The Objectivity of History

  • Length: 1294 words (3.7 double-spaced pages)
  • Rating: Excellent
Open Document

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Text Preview

More ↓

Continue reading...

Open Document

The Objectivity of History

The issues that are raised in this source by Marc Trachtenberg are is whether or not objectivity is still a relevant idea, and if it is not then is history in fact dying. Keith Jenkins' "What is History?," Carl Becker's "What are Historical Facts?" and Richard Evans' "In Defence of History" will be used to discuss and examine these issues.
Marc Trachtenberg is questioning if objectivity is possible and desirable in today's society, and this is a question that many historians have pondered. Keith Jenkins and Richard Evans are the two historians that will be used in relation to this debate. Trachtenberg believes that history should be ultimately obtainable however, he is worried that the way in which society is heading that it will soon become an obsolete ideology. His believes that history's ultimate goal is to discover the truth. Trachtenberg believes that you should "put your political beliefs aside and frame questions in such a way that the answers turned on what the evidence showed." He realizes that this may be a slightly naïve idea however he still stands by this belief even when others such as Keith Jenkins have totally given up on objectivity.

Keith Jenkins in his article "What is history" sets outs his opinion on why objectivity is in fact impossible to achieve in the study of history. His perception is that that "actual past has gone" and in its place we have created history in the present and that the "content is as much invented as found." His theory is that a historian cannot escape his or her own preconceived ideas and personal motives to the extent that history could be written in an objective way. He goes as far to set out the steps and within the reasons why historians write the way they do. He says that through the selection of evidence the historian's prejudices are at work, disregarding pieces that do not fit in with their own ideologies. Jenkins was a post modernist historian and his context is important in why he thought they way he did. The post modernist movement was one that believed that historical objectivity was an oxymoron and that history was more of an entertainment than an arm of academic study. The post modernism movement was established after the confusion of the World Wars. This explains why their notions on history because scientific history had been the prevailing idea in history until this occurred.

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"The Objectivity of History." 19 Apr 2018
Title Length Color Rating  
Essay on Objectivity In History - Objectivity in History First exposure to history, whether it be at home or at school, will almost certainly be at an age when the child can do no other than expect to be told the truth. So, from the very beginning, whether we find history dull or exciting, easy or hard, we do at least assume that we are being given an accurate account of the past. Our subsequent growing up can be seen as a process of progressively shedding the literal beliefs of early life, from Father Christmas and Easter Bunny, to parental infallibility and perhaps religion; the literal truth of the history we learn could be regarded as a further casualty along that road....   [tags: Education Learning Papers] 2132 words
(6.1 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
Essay on The Ideal of Objectivity in Political Dialogue - The Ideal of Objectivity in Political Dialogue ABSTRACT: If political dialogue is to identify and redress existing forms of injustice, participants in the dialogue must be able to appeal to the concept of objectivity in order to exchange claims, attitudes, and background beliefs which distort or conceal various forms of injustice. The conceptions of objectivity traditionally employed in liberal democratic political philosophy are not well-suited to play this role because they are insufficiently sensitive to the social and ideological pluralism of modern societies....   [tags: Politics Philosophy Philosophical Essays]
:: 1 Works Cited
3225 words
(9.2 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
Internet: The Objectivity of Search Engines Essay - Introduction In this essay I am going to discuss critically the objectivity of search engines. The purpose of my research was to deny the title of the topic. Hereby I am going to discuss some notions such as ,,Filter Bubble”; written by the authors involved in personalization of search engine. We all as users are using web search services like Google Web Search every day(World Wide Web Conference, 2013).It became our source of information, whether we are searching news, hot topics, study material, sport results, job or a place of our holiday....   [tags: search results, personalization, google]
:: 12 Works Cited
2017 words
(5.8 pages)
Term Papers [preview]
Essay about History, the Concatenation of Human Experiences - History, the Concatenation of Human Experiences In June 1961, I left Berlin, Germany, with my parents, my sister, and my Swedish cousin enroute to Sweden for what was to be two weeks of Scandinavian fun. The Russian soldiers who processed us through the checkpoints were impeccably dressed in jodhpurs and the shiniest black riding boots I had ever seen. It was obvious they had been carefully selected for this job, which entailed a goodly measure of public relations; the Communists displayed only their best....   [tags: European Europe History] 1462 words
(4.2 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Partisan Journalism, A History of Media Bias in the United States, Jim A. Kuypers - In Partisan Journalism, A History of Media Bias in the United States, Jim A. Kuypers steers his audience on a journey from beginning to the end of American journalistic history, putting emphasis on the militaristic ideas of objectivity and partisanship. Kuypers confirm how the American journalistic tradition cultivated as a partisan root and, with only a short time for the objectivity in between, and then go back to those roots in which are today. Beginning this journey Kuypers starts off telling us about the summary of newspapers throughout the Colonial times, explaining that the papers around that time were honestly maneuvered in a particularly “partisan way”; he continues onto the discuss...   [tags: history, militaristic ideas] 985 words
(2.8 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Value Pluralism and Absolute Moral Judgments Essay - Widespread and deep moral disagreements are persistently resistant to rational solutions and thus allow for continuing debate over the validity of moral judgments. This paper will discuss prominent positions regarding whether moral judgments may be true and false in an absolute sense or a relative sense, in light of the diverse and intense disagreement in moral judgment. This paper will defend the pluralistic conclusion that if there are not specific universal values, there is at least a minimum value of humanity without which a society could not survive....   [tags: Normative Moral Relativity, Moral Objectivity] 1552 words
(4.4 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
Value Pluralism and Absolute Moral Judgments Essay - Widespread and deep moral disagreements are persistently resistant to rational solutions and thus allow for continuing debate over the validity of moral judgments. This paper will discuss prominent positions regarding whether moral judgments may be true and false in an absolute sense or a relative sense, in light of the diverse and intense disagreement in moral judgment. This paper will defend the pluralistic conclusion that if there are not specific universal values, there is at least a minimum value of humanity without which a society could not survive....   [tags: normative moral relativity, moral objectivity] 1552 words
(4.4 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
The Landscape of History Essay - In The Landscape of History, John Lewis Gaddis makes a cohesive argument concerning about the debate over the objectivity of truth by stating “objectivity as a consequence is hardly possible, and that there is, therefore, no such thing as truth (Gaddis 29). The question for objective history has long been debated by numerous historians, and the differing viewpoints of history have led to a transition in our ways of thinking in the modern world. Ultimately, the question that this paper focuses on is: to what extent is history objective....   [tags: Book Review, John Lewis Gaddis] 1626 words
(4.6 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Essay on The Value of History - The Value of History There would seem to be at least three possible viewpoints of the value of history. Clearly such a statement calls for the qualification that the positions represented by these viewpoints are unlikely to be sharply demarcated, but will generally merge into one another. The first is the view that history is bunk, often positively harmful, and that we should have as little to do with it as we can manage. Such an opinion would fit a strong belief that all that matters is the future, that preoccupation with the past can only hold us back, and indeed that lessons learned from the past are highly likely to be wrong and to lead us on to worse mistakes in the future....   [tags: Education Teaching Papers] 2134 words
(6.1 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
What is History? Essay - What is History. The definition of history, is a question which has sparked international debate for centuries between the writers, readers, and the makers of history. In the words of acclaimed historian Edward Gibbon, "History is indeed little more than the register of the crimes, follies and misfortunes of mankind." A more romantic view on the subject was taken by Cicero. He said, "History is the witness that testifies the passing of time. It illuminates reality, vitalizes memory, provides guidance of daily life and brings us tidings of antiquity" History, described in the simplest of terms, can be seen as a record of events that have occurred in the past that the historian has taken...   [tags: Papers] 789 words
(2.3 pages)
Better Essays [preview]

