Essay PreviewMore ↓
Although Henry refused to serve on the Constitutional Convention, Madison needed Henry's persuasive ways. Henry had a way to make people agree with his ideas. Even though Henry didn't serve on the Constitutional Convention, he was still present to put in his word. As soon as the meetings opened, Henry began to argue against the Constitution. This argument went on for three weeks. Henry was aware that the new government had to be strong, but felt that the Constitution made the central government too powerful. He thought that the power should lay in the hands of the states. "What right had they [the group that wrote the Constitution] to say 'We the people,' instead We, the States?" he demanded.
Not only was Henry in fear of the central government gaining power, but was also worried about protecting the South. He felt that the fast growing North would have more impute into how the government was to be ran. Henry feared that the South would be out voted in Congress. Patrick Henry was quoted before by saying, "I am not a Virginian. I am American." Henry meant that all the states, North or South, should get equal say in what happens in the government. After all it is the same country and will effect both sides.
Also, Henry refused to support the Constitution because it was lacking a bill of rights. He called it, "the most fatal plan that could possibly be conceived to enslave a free people." In other words he thought that without a bill of rights, we (the people) would be enslaving ourselves. Henry thought that the Constitution didn't protect the basic freedom of the people. Henry believed that people wouldn't be safe from a powerful government without the bill of rights.
The Constitution took away the power from the states, ignored the South, and didn't protect the people it represented. To Patrick Henry, these were big mistakes and couldn't put his support behind them. When the power is taken away from the states, it makes the federal government very strong. He knew that there had to be a strong central government, but felt that the Constitution went too far. Henry wanted to protect the South. After all, at that time the South was more than half the country. If the country at that time was compared to a human body, the South was the heart of the country.
How to Cite this Page
"Patrick Henry: Fight against the Constitution." 123HelpMe.com. 21 Jan 2020
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- One thing that many people may believe is that everyone in America supported the constitution. Yet, this is not true, especially for Patrick Henry. Although Henry refused to serve on the Constitutional Convention, Madison needed Henry's persuasive ways. Henry had a way to make people agree with his ideas and was very charismatic. Even though Henry didn't serve on the Constitutional Convention, he was still present to put in his word. As soon as the meetings opened, Henry began to argue against the Constitution.... [tags: essays research papers fc]
493 words (1.4 pages)
- Feniben Patel “The Conflict over the Constitution” The United States is known as the land of freedom, which permits, everyone to have their own opinions, and allows everyone to be able to convey them to others, this is permitted by the Constitution. The founding fathers had many contrasting point of views, regarding the formation of the Constitution. Patrick Henry, and James Madison had very diverse point of view, with regards to the government of the recently independent colonies. The United States government is based on federalism.... [tags: United States Constitution]
1125 words (3.2 pages)
- Patrick Henry’s Anti-Federalist argument had a big purpose when it was wrote. It was Henry’s way of talking about his objections to the new Constitution. He listed varies objection to the constitution and stated reasoning behind his objections to make others see his point. Henry was a liberal activist. He wrote his document in first person. The audience for his stated was for the general public. The general public that this would have been in interest to was the government, anti-federalists, the state, and any adult in general.... [tags: United States Constitution, Federalism]
710 words (2 pages)
- In this essay I will be discussing the Confederation and the Constitution. The articles of Confederation were diminished in comparison to the Constitution we all know today. Under the Articles, the federal government was weak and limited in power. A major issue was that congress could not collect taxes; they could only merely request funds from the states. The national debt was growing and soldiers needed to be paid for their service. Congress had only one representative for each state. This meant that a populous state would not be represented fairly with respect to its population.... [tags: United States Constitution]
923 words (2.6 pages)
- Patrick Henry “I know of no way of judging the future but by its past.” Patrick Henry wrote famous and well recognized speeches. Henry was a very persuasive writer and he changed the world in many ways. Patrick Henry was a driving force during the American Revolution through his powerful and motivation political rhetoric. Henry was born on May 29, 1736 in Studley in Hanover County, Virginia (Red Hill). His father John Henry was a Scottish – born planter. His dad educated young Patrick at home, including teaching him to read Latin, but Patrick studied law on his own (History).... [tags: political, war, speech]
692 words (2 pages)
- Constitution of United States was written in 1787 at Philadelphia convention. It is stated in article VII that the constitution needs to be accepted formally by nine out of thirteen states before it could be legally used. A big debate started whether the constitution should be ratified or not, dividing people into two groups federalists (supported ratification) and anti-Federalists (did not support ratification). Both groups had their own claims and arguments, federalists wanted a large heterogenous republic whereas anti-Federalists fought for homogeneous one.... [tags: Separation of powers, United States Constitution]
927 words (2.6 pages)
- At the Federal Convention in 1787, James Madison was prepared to propose a new form of government that would better represent the citizens of the United States, and he was further prepared to decry the Articles of Confederation due to their very nature of being too weak for the nation (Tindall & Shi, 2007). Although a few of the major political figures were unable to attend because they were on missions overseas, namely Adams and Jefferson, other invited delegates simply refused to attend, namely Patrick Henry.... [tags: Debates, State Sovereignty]
533 words (1.5 pages)
- The Anti-Federalists were not in favor of ratifying the new Constitution. Some Anti-Federalists wanted to keep the Articles of Confederation, others wanted to add some things and change some things in the new Constitution before they agreed to ratify it. Some very important Anti-Federalist’s were Patrick Henry, George Mason, and Richard Henry Lee. Anti-Federalists tended to be poorer and in lower classes than the Federalists. These people feared a central government and were afraid that the government proposed by the new Constitution could easily turn into a tyranny.... [tags: United States Constitution, United States]
706 words (2 pages)
The Conflict Between Federalists And Anti Federalists On The Writing And Ratification Of The Constitution
- Discuss the conflict between Federalists and anti-Federalists in the writing and ratification of the Constitution. After the American Revolutionary War, the founding fathers had to build a government from scratch. It is not surprising that many of who were lawyers, relied on the English constitution as the foundation since it was familiar to them. Based on this, the founders drew up the Articles of Confederation in 1781 as the first national law. It was considered weak because it placed too much power in the hands of individual states without establishing an effective national government.... [tags: United States Constitution, United States]
1072 words (3.1 pages)
- United States Constitution vs. Articles of Confederation The move from the Articles of Confederation to the United States Constitution caused several people to be unhappy. For 6 years the Articles weakened the United States in more ways than one. In the summer of 1787 a new form of government was created, a radical move from the Articles of Confederation. The United States Constitution and the Articles have several ever present difference that some considered to be too radical. In terms of levying taxes, the Articles Congress could request states to pay taxes while with the Constitution; the Congress has the right to levy taxes on individuals.... [tags: Political Science]
919 words (2.6 pages)