even a success would still leave it out of reach for to many. However, research has to begin somewhere. The first computers, for example, where large bulky and cost obscene amount of money, today they are commonplace and affordable for the average family. The Jarvik-7 might not have been a truly complete model but was an initial step towards the researcher's goals of making a functioning artificial heart.

Return to