Related Searches

However, after the world wars people like Keith Jenkins had seen historians who were supposedly unbiased rush to justify their country and demonize the enemy and thus destroying the current ideas of historical objectivity. Jenkins believes that history has no real relevance to the society of the day because he believes "That past, appropriated by historians, is never the past itself..." This is in direct conflict with Marc Trachtenberg, as he believes that history is in fact of "profound importance to society at large" and thus believes that objectivity has to be the ultimate goal of historians.
Richard Evans agrees with Trachtenberg's idea that history is important to society and that objectivity is obtainable in his article "In Defence of History." In this article he is trying to rebut the claims of post-modernists including Keith Jenkins' claims that his is insignificant and objectivity is a farce. He says that "The truth about patterns and linkages of facts in history is in the end discovered not invented, found not made..." Evans believes like Allan Bullock that if historians realize that he may have prejudices and then takes steps to counterbalance these then the history he or she writes will be historical accurate. He also believes that if a historian is open to other people's points of view then there should be no reason why objectivity would not occur. However, Evans does not believe that objectivity should be taken to the level in which it lacks imagination and character, as the past was a colorful and interesting time. In the last paragraph of this article Evans shows us how passionately he believes this, "I will look humbly at the past and say despite it them all: it really happened, and we really can... find out how it happened..." Evans view seems to be shaped by a more traditional view of history. This makes him similar to Marc Trachtenberg who also appears to value the older styles of history. This would of course influence their notions of objectivity, as throughout the history of history, scientific history has been the prevailing movement. Evans shows us this by dedicating most of his article to a history of historian's views on scientific methods. Trachtenberg by declaring he preferred "diplomatic" history to "feminist studies," one traditional and the other a distinctly modern phenomenon.
The second issue in need of discussion is the point that if history moves away form it's traditional roots then it will move away from objectivity and accuracy. Marc Trachtenberg in this source states that this is happening at the moment as we are now becoming more interested in political history and this by its very definition is a subjective history. He believes that when you step into the realm of political history you in fact step into the world of the "privileged." This term is meant to mean the group of people who are in control, in other words it is the victors history. His example of this phenomenon is "feminist studies," a branch of history that has only been around since after the women's liberation movement in the late 1960's and 1970's. This would cause problems to him because he has already let us now that he values diplomatic history and traditional history over the more diverse modern histories. Richard Evans has the same concerns when it comes to political history he writes "Politically committed history only damages itself if it distorts, manipulates or obscures historical fact in interests of the cause it claims to represent." Both men believe that politics can be a dangerous factor when it comes to history because it would be so easy to let their political ambitions or ideologies influence their writings. Becker believes that new generations and waves of history are not a new phenomenon and that they do not take away from the importance of history.

Carl Becker tells us in "What are historical facts?" that he believes that "it is well known that every generation writes the same history in a new way, and puts upon it a new construction." Becker goes on to say, "We build our conceptions of history partly out of our present needs and purposes." This means that he believes that each new generation writes history in a way that is relevant to them. This explains the new movements of things such as "feminist studies" because this is the major events that has happened in the current generation of writers. In this period, diplomatic history is less relevant because the western world has not known massive conflict in over 50 years. Context also helps to explain why Trachtenberg may see the importance of diplomatic history over that of political movements, as he was most likely largely influenced in his schooling by the experiences of World War II. Becker's purpose is to show us that history is important because it shows us the societies present values however Trachtenberg and Evans believe that the past is the foundations of society, as we know it today.

Through the discussion of these historians and their works in relation to historical objectivity, it is easy to see how the historian's purposes and contexts shaped their viewpoints. All of these historians are products of their times and this is shown through their stances on the debates and issues of historiography.

Return to