Argumentative Essay: Gun Control Does Not Reduce Crime

  • Length: 1646 words (4.7 double-spaced pages)
  • Rating: Excellent
Open Document

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Text Preview

More ↓

Continue reading...

Open Document

Americans are faced with an ever-growing problem of violence. Our streets

have become a battleground where the elderly are beaten for their social

security checks, where terrified women are viciously attacked and raped,

where teen-age gangsters shoot it out for a patch of turf to sell their

illegal drugs, and where innocent children are caught daily in the

crossfire of drive-by shootings. We cannot ignore the damage that these

criminals are doing to our society, and we must take actions to stop these

horrors. However, the effort by some misguided individuals to eliminate the

legal ownership of firearms does not address the real problem at hand, and

simply disarms the innocent law-abiding citizens who are most in need of a

form of self-defense.


To fully understand the reasons behind the gun control efforts, we must

look at the history of our country, and the role firearms have played in it.

The second amendment to the Constitution of the United States makes firearm

ownership legal in this country. There were good reasons for this freedom,

reasons which persist today. Firearms in the new world were used initially

for hunting, and occasionally for self-defense. However, when the colonists

felt that the burden of British oppression was too much for them to bear,

they picked up their personal firearms and went to war. Standing against

the British armies, these rebels found themselves opposed by the greatest

military force in the world at that time. The 18th century witnessed the

height of the British Empire, but the rough band of colonial freedom

fighters discovered the power of the Minuteman, the average American gun

owner. These Minutemen, so named because they would pick up their personal

guns and jump to the defense of their country on a minute's notice, served

a major part in winning the American Revolution. The founding fathers of

this country understood that an armed populace was instrumental in fighting

off oppression, and they made the right to keep and bear arms a

constitutionally guaranteed right.


