Suez Crisis


Length: 1018 words (2.9 double-spaced pages)
Rating: Excellent
Open Document
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Text Preview

More ↓

Continue reading...

Open Document

Suez Crisis


The Suez Crisis marks major shift in the power relations of western Europe, signalling the rising importance of cold war politics in international crises, The Crisis has a big impact on Canada and our peace keeping ability's.Lester Pearson's idea to stop the crisis hepls show that we are a peacefull nation.

Firstly, The Suez Crisis began on 26 July 1956, when United States' decision to withdraw its offer of a grant to aid the construction of Egypt's Aswan High Dam, Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal.(1) The governments of Britain and France secretly began planning for an invasion of Egypt. Israel soon was doing its own invasion planning, completing its final plan on 5 October. After several international mediation efforts had failed, Britain and France agreed in mid-October 1956 to undertake a joint intervention in Egypt. Aware of the upcoming Israeli plan to invade the Sinai, French officials suggested that a France-British force could enter Egypt and separate the combatants, while actually seizing control of the entire Suez waterway.(2) On 26 October, the United States learned of Israel's military mobilization, and President Dwight Eisenhower sent the first of two personal messages to Israeli Prime Minister Ben Gurion asking that Israel do nothing to endanger the peace. In the Mediterranean on the 28th, the U.S. Sixth Fleet was placed on alert.(3) Undeterred by U.S. diplomatic maneuvering, Israeli forces began attacks in Egypt on 29 October.The canal had many useful reason like trading, and to to have Nassar take control of stopped any other country from trading with country's like Isreal and this also stopped isreal from exporting their goods. No one predicted Nasser's nationalization of the Suez Canal on July 26,1956.(4) Four interconnected events prepared the way for Nasser's greatest moment: the Evacuation Treaty of 1954, the Baghdad Pact, the Czech arms deal, and the Aswan Dam negotiations. Nasser began a diplomatic campaign to restore Egyptian dignity and get the British out of Egypt. The British planned to create a Middle Eastern collective security organization similar to that of NATO and SEATO to protect their interests in the region. The US supported the idea but would not consider joining any such agreement. The President traveled to Egypt in 1953, because be believed Britain should consider Egypt for the base of the organization.(5) He quickly realized that neither Nasser nor his people would ever consent to such a deal.

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Suez Crisis." 123HelpMe.com. 22 Aug 2017
    <http://www.123HelpMe.com/view.asp?id=23489>.
Title Length Color Rating  
The Suez Crisis Essay - ... It did not want the Soviet Union to get involved in the Middles East so the United States forced the British to withdraw from the war leading to their defeat. They did not support the British force using “any threat of force to secure Egyptian agreement”. (Epstein) The British were not likely to win the war because “were in the domain of loss; they took serious risks and lost.” (McDermott164) The risks taken by the British were fruitless because after the war they became even weaker. Their loss in the war weakened them and strengthened the United States and the Soviet Union....   [tags: egypt, british] 1298 words
(3.7 pages)
Research Papers [preview]
The 1956 Suez Crisis in Terms of U.S Involvement Essay - In 1956, the United States, led by President Dwight Eisenhower, became self-enveloped in the Suez Canal Crisis involving Israel, Egypt, France, and Great Britain. The United States involvement in the Suez Canal Crisis not only resulted in an Egyptian and Soviet victory, but it also revealed that the United States was capable of gambling in order to gain alliance with Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser as a gateway into the Middle East. America, left utterly dismayed by its allies who planned an endeavor that neglected the country, became involved in the Suez Crisis to confirm its position as the super power in the Middle East....   [tags: suez canal, ferdinand lesseps, the risk]
:: 6 Works Cited
1290 words
(3.7 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Essay The Suez Crisis and Sir Antony Eden - ... The strategic importance of the canal heightened immediately after opening the canal to operations in 1869, because it was provided the shortest link between the Mediterranean and Indian Ocean. Particularly, the canal was of economic and political importance to the European colonial powers for it allowed them easy access to their colonies. By 1875, the British interests in India and the Far East had increased, further positioning the Suez Canal as the jugular vein of the British Empire operations....   [tags: decisions, nationalization, invade, policy] 1918 words
(5.5 pages)
Research Papers [preview]
The Suez War or Crisis of 1956 Essay - ... The British were angry at Nasser’s actions because their access to the canal would be limited so they decided to collude with France and Israel to punish him. They also feared that Nasser’s influence would eventually spread to the rest of the Middle East and this could compromise their access to oil. Therefore, they believed that his actions against them gave “the British and French forces” “a pretext to invade.” (The Economist) The plan was that Israel would attack Egypt and take over the canal while they would enter the conflict to bring to peace to the region....   [tags: british, egypt, geopolitical conflict] 1032 words
(2.9 pages)
Research Papers [preview]
The Suez Canal Crisis of 1956 Essay - ... Nasser himself was fearful of communist takeover and during his presidency the Egyptian Communist Party was banned. Clearly, the growing Communist Party of Syria did not deem this unification desirable, but support for the unity was quite popular resulting from Nasser’s leadership and diplomatic victory in the Suez Canal Crisis. Therefore, they could not strongly oppose the creation of the United Arab Republic in 1958. This union was short lived as Nasser refused to share significant power with Syria....   [tags: conflicts in the Middle East] 632 words
(1.8 pages)
Research Papers [preview]
Essay about Canadian Involvement in the Suez Crisis - Canadian Involvement in the Suez Crisis Eleven years after the second world war, a crisis occurred which had the potential to escalate into a third world war. Hostilities ran high and the background causes that prompted this crisis contained the same fundamentals as were seen in the first and second world wars. Those being militarism, alliances, imperialism and nationalism; wrought by those countries that had an interest in the Suez Canal and the Arab states. In the world of superpowers in conflict, Canada made a name for itself through an innovative peacekeeping scheme, instead of aggression (Encyclopedia Britannica Online, 1999-2000)....   [tags: Canadian Canada History] 970 words
(2.8 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
The Suez Crisis Of 1956 Essay - The Suez Crisis of 1956 Introduction      Among the most important foundations in the continuing Arab-Israeli conflict was the seeds that were sown in the aftermath of the 1956 Sinai Campaign, or the Suez Crisis. Whatever the operation is referred to as, its consequences involving both relations internal to the Middle East and with the world are impossible to ignore. Looked at simply as an objective event in history, one could note several key outcomes of the war. It marked the beginning of the end of British and French colonial leadership in the region, and the start of an increasingly high American and Soviet involvement....   [tags: Arab-Israeli Conflict History Arabs Israel Essays]
:: 8 Works Cited
3078 words
(8.8 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
The Suez Crisis: The Sun Sets on the Days of Empire Essay examples - ... Britain nevertheless willingly discussed the possibility of independence with Egypt, which was at the time an ostensibly-independent state but governed by British-appointed leaders. By 1952, however, Egypt’s leader King Farouk had been deposed in a military coup. Britain had been forced to send warships to Suez in order to protect British interests and establish a military presence, but had agreed with Egypt’s new president, General Nasser, that all forces would be withdrawn by June 1956. Meanwhile, Britain and America (citing Nasser’s connections with the Soviet Union) had refused to finance the Aswan High Dam, a costly project that was to be built across the river Nile in order to prot...   [tags: British empire, World War II] 1024 words
(2.9 pages)
Research Papers [preview]
Essay on Suez Crisis - Suez Crisis Anthony Eden was Prime Minister at the time of the Suez Crisis in 1956. His political career began in 1923 and by 1926 he had become a parliamentary private secretary at the Foreign Office. He was very involved with the League of Nations, believing in their principles and at the age of 38, became Foreign Secretary. At this time international affairs were seen as being aggressive and Anthony Eden was forced to resign from Neville Chamberlain's Government over his policy of appeasement....   [tags: Papers] 1638 words
(4.7 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Suez Crisis Essay - Suez Crisis The Suez Crisis marks major shift in the power relations of western Europe, signalling the rising importance of cold war politics in international crises, The Crisis has a big impact on Canada and our peace keeping ability's.Lester Pearson's idea to stop the crisis hepls show that we are a peacefull nation. Firstly, The Suez Crisis began on 26 July 1956, when United States' decision to withdraw its offer of a grant to aid the construction of Egypt's Aswan High Dam, Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal.(1) The governments of Britain and France secretly began planning for an invasion of Egypt....   [tags: Middle East History] 1018 words
(2.9 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]

