Patrick Henry: Fight against the Constitution


Length: 515 words (1.5 double-spaced pages)
Rating: Excellent
Open Document
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Text Preview

More ↓

Continue reading...

Open Document

Patrick Henry: Fight against the Constitution


Although Henry refused to serve on the Constitutional Convention, Madison needed Henry's persuasive ways. Henry had a way to make people agree with his ideas. Even though Henry didn't serve on the Constitutional Convention, he was still present to put in his word. As soon as the meetings opened, Henry began to argue against the Constitution. This argument went on for three weeks. Henry was aware that the new government had to be strong, but felt that the Constitution made the central government too powerful. He thought that the power should lay in the hands of the states. "What right had they [the group that wrote the Constitution] to say 'We the people,' instead We, the States?" he demanded.

Not only was Henry in fear of the central government gaining power, but was also worried about protecting the South. He felt that the fast growing North would have more impute into how the government was to be ran. Henry feared that the South would be out voted in Congress. Patrick Henry was quoted before by saying, "I am not a Virginian. I am American." Henry meant that all the states, North or South, should get equal say in what happens in the government. After all it is the same country and will effect both sides.
Also, Henry refused to support the Constitution because it was lacking a bill of rights. He called it, "the most fatal plan that could possibly be conceived to enslave a free people." In other words he thought that without a bill of rights, we (the people) would be enslaving ourselves. Henry thought that the Constitution didn't protect the basic freedom of the people. Henry believed that people wouldn't be safe from a powerful government without the bill of rights.

The Constitution took away the power from the states, ignored the South, and didn't protect the people it represented. To Patrick Henry, these were big mistakes and couldn't put his support behind them. When the power is taken away from the states, it makes the federal government very strong. He knew that there had to be a strong central government, but felt that the Constitution went too far. Henry wanted to protect the South. After all, at that time the South was more than half the country. If the country at that time was compared to a human body, the South was the heart of the country.