Over the years, some of the reasons for owning firearms have changed. As

our country grew into a strong nation, we expanded westward, exploring the

wilderness, and building new towns on the frontier. Typically, these new

towns were far away from the centers of civilization, and the only law they

had was dispensed by townsfolk through the barrel of a gun. Crime existed,

but could be minimized when the townspeople fought back against the

criminals. Eventually, these organized townspeople developed police forces

as their towns grew in size. Fewer people carried their firearms on the

street, but the firearms were always there, ready to be used in self-

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Argumentative Essay: Gun Control Does Not Reduce Crime." 20 May 2018
Title Length Color Rating  
Gun Control Does Not Reduce Crime Essay - In the United States there are many issues under hot debate. Some people are so set in their belief on a subject that they won’t even consider an opposing argument. Gun control is third on the list of subjects in which people are not willing to listen to the opposition’s argument. One side of the gun control argument is that we need more gun control. The opposing side says we don’t need stronger laws, or we need fewer laws. My stand on the argument is that we do not need stronger gun control laws....   [tags: Argumentative Essays, Persuasive Essays]
:: 14 Works Cited
2317 words
(6.6 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Gun Control Does Not Reduce Crime Essay - Gun laws are a subject many people feel strongly about, and as with any subject people feel strongly about there are no shortage of data and statistics that seem to support either side. I decided to look into any correlation I could find between gun laws and deaths in the US. Just like with political parties and deficit spending I didn't really have any expectations, but would probably guess that there wasn't much correlation. Before I go any further I'll pretend like it is necessary to give a brief background on my stance on guns in general....   [tags: Argumentative Essays, Persuasive Essays] 1206 words
(3.4 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Essay The Effects and Consequences of Gun Control - “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The right of all Americans to bear arms is a right the Founding Fathers held to equal importance as the Constitution itself. Gun control laws directly violate this right and therefore should not even be under consideration. Even if that issue is overlooked, gun control advocates state that in order to reduce firearm related violence, gun control laws must be implemented to remove the violence caused by firearms....   [tags: argumentative, persuasive, gun control]
:: 6 Works Cited
2071 words
(5.9 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Essay on Gun Control Laws Will Increase Crime - America has always prided itself on being the land of the free. Our national Constitution and Bill of Rights have ensured that the people of America maintain their basic rights. Nevertheless, many of the rights guaranteed in these historic documents are often the subject of heated debate. The right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures under the Fourth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee against self-incrimination, the First Amendment’s protection of speech and petitioning activity, all of these issues have been subject to contentious arguments in courts of law and the courts of public opinion....   [tags: Gun Control Essays]
:: 6 Works Cited
2980 words
(8.5 pages)
Term Papers [preview]
Gun Control Fails To Prevent Criminals From Getting Guns Essays - It’s a quiet, Sunday afternoon. The rain is coming down outside, and the sound of it makes for a relaxing ambiance. You open a few windows and the front door to better enjoy the calming effect of the rainfall. Going into the kitchen, you decide to make a cup of coffee so you can sit down and read the Sunday paper. Suddenly, a man bursts into your home carrying a small pistol and comes running towards you. You manage to shut the kitchen door and go through the pantry into your hallway. Running up the stairs, you turn around and see the man coming up behind you....   [tags: argumentative, persuasive, gun control]
:: 3 Works Cited
1041 words
(3 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Essay on Has Your Voice About Gun Safety Been Stolen? - The questions that surround the issues of gun safety have resurfaced again since the recent shootings in Arizona. (Luo) Are background checks enough to help prevent shooting violence. Do guns that have the capacity to fire several rounds without having to reload have any influence on the number of deaths that occur due to shootings. Should mental health be screened further as a preventative safety measure. It is suggested that perhaps we the American people will never know. According to scientists and former government officials that were part of the National Center for Injury Control and Prevention, which is a division of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, the answers to these q...   [tags: argumentative, persuasive, gun control]
:: 5 Works Cited
1569 words
(4.5 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
Argumentative Essay: The Appalling Lack of Gun Control in the United States - There is an appalling, despicable lack of gun control in the United States. In my opinion the manner in which the issue of gun control is approached in this country is bordering on criminal negligence in and of itself. The insanity surrounding this controversial issue is taking the Second Amendment to the Bill of Rights in the United States constitution way too far. I ask myself this question, could the Founding Fathers of this amazing country have possibly envisioned a world in which teenagers could casually walk into a classroom, pull out a loaded pistol and cold bloodily murder their teachers and fellow classmates....   [tags: Argumentative Persuasive Argument Essays] 1095 words
(3.1 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
People for Gun Control Essay - People for Gun Control The recent events that has happened, such as the school shootings and all the violence seen on television, has without a doubt made many of us consider gun control as a possible solution to the violence that has spread across the nation. On the other hand there are other ways to reduce the violence besides using gun control to do that, which are teaching proper gun handling and making mandatory licensing to obtain a gun. With gun control laws the government is putting the average citizen in harms way by taking there gun away from them....   [tags: Argumentative Persuasive Example Essays] 1233 words
(3.5 pages)
Good Essays [preview]
Gun Control Essay examples - Gun Control Gun control is an issue that many are faced with daily. Parents are concerned about the safety of their children more now than before. Some want gun control and some do not. I am against gun control because I believe if properly educated about a gun, anyone can use it to a certain extent. I know gun control laws would help cut back on the store robberies, bank robberies, gang shootings, etc. Gun laws that restrict the sale of handguns would help keep handguns out of criminals’ hands....   [tags: Argumentative Firearms Essays Papers Weapons]
:: 7 Works Cited
798 words
(2.3 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
More Gun Control Essay - More Gun Control One of the biggest issues in the United States that I would change would be gun control. The government is constantly proposing legislation for more and more gun control. Slowly they are chipping away at our constitutional right to keep and bear arms. You must ask yourself: For what reason does the government want to restrict law-abiding citizens from owning guns. Certainly government is not so naive to think criminals will adhere to gun control laws. There just may be an underlying motive for gun control....   [tags: Argumentative Persuasive Example Essays] 942 words
(2.7 pages)
Better Essays [preview]

Related Searches



It was after the Civil War that the first gun-control advocates came into

existence. These were southern leaders who were afraid that the newly freed

black slaves would assert their newfound political rights, and these

leaders wanted to make it easier to oppress the free blacks. This

oppression was accomplished by passing laws making it illegal in many

places for black people to own firearms. With that effort, they assured

themselves that the black population would be subject to their control, and

would not have the ability to fight back. At the same time, the people who

were most intent on denying black people their basic rights walked around

with their firearms, making it impossible to resist their efforts. An

unarmed man stands little chance against an armed one, and these armed men

saw their plans work completely. It was a full century before the civil

rights activists of the 1960s were able to restore the constitutional

freedoms that blacks in this country were granted in the 1860s.


Today's gun control activists are a slightly different breed. They claim

that gun violence in this country has gotten to a point where something

must be done to stop it. They would like to see criminals disarmed, and

they want the random violence to stop. I agree with their sentiments.