Related Searches




Nasser wanted nothing to do with Britain.

Secondly, On October 29,1956, Israel attacked Egypt.(6) The following day Britain and France told both sides to immediately stop the fighting. The actual words of the letters said that French and British troops would be landing whether or not the fighting stopped. Everyone from Cairo to Washington saw through this poorly concealed ploy and the collusion that had occurred. Dulles and Eisenhower met immediately and decided to take the initiative.(7) They first brought action to the Security Council and when that failed, they took their case to the General Assembly of the UN. The timing of the invasion could not have been worse for the US because they were in the middle of an election and the states really couldn't help out either side until the president was picked. The upcoming presidential election meant that the president had to do somethiing fast inorder to stop the fighting . the president had to comment on the situation.(8) Nasser responded with shock, repulsion, and anger. Nasser closed down the Canal, cutting the invasion force off from the oil needed to continue the operation for any extended period. The Egyptian people decisively rallied around their leader millions joined on to resist the invasion. Iraq refused to sit with the British and severed ties with the French.(9) Nasser with encouragement and cut the pipeline running from the Gulf to the Mediterranean. Juring this time Nasser had been secrectly talking with russia and was asking for help if they needed it.Britian and France knew about russias involement but Russia had been quiet during the Crisis. Russia sent letters to London and Paris threatening "rocket attacks" if the invasion did not end. US and UN pressure made the cease-fire agreement .(10) The US position had been made clear. By doing nothing really yet appearing to seriously threaten the West, Russia stepped into the now gaping power vacuum that was the Middle East. Both during and after the Crisis, Nasser built up the Soviet role. This opened the door for a counter-balance to the US in the region , which was exactly what both Nasser and the Soviets wanted.(11)

Thirdly, The Canadian government's response, surprised Great Britain, which they had hoped for Canadian backing at this point. St. Laurent then asked his Secretary of State for External Affairs, Lester B. Pearson, to solve the crisis. Behind the scenes, a great number of strings began to be pulled.(12) On November 4, Pearson, assisted by his UN colleagues, suggested sending an international force to supervise the cessation of fighting. This force, which would include Canada, would be under Canadian command. The General Assembly of the United Nations accepted this proposal, as did the Egyptains, who were coming under pressure from the international community, especially from the United States and the USSR.(13) Around mid-November, the emergency task troops arrived in the Suez Canal Zone. A few days later, the occupying troops began to move out, and negotiations started with a view to ending the crisis. Although Pearson was congratulated on his action by representatives from other countries, and in particular by the United Kingdom, a pro-British segment of the English-Canadian electorate was highly indignant.(14) They believed that Canada should have shown more support for Great Britain, arguing that Britain's actions had been taken to preserve its honour and position in the world economy. Pearson received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1957, for his action during the crisis.(15)

In conclusion, the Suez Crisis marked a a major turning point in the way that people thought about the Canadian government and the way we handle ourselfs when I comes to making peace.Lester pearson was part of this reason and he was recoginized for it .


Return to 123HelpMe.com