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Patrick Henry: Fight against the Constitution." 123HelpMe.com. 24 Jun 2017
    <http://www.123HelpMe.com/view.asp?id=23246>.
Title Length Color Rating  
Essay about Patrick Henry: Opposed to the Constitution - One thing that many people may believe is that everyone in America supported the constitution. Yet, this is not true, especially for Patrick Henry. Although Henry refused to serve on the Constitutional Convention, Madison needed Henry's persuasive ways. Henry had a way to make people agree with his ideas and was very charismatic. Even though Henry didn't serve on the Constitutional Convention, he was still present to put in his word. As soon as the meetings opened, Henry began to argue against the Constitution....   [tags: essays research papers fc]
:: 1 Works Cited
493 words
(1.4 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Essay on A Driving Force in the American Revolution, Patrick Henry - ... Her dowry was a 600-acre farm called Pine Slash, a house and six slaves. Henry’s first attempt as a planter got ruined when fire destroyed his house in 1757 (Red Hill). Near his twenty-fourth birthday he decided he was going to become a lawyer. He was Self-taught and barley prepared, Henry convinced the panel of well-known Virginia attorneys Wythe and Randolph that he had the cleverness to warrant admission to the bar (Red Hill). With his energy and his talents, and some encouragement from his important family, Henry established a successful practice in the courts of Hanover and adjacent counties....   [tags: political, war, speech] 692 words
(2 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Essay on Ratifying the Constitution - At the Federal Convention in 1787, James Madison was prepared to propose a new form of government that would better represent the citizens of the United States, and he was further prepared to decry the Articles of Confederation due to their very nature of being too weak for the nation (Tindall & Shi, 2007). Although a few of the major political figures were unable to attend because they were on missions overseas, namely Adams and Jefferson, other invited delegates simply refused to attend, namely Patrick Henry....   [tags: Debates, State Sovereignty]
:: 3 Works Cited
533 words
(1.5 pages)
Good Essays [preview]
Us Constitution Vs The Articles Of Confederation Essay - United States Constitution vs. Articles of Confederation The move from the Articles of Confederation to the United States Constitution caused several people to be unhappy. For 6 years the Articles weakened the United States in more ways than one. In the summer of 1787 a new form of government was created, a radical move from the Articles of Confederation. The United States Constitution and the Articles have several ever present difference that some considered to be too radical. In terms of levying taxes, the Articles Congress could request states to pay taxes while with the Constitution; the Congress has the right to levy taxes on individuals....   [tags: Political Science] 919 words
(2.6 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Partnership and Negotiaton: Updates to the Constitution of the US Essay - ... However, the recently proposed compromise, which calls for a bicameral congress is something that we can all agree on. Congress would have two houses—the Senate and the House of Representatives. The former consists of 2 members per state, while representation in the latter is based on population. Both parts of Congress would need to come to an agreement to pass a law, but this distinction pacifies concerns from each side. Another issue includes the lack of Executive and Judicial branches. Currently, there is an inability to properly enforce laws, as well as a federal court to determine the meaning of laws, or to settle disputes between states....   [tags: Articles, Confederation] 1103 words
(3.2 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Essay about The Bill of Rights - ... They felt a strong central government was necessary for the newly forming United States of America. This was because the country needed strengthening in foreign policy, as well as control of homeland from things including uncooperative states. It seemed for the most part Federalists were elitists and felt the government should be run by experienced and talented people, and it should not be a mobocracy, or ruled by the masses. The Antifederalists opposed them for that, and felt that the Constitution was written by aristocrats, and also accused them of using the Constitution to help the rich....   [tags: constitution, madison, federalists] 1432 words
(4.1 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
The Articles of Confederation vs. The United States Constitution Essay - The ratification of the Constitution was vital to the continuance of our country because of its advantages over the Articles of Confederation whose limited successes were faulty and less complete than the constitution that we know today. One of the most important documents in our country had a predecessor that was, at the time, fairly effective in governing the new country. However, I believe that the constitution we have today far outweighs the Articles of Confederation and that it was the perfect decision for our country to ratify it when they did....   [tags: us history] 837 words
(2.4 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Essay about U.S. Constitution Ratification Debates - U.S. Constitution Ratification Debates On September 28, 1787, after three days of bitter debate, the Confederation Congress sent the Constitution to the states with neither an endorsement nor a condemnation. This action, a compromise engineered by Federalist members, disposed of the argument that the convention had exceeded its mandate; in the tacit opinion of Congress, the Constitution was validly before the people. The state legislatures' decisions to hold ratifying conventions confirmed the Constitution's legitimacy....   [tags: Papers] 804 words
(2.3 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Patrick Henry's Famous Speech - Patrick Henry's Famous Speech 'Give me liberty or give me death.' These famous words were uttered by Patrick Henry on March 23, 1775, as a conclusion to his speech delivered to the Virginia House of Burgesses. Within his speech, he uses the three rhetorical appeals (ethos, logos, and pathos) to convey a feeling of urgency toward the changes occurring in policy within the Americas implemented by the British government. He cleverly uses these appeals to disrupt the paradigm that Great Britain is going to let the American people have any liberty....   [tags: History Patrick Henry Essays] 882 words
(2.5 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Arguments Of Fedrealists V. Anti-Federalists Essay examples - When the members of the Constitutional Convention, after several months of vigorous debating, finally finished their work, many of the members still objected to this document. The Federalists were the group of people who desired to get the finished new constitution ratified and the Anti-Federalists were the group of people who disliked the new constitution and believed it shouldn't be ratified because it was missing several key parts. The Anti-Federalists formulated arguments based on the weaknesses they found in the new constitution and used them against the Federalists in order to gain support, while the Federalists convinced citizens of the righteousness of the new constitution in order t...   [tags: United States History Constitution] 1104 words
(3.2 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]

Related Searches




How can a person live and survive without their heart. The bill of rights gave some of the power back to the people. Not only that, but gave them their liberty and freedom that they had fought so hard for early in the Revolution. In conclusion I believe that the fight against the constitution was a homerun. Even though the constitution was passed, Henry got his bill of rights. This affected the country big time because thanks to Henry, we the people got our freedom returned. If Henry didn't stick up for what he believed and stayed with it, who knows where the U. S. would be now.


Return to 123HelpMe.com