Capital Punishment Essay - The Death Penalty


Length: 1769 words (5.1 double-spaced pages)
Rating: Excellent
Open Document
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Text Preview

More ↓

Continue reading...

Open Document



The Death Penalty

 

        The death penalty is a very controversial issue.  Many people have

different opinions about how a criminal should be disciplined. Over 80% of

Americans favor the death penalty.

Presently, thirty-eight states have the death penalty, but is the concept of "a

life for a life" the best way to castigate a criminal?  Of the thirteen states

that do not have the death penalty, is crime more likely to occur there than in

states that have the death penalty?  (The Economist, April 1, 1995, p. 19)  Have

there been criminals wrongfully convicted and sentenced to death row?  Does the

death penalty really scare criminals off and make them think twice about

committing a crime?  Is the death penalty fair to everyone, even the minorities

and the poor?  How does mental illness and retardation come into play?     

 

        When a person is sentenced to death by lethal injection in New Jersey,

the provisions of N.J.S. 2C:  11-3 say that the "punishment shall be imposed by

continuous, intravenous administration until the person is dead of a lethal

quantity of an ultrashot acting barbiturate in combination with a chemical

paralytic agent in a quantity sufficient to cause death."  Prior to the lethal

injection, the person shall be sedated by a licensed physician, registered nurse,

or other qualified personnel, by either oral tablet or capsule or an

intramuscular injection of a narcotic or barbiturate such as morphine, cocaine,

or demerol.  In the provisions of the N.J.S.  2C:  49-3, it says that the

Commissioner of the Department of Corrections determines the substances and

procedure to be used in execution.  The Commissioner shall also designate

persons who are qualified to administer injections and who are familiar with

medical procedures, other than licensed physicians.  Also, persons conducting

the execution must be unknown to the person being executed.  Under the N.J.S.

2C:  49-7, only certain people are allowed to be present at the execution.  They

include:  the Commissioner, execution technicians, two licensed physicians, six

adult citizens, no more than two clergymen not related to the person, two

representatives from major news wire services, two television representatives,

two newspaper representatives, and two radio representatives.  No one related

either by blood or by marriage to the person being executed or to the victim is

permitted to be present during the execution.  (New Jersey Statutes Annotated:

Title 2C Code of Criminal Justice:  2C:  37 to 2C:  End)

 

        There are two very important Supreme Court cases dealing with capital

punishment.  In 1972, in the case of Furman vs. Georgia, the Supreme Court ruled

that under then existing laws, "the imposition and carrying out of the death

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Capital Punishment Essay - The Death Penalty." 123HelpMe.com. 01 May 2017
    <http://www.123HelpMe.com/view.asp?id=17502>.
Title Length Color Rating  
Put Capital Punishment to Death Essay - In a cold room of an unmarked building, a man awaits his death. The man lies on a metal table, strapped down like a wild animal. The straps cut into his wrists and legs, but no one cares. He is not scared—not anymore. He has no time for fear now. He vows to think only of the things that matter most—his daughters, his wife, his mother, the sunsets he will never see again, the ice cream he will never again enjoy. He knows he does not deserve to die. Yet nobody in the room cares; not the doctor who prepares the IV, the state official who stays busy scribbling away on meaningless paperwork, or the guards who avoid eye contact in the corner....   [tags: Capital Punishment, Death Penalty]
:: 7 Works Cited
2133 words
(6.1 pages)
Term Papers [preview]
Essay on Is the Death Penalty Cruel and Unusual Punishment? - Capital punishment remains a cause for debate with people continuing to disagree on what cruel and unusual punishment consists of. Cruel and unusual punishment being defined as torture or a deliberately degrading punishment, in no way does the death penalty fall into this category. Having the death penalty in our society deters potential violent offenders from committing crimes, saves the government money, and guarantees that offenders will not commit these crimes again. The United States should use the death penalty because it is economical and continues to be a deterrent for potential offenders....   [tags: capital punishment, death penalty] 1249 words
(3.6 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Capital Punishment Must Be Put To Death Essay - Capital punishment, better known as the death penalty, has been around for centuries. Like all elements of modern society, the death penalty has evolved over the course of many years. Initially, the death penalty was administered by a royal court or monarchy through brutal stoning. Since then, the guillotine, noose, electric chair, and [currently] lethal injection have all been tools created to administer the death penalty here in the United States. Before the act of actually ending the criminal’s life is performed he or she waits on death row during the course of any court proceedings....   [tags: Capital Punishment, Death Penalty]
:: 5 Works Cited
1713 words
(4.9 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
The Death Penalty Essay - The death penalty continues to be an issue of controversy and is an issue that will be debated in the United States for many years to come. According to Hugo A. Bedau, the writer of “The Death Penalty in America”, capital punishment is the lawful infliction of the death penalty. The death penalty has been used since ancient times for a variety of offenses. The Bible says that death should be done to anyone who commits murder, larceny, rapes, and burglary. It appears that public debate on the death penalty has changed over the years and is still changing, but there are still some out there who are for the death penalty and will continue to believe that it’s a good punishment....   [tags: capital punishment, death penalty]
:: 3 Works Cited
853 words
(2.4 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
The Death Penalty Essay - As of January 1, 2010, 3,261 people live on death row (“Death”). Fewer than 3,261 people live in my small town of Belle Plaine, so to me this number is outrageous. Inmates that wait on the death penalty jail create a problem for everyone in the country. If we would put these inmates through the death penalty quickly, we could take the problem away from the country. Why do we keep murderers and criminals on death row around. People argue the controversial topic of the death penalty very thoroughly, and address all sides....   [tags: capital punishment, death penalty]
:: 8 Works Cited
908 words
(2.6 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Essay about Capital Punishment - A famous expression, “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth” has become the basis for this political debate over the past several decades --- capital punishment. In society today, many people are murdered every day by the hands of another human being. Those who are for capital punishment promote that it is a deterrent for crime, provides closure, and is a moral punishment for those who choose to take a human life. Those not in favor of it argue that it is an ineffective crime deterrent, sends the wrong message, and is more expensive than sentencing a murderer to life in prison....   [tags: Capital Punishment, Death Penalty]
:: 2 Works Cited
1142 words
(3.3 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Essay Capital Punishment - Pros of Capital Punishment Capital punishment according to Phil .B, (2006), refers to a death penalty by the government of a country to a person who is found guilty of serious crimes like homicide, rape among others. Capital punishment has been a way of punishing people for many years. It has been prevalent in the United States, Asia and Middle Eastern countries. During the past two centuries many reforms on capital punishment have been made and it has been abolished in some states and countries....   [tags: Capital Punishment, Death Penalty]
:: 4 Works Cited
1341 words
(3.8 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Capital Punishment Essay - a) Through the Utilitarian perspective, Bedau is a firm believer in the removal of capital punishment; Bedau thinks that no reason is good enough justify the more severe punishment like death penalty on the moral ground, and no evidence of deterrence and prevention is sufficient enough to support the retribution of justice to keep capital punishment. Bedau have raised several arguments direct to the issue of death penalty: The morality of self-defense and death penalty; the efficiency prevention and the deterrence through capital punishment; then finally the inequity treatment towards the racially disadvantaged and poor....   [tags: Capital Punishment, Death Penalty] 2003 words
(5.7 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Capital Punishment Essay - There are not many issues that come to mind that have had the same effect on societal divides as has the issue regarding the death penalty. Debates swirling around the grounds of whether to abolish it or not has long since divided society on different beliefs in America, resulting in a concept that stirred up countless numbers of arguments and valid points. People’s outlooks on the issue have varied on situations involving the death penalty. The very mention of it sparks a certain passion within the justness and fairness of the American judicial system....   [tags: Capital Punishment, Death Penalty]
:: 3 Works Cited
657 words
(1.9 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Capital Punishment Essay - Not many issues come to mind that have affected society in such a way that has resulted in protests, out roars and heated debates as ha the issue regarding the death penalty. Debates have hovered around as long as capital punishments beginning; differing on viewpoints whether to abolish it or not and whether or not it is s just form of punishment. The different ends of the spectrum arguing their beliefs has resulted in a divided society with innumerable tallies under the pros and cons to the issues at hand....   [tags: Capital Punishment, Death Penalty]
:: 3 Works Cited
652 words
(1.9 pages)
Better Essays [preview]

Related Searches





penalty...constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth

and Fourteenth Amendments."  Four years later, in the case of Gregg vs. Georgia,

the Supreme Court shifted in the opposite direction, and ruled that "the

punishment of death does not invariably violate the Constitution."  The Court

ruled that these new statutes contained "objective standards to guide,

regularize, and make rationally reviewable the process of imposing the sentence

of death."  (Bedau, Hugo Adam, American Civil Liberties Union, prodigy)

 

       There are many different reasons, pro and con, for the death penalty.

The following are the most frequently cited arguments for the death penalty.

Some believe that those who kill deserve to die.  When someone takes another

person's life, they forfeit or sacrifice their own right to live.  Murder is one

of the worst crimes a person can commit and it deserves the worst penalty.  The

death penalty is the greatest deterrent to murder.  If people know that they

will be punished by death, they will be less likely to commit crimes and kill.

Statistics show that since 1976, fewer than two hundred of the 2500-plus people

on death row have been executed.  Some say that more than 20,000 murders that

take place each year could have been prevented if criminals believed they would

be executed for their crimes.  Murders pose a threat to everyone and should be

isolated from society.  The death penalty guarantees that the killer would not

be able to kill again.  Life imprisonment does not guarantee that.  Criminals

can be released on parole or escape from prison, giving them opportunities to

murder again.  (Scholastic Update, Sept. 4, 1992, p. 13-16)

 

        The arguments against the death penalty are just as strong.  Two wrongs

do not make a right.  How many times have children heard that from their

parents?  Adults should follow their own advice.  Murder is murder and it is

wrong no matter what, even if it is ruled constitutional.   In the civilized

society that we live in, is the notion of "an eye for an eye" acceptable?

Should the punishment for a rape, be another rape?  Or for arson, should we burn

down the arsonist's house?  One of the government's jobs is to protect its

citizens, but there are others ways to do it without killing.  There are no

creditable studies that show that capital punishment acts effectively as a

deterrent to crime, murder, and other capital offenses.  Most crimes are

committed on the spur of the moment or in the heat of passion, and the person is

usually either under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol.  Therefore, most do

not think about the consequences of their wrongful actions.  States that have

death penalty laws do not have lower crime rates or murder rates than states

without such laws.  And states that have abolished capital punishment show no

significant changes in either crime or murder rates.  Also, the death penalty

rarely discourages murderers who plan to kill because they do not believe that

they will be caught.  Humans are errable.  Mistakes are made in trying capital

cases very often and can and have taken innocent lives.  A recent study showed

that 350 people who were convicted of crimes for which they could have been put

to death for, were later found to be inculpable.  Tragically, twenty-three were

executed wrongly.  Some find that the death penalty discriminates against the

minorities and the poor and is not administrated fairly.  Approximately 20,000

murders are committed each year, but only one out of a hundred convicted

murderers are sentenced to death.  Almost half of those sentenced to die are

black and 84% of those were convicted of killing a white.  Furthermore, more

than 90% of the inmates currently on death row were too poor to hire a lawyer to

represent them at their trial.  People are being executed not because of the

heinousness of their crimes, but because of the incompetence of their lawyers.

(Scholastic Update, p. 13-16 and prodigy)

 

        The American Civil Liberties Union believes that capital punishment is

an intolerable denial of civil liberties.  They feel that the death penalty

essentially violates the constitutional ban against cruel and unusual punishment

and the guarantee of due process of law and the equal protection of the laws.

The state should not take unto itself the right to kill human beings, especially

when it kills with "premeditation and ceremony, under color of law, in our names,

and when it does so in an arbitrary and discriminatory fashion."  (Bedau, Hugo

Adam, American Civil Liberties Union, prodigy)

 

        The cost of an execution is extravagantly costly.  Every study carried

out and completed have shown that it is far more expensive to put someone to

death than to jail him for life.  Two Duke University professors calculated that

between the extra costs of litigation, and of housing and guarding the inmates

as they wait on death row, the extra cost to taxpayers was $2.2 million per

execution.  The Sacramento Bee estimates that California spends $90 million each

year on the death penalty; in eighteen years the state has put precisely two

people to death.  Conservatives say that the solution to this high cost is to

curtail or cut back the number of death row inmates to appeals.  This way the

time that he is in jail will be shorten and execution will take place sooner.

The  Supreme Court's rulings on the matter rest on the notion that, as a

punishment, death is different.  It cannot be infringed arbitrarily, it must be

imposed consistently. (The Economist, 1995, p. 19-20)

 

        Have criminals been wrongfully convicted and sentenced to death row?

The answer is yes.  Astonishingly enough, a recent report revealed that between

1900-1985, 350 people have been wrongfully convicted of capital offenses.  In

the last two decades, forty-eight wrongfully convicted people have been released

from death row because of innocence.  Unfortunately, twenty-three of the three

hundred and fifty people wrongfully convicted, were already executed before the

evidence came about.  Justice Thurgood Marshall, a long time opponent of the

death penalty feared that "if an individual is imprisoned for an offense he did

not commit, the error can to some extent be rectified, but if he is executed,

the wrong that has been done can never be corrected."  (Jet, March 13, 1995, p.

12-15)

 

        William Hance, a former marine, was sentenced to death for the murder of

two prostitutes and awaiting the "chair of death".  The day before, the Georgia

board of pardons and paroles rejected Hance's appeal for clemency.  The day of

the execution both the state and federal court refused to halt the execution.

Then the Supreme Court denied Hance's appeal.  The legal skirmishing had gained

him ninety extra minutes of life.  This execution was different though.  One of

the twelve jurors to sentence Hance to death swore that she never agreed to the

supposedly unanimous vote.  Gayle Daniels, the only black juror, swore on an

affidavit the she did not vote for the execution because she "did not believe

[Hance] knew what he was doing at the time of his crimes.  There was also

shocking evidence that race prejudice played a central role in the jury's

deliberations.  Finally, Hance may have been mentally retarded.  The prosecutor

who helped investigate the first murder case, Douglas Pullen, argued that "at

the very least, this man has a borderline I.Q.  That is not retarded."  But

Hance's trial in a military court for the second murder ended in the reversal of

a life sentenced after jurors determined that he lacked the capacity for

premeditation.  (Smolowe, Jill, Time, April 11, 1994, p. 61)

 

        Fortunately, not all cases end unhappily.  In several cases the accused

were found innocent just in time.  Andrew Golden was very lucky.  His case was

reversed twenty-six months after he was put on death row.  He was sentenced to

death for the possible murder of his wife, Ardelle.  She drowned in a lake.

 


Return to 123HelpMe.com