However, they are going about it in the wrong way. While claiming that they

want to take guns out of the hands of criminals, they work to pass

legislation that would take the guns out of the hands of law-abiding

citizens instead. For this reason the efforts at gun control do not address

the real problem of crime.


The simple definition of a criminal is someone who does not obey the law.

The simple definition of a law-abiding citizen is someone who does obey the

law. Therefore, if we pass laws restricting ownership of firearms, which

category of people does it affect? The simple answer is that gun control

laws affect law-abiding citizens only. By their very nature, the criminals

will continue to violate these new laws, they will continue to carry their

firearms, and they will find their efforts at crime much easier when they

know that their victims will be unarmed. The situation is similar to that

of the disarmed blacks a century ago. Innocent people are turned into

victims when new laws make it impossible for them to fight back. An unarmed

man stands little chance against an armed one.


An interesting recent development has been the backlash against the gun-

control advocates. In many states, including Florida and Texas, citizens

have stated that they want to preserve their right to carry firearms for

self-defense. Since the late 1980s, Florida has been issuing concealed

weapons permits to law-abiding citizens, and these citizens have been

carrying their firearms to defend themselves from rampant crime. The result

is that the incidence of violent crime has actually dropped in contrast to

the national average. Previously, Florida had been leading the nation in

this category, and the citizens of that state have welcomed the change. Gun

control advocates tried to claim that there would be bloodshed in the

streets when these citizens were given the right to carry. They tried to

claim that the cities of Florida would become like Dodge City with

shootouts on every street corner. These gun control advocates were wrong.

Over 200,000 concealed carry permits have been issued so far, with only 36

of these permits revoked for improper use of a firearm. This statistic is

easy to understand. It is the law-abiding citizens who are going through

the process of getting concealed carry permits so that they may legally

carry a firearm. The people who go through this legal process do not want

to break the law, and they do not intend to break the law. The people who

do intend to break the law will carry their guns whether or not the law

allows them to do so.


Criminals will always find ways to get guns. In this country we have

criminalized the use, possession, sale, and transportation of many kinds of

narcotics, but it's still easy for someone to take a ride and purchase the

drugs of their choice at street corner vendors. Firearms and ammunition

would be just as easy for these black-market entrepreneurs to deliver to

their customers. Today, criminals often carry illegal weapons, including

sawed-off shotguns, machine guns, and homemade zip-guns, clearly showing

their disregard for the current laws which make these items illegal. And

when they are caught, the courts regularly dismiss these lesser weapons

charges when prosecuting for the more serious charges that are being

committed with the weapons.


The gun control advocates have argued their case by demonizing the gun

itself, rather than addressing the people who commit violent crimes. This

is the main fallacy in their argument. They slyly attempt to claim that

possession of a gun turns average citizens into bloodthirsty lunatics. This

theory falls apart under close scrutiny. If legal possession of a firearm

caused this sort of attitude, then why are crime rates highest in areas

such as Washington, D.C. and New York City which have strict gun control

laws? And why are crime rates dropping in states such as Florida where

private ownership of firearms is encouraged? Simply stated, legal ownership

of a gun does not cause crime. The most recent efforts of the gun control

lobby has been to claim that certain types of guns and ammunition are

inherently evil. They assign emotional catch phrases such as "assault

weapons" and "cop killer bullets" to broad categories of firearms and

ammunition in the hopes that people will believe that some guns have an

evil nature. Most people who are unfamiliar with firearms do not fully

understand what these phrases mean, and they accept the terms being used

without question. What people do not often understand is that the term

"assault weapon" has been defined to include all semi- automatic rifles,

and "cop killer" has been defined to include any bullet that can penetrate

type two body armor. It comes as a surprise to most people that a large

number of simple hunting rifles can do both. Does ownership of one of these

weapons cause people to become mass murderers? It does not, and we must not

fall into the trap of blaming the sword for the hand that wields it.


So I've shown that the act of making it illegal to own firearms does little

to prevent criminals from getting guns. These laws only restrict people who

respect the law, the people who would only use firearms for legal

purposes. And when we give people the right to defend themselves, we

find that criminals start looking for other victims out of fear that they

will become the victims themselves. We must work to reduce crime in America,

but we should look at the problem realistically, and develop plans that

would be effective. It is obvious that gun control laws are neither

realistic, nor effective in reducing crime. Therefore, we must direct our

efforts toward controlling crime, not controlling legal ownership of


